Browse By

Why We Need Habeas Corpus: Dozens to Hundreds of Non-Terrorists Shoved into Guantanamo

This is why America needs habeas corpus.

A McClatchy Newspapers investigation reveals that “dozens and perhaps hundreds of men” have been wrongfully detained at the Guantanamo Bay indefinite detention facility without charge and without the habeas corpus right to challenge the basis for their detention. A review of the cases by McClatchy journalists revealed “fabricated evidence, old personal scores or bounty payments” to be the basis of these detentions.

How botched were the detentions of supposed “terrorists”? Some of those detained actually turned out to have been working… for the Americans. And how shoddy was the collection of evidence regarding these supposed “terrorists”? People were sent to Guantanamo and kept there for years on the basis of the unsubstantiated claims of the people who handed them over for cash. That’s how some of these people ended up in Guantanamo as “terrorists.” Where they were beaten. And subjected to “enhanced interrogation techniques.” Federal law and international law call it torture.

Newspaper employees did a better job gathering evidence in these cases than all the Homeland Security apparatus of the Bush administration, which just didn’t bother itself with completing the thorough task.

That’s why simply trusting the government when it tells you it’s got “the terrorists” is a bad idea.
That’s why a review of the evidence, not by a partial military panel but by an impartial judge, is crucial.
That’s why an all-powerful executive is dangerous.
That’s why we need separation of powers in this country.
That’s why we need habeas corpus in this country.

Not to protect the actual terrorists.
But to protect the people our government calls “the terrorists.” Then detains for years. And tortures. When they are nothing of the sort.
Next time around, to protect you.

6 thoughts on “Why We Need Habeas Corpus: Dozens to Hundreds of Non-Terrorists Shoved into Guantanamo”

  1. Sam says:

    The line…“dozens and perhaps hundreds of men”…means they don’t know and they are guessing. Which also means they are clueless….

  2. Jim says:

    No, it doesn’t.

    It means they used a sample, have verified observations for many dozens, and extrapolated out from the sample to make a prediction about “perhaps hundreds.”

  3. Sam says:

    A prediction….no facts…just guesses….

  4. Jim says:

    No. Knowledge. Research. Concrete findings for a large group of dozens of Guantanamo detainees. Extrapolation to the entire population.

  5. hendrixbot says:

    Sam, predictions are things like, “If you vote for x the terrorists Will attack Y.”

    A guess based on no facts would sound more like, “There are N terrorist sleeper cells in the US, so your civil liberties must be suspended.”

    If they had actually caught and convicted a few sleepers, you could extrapolate to something like, “There are N terrorist sleeper cells in the US” but such is not the case.

    Anyway McClatchy’s figures are based on more hard numbers than similar claims from the administration which go unquestioned. If nothing else, we know the administration makes the circular argument “they’re in Guantanamo, so they must be terrorists” even though hundreds of detainees have been cycled through and released. So, unless you want to say the administration is releasing terrorists, there must be (or must have been) some non-terrorists in there.

  6. sam says:

    Many have been cycled thro..released and were found on the battlefield again…fortunatly they were killed there so we didn’t have to do it again…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!