Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 311 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

FISA Amendments Act Is George Orwell 2008

Right now, George W. Bush is giving a speech in which he says that America is in danger of terrorist attack unless the House of Representatives passes a law to give him the power to spy against Americans at will and gives legal amnesty to telecommunications corporations who helped George W. Bush break the law and violate the Constitution.

Catch the twists in that argument?

Bush’s argument is that that in order to protect you from foreign terrorists, he needs a law that gives him the power to spy against Americans.

Bush’s argument is that in order to protect you from foreign terrorists, corporations need to be protected from Americans who are angry that the corporations violated their constitutional rights and broke the promises the corporations made in customer privacy agreements.

Bush’s argument is that in order to protect America from foreign terrorists, the President needs the power to coerce American corporations into helping him break the law.

If George W. Bush is really trying to protect us from foreign terrorists, how come his targets are American?

The law that George W. Bush is pushing for, the FISA Amendments Act, is not about protecting Americans from terrorists. Think about it: When was the last time that there was any terrorist attack within the United States? It’s been almost seven years.

George W. Bush is arguing that you need to give up your constitutional rights to protect you from something that happened seven years ago.

Don’t forget the facts: The FISA Amendments Act would give George W. Bush the right to send spies to search through your home and office without any search warrant, and without any evidence that you are connected to any crime at all – terrorist or not. How is that protecting you from terrorists? Are you hiding any terrorists in your home?

The FISA Amendments Act would give George W. Bush the right to have his spies listen to your telephone calls whenever they want to, without any search warrant, and without any evidence to suggest that you are even suspected of being connected to terrorists. How is that protecting you from terrorists? Are you talking about terrorist plots on your telephone?

The FISA Amendments Act would give George W. Bush the right to read your email and track your activities on the Internet, without any search warrant, and do so without any search warrant, and without any evidence that you are even suspected of jaywalking, much less terrorist conspiracy. How is that protecting you from terrorists? Are you plotting a terrorist attack by email and on EBay?

George W. Bush is playing a con artist’s game with you. First, he tries to get you afraid. He says that terrorists could attack you at any time. Second, he comes up with a solution for the irrational fear he has inspired in you: Give him whatever he wants. Give him your freedom. Give him the powers of Big Brother. Convert the United States of America into a nation of omnipresent spying against its own citizens, a nightmare straight out of a George Orwell novel.

Of course, George W. Bush doesn’t really express his argument in those terms. He doesn’t mention the details of the FISA Amendments Act when he gives his speeches about the law. Bush never admits what the law would allow him to do.

Like a good demagogue, George W. Bush keeps his argument simple, leaving all the disturbing premises that his argument depends upon unspoken. George W. Bush just says that terrorists are trying to kill you, and that he needs the FISA Amendments Act to stop them.

Bush promises that he will only use the spy powers of the FISA Amendments Act against bad people.

Think about that for minute: Do you really think that George W. Bush can be trusted to keep that promise?

4 comments to FISA Amendments Act Is George Orwell 2008

  • Tom

    Like (almost) everything else in his presidency (dictatorship) do you think he’ll end up getting his way because our spineless Congress (especially the vaunted democrats) keep caving in to his whining?

    Remember, when the government is broken, we can’t count on it to do the job it was designed to do (protect us from tyranny by upholding the Constitution and protect us from the continuing corporate takeover of our natural resources, their deregulation binge and its subsequent trashing of both the economy and the value of our currency.

    We’re in DEEP DOO-DOO, kids. Hold onto your assets.

  • Fruktata

    Most of all, we can’t count on the American people to pay attention. How many people do you even know who are aware that this is going on, beyond the vague, soundbite “protect us from terrorists” level?

  • Iroquois

    House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said Thursday he is “very hopeful” the House will take up controversial electronic surveillance legislation next week, signaling a possible break in the impasse over the issue.

    The White House and Republicans have been pushing the House to vote on a Senate passed update of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that includes retroactive immunity for telecom companies that assisted the government—a move House Democratic leaders have so far resisted.

    Many moderate “Blue Dog” Democrats have been pushing Hoyer and the Democratic leadership to act before the spring recess, even if it means voting on the Senate bill.

    On Wednesday, 20 moderate “Blue Dog” Democrats met with Hoyer to push for a vote on the electronic surveillance measure, according to Congressional Quarterly.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/28/politics/politico/thecrypt/main3888000.shtml

  • Iroquois

    Still looking for info about what is going on with this bill after the president’s remarks the other day. Looks like it was triggered by the House coming back from recess:
    http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=574&topicId=100007424&docId=l:752582268&start=4

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>