Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 329 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Unity08 Jettisons its Grassroots as Comments are Removed.

Unity08 is a corporation filing a confidential lawsuit against the FEC to take unlimited donations in its quest to elect its own presidential candidate to the White House. A large majority of its contributors in the last three months of 2006 were large finance capitalists. Unity08 Chief Operating Officer Anya T. Harris told me personally that she made the effort to personally contact every single one. Unity08’s leadership is studded with insider political consultants and lobbyists. Yet Unity08 somehow describes itself in public as a “grassroots” “People’s Movement” to “take our country back” from — guess who? — lobbyists, consultants and rich fatcats.

It’s been amazing to me over the past nine months or so that nobody in the major news media saw through the Unity08 charade. I don’t know why that was, exactly, but I have a few guesses. In some cases, reporters covering Unity08 had personal ties to the insider leaders of Unity08. I also imagine that reporters yearn for some kind of twist to the traditional two-party contest. They want a different story to cover, and Unity08 provides the faux sepia tone for a vision of America without disagreement, without debate, where everybody just holds hands and loves each other and stifles that nasty disagreement thingamabob that is just so distasteful to a segment of the American consuming public.

But now I think we’re seeing Unity08 finally start to sink under the strain of playing an insider game, pretending to be grassroots, and holding actual grassroots people at a very long arm’s length. Today is the day I think Unity08 actually jumped the shark.

A few days ago, someone started posting repeating comments to Unity08 asking the Unity08 leadership when they were going to start giving visitors an interface that let them make decisions and participate more fully in building consensus on policy issues.

Yesterday, those comments began disappearing under a “Sorry, You Don’t Have Access to View This” mystery deletion.

Today, as independent critical comments and questions kept being posted onto the Unity08 front page, Unity08 simply removed all public, grassroots comments from its frontpage.

Unity08 may pull some kind of surprise out of its hat. That, and Bush may apologize for running this country into the ground. Also, pigs may fly.

Really, though, I think it’s time to begin the Unity08 Death Watch. That hypocritical, insider, elite-funded exercise in fake-populist manipulation is on its way out — and I really don’t think it will be missed outside the DC dinner circuit from which its leaders and donors hail.

5 comments to Unity08 Jettisons its Grassroots as Comments are Removed.

  • Anonymous

    Some of their diehard true believers have come to that conclusion too. Today one of them says, “Newt Gingrich is starting a unitylike site soon, so I’ll be checking that out too.” That ought to really draw the ‘centrists’. Even though U08 posters have been complaining for some time about the lack of leadership and moderation on the forums, as well as the ability of a few people to dominate the discussion with flaming remarks and the lack of navigation aids to follow an in-depth conversation, for several weeks now some comments have been deleted, and deleted rapidly. So my guess is whatever is happening to the ability of the u08 grassroots to communicate and organize ideas on the forum is happening exactly the way u08 wants it. Did you also notice someone else has been troubled by the sporatic nature of communications with Ms. Harris? She’s a very interesting penpal, but not a reliable one. And whatever happened to their “clean money pledge”? That’s sure not on the front pages anymore, or on the back pages either.

  • Yeah, but it’s not linked to from anywhere, is it? It’s like they’re trying to hide it.

  • Diana

    I thought it was a “Safe Money Pledge” instead of “Clean Money Pledge”

    Which one is it?

  • Jim

    CLEAN MONEY PLEDGE: Their pledge for others to adopt, a pledge which they fail to meet themselves.

    SAFE MONEY PLEDGE: The pledge I wrote which I asked them to adopt, and which they have failed to agree to.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>