Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 493 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Beware The Rush To Put America 700 Billion More In Debt

When it comes to political issues, I have a rule that’s worked well for me: Bring extra skepticism to any plan when its proponents declare that it has to be rushed to approval.

I’ve observed in local politics how people who want to get a project approved with little scrutiny invent artificial deadlines for their project’s passage. They declare that state funding for the project will not be available after that date, and so the project needs to be approved right away. Then, they’ll make the same argument the next year when they propose the very same project all over again.

The call to hurry up before all is lost is a ploy that’s often used to prevent people from spending the time to examine a proposal carefully and rationally. This ploy was used in the passage of the Patriot Act back in 2001. Congress passed the law without reading it, and crippled Americans’ constitutional freedoms in the process. It turned out that the Patriot Act was not truly a response to the attacks of September 11, 2001. The law’s provisions had been crafted ahead of time, and its supporters were just waiting for the right moment to sell the package.

The same thing is happening now with the 700 billion dollar Wall Street welfare package. The Times of London reports,

“Henry Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, met lawmakers from the Republican and Democratic parties to persuade them to hurry through the biggest financial intervention in America since the Great Depression.

The bail-out plan had been drawn up by Mr Paulson and Treasury officials over the past few weeks, but had been kept secret for fear that Congress would have time to publicly oppose such a deal.”

The crisis of incompetence on Wall Street has been clear for quite some time. So, why does the government need to hurry up now to pass legislation that deals with the problem? If the Department of Treasury could work slowly for weeks to craft the legislation, why does Congress now need to hurry up and pass it without giving it the scrutiny it deserves.

The cost of this socialist grant program for sloppy Wall Street investors is actually much greater than 700 billion dollars. It’s 700 billion dollars plus interest. This 700 billion dollar giveaway to fiscally incapable fat cats will be deficit spending, meaning that it will be money that the government borrows, and taxpayers will have to pay back later.

If I wanted to wreck the federal government of the USA, I might identify this bailout legislation as just the tool to get the job done. We all need to ask how it helps the economy for Wall Street to get a special surge of cash when that money is coming out of the pockets of hard-working American families who don’t have the luxury of sitting back and letting their investments do the labor for them.

If there really is such a rush, and if the consequences of Wall Street failure are truly so monumental, why don’t those individuals who will benefit from the government bailout pay for the scheme? Why not pass the legislation – along with a special investment income tax that will provide the money to make the deal work? Add a provision that exempts the first $75,000 in investment income, and middle class Americans won’t be harmed.

Maybe that tax on wealthy investors is not the best answer. I don’t know whether it is, and I can’t know whether it is. Congress has not been given enough time to sort through this problem – and that’s how the White House wants to play the game.

If there really is such a terrible hurry, why don’t we just declare the next week to be a financial holiday, with the markets closed? Above all else, we must not rush into reaction, especially not when the very people who have proposed the solution to this long-looming crisis are the very same people who have managed the economy into its current rotten shape in the first place?

Skepticism, not a mad dash to push through the latest financial scheme, is what’s called for.

Given that the staff of the New York office of the failed investment bank Lehman Brothers are getting 2.5 billion dollars in bonuses, even after the collapse of their company, there is substantial cause for suspicion.

6 comments to Beware The Rush To Put America 700 Billion More In Debt

  • Jim

    Well, you beat me to the punch, Peregrin. I was just lying in bed thinking about how I’ve been hesitant to write about this suddenly introduced $700 Billion package before the Congress because I didn’t know much about it. Then I realized that this is why we all need to get the Congress to hold off and stop rushing toward approval of this giveaway package. They probably haven’t had time to read it either.

  • Gioia

    What is being presented is a trojan horse thrown at the taxpayers, once more. All of these “fat cats” need to be tarred and feathered, ridden out of this country on a rail. Billions in compensations…. welcome to the United Socialist States of America. Where scoundrels are showered with golden umbrellas and the average American is a serf!!!!

  • Ralph

    Here’s a question I haven’t heard anyone ask:

    Will China be willing to bail out American lenders to the tune of $700,000,000,000.00?

    Yes, China–and the other owners of our debt. Because that’s what we’re talking about. Not the American taxpayer, because nobody’s even talking about taxing Americans to pay for this.

    So what does China think about acquiring (indirectly, of course) this extra debt. Is it going to make them any more likely to dump American dollars?

  • BD

    Its not 700billion plus interest, its MORE. the bill reads 700billion “at any one time”. So bascially its unlimited as long as its under 700 at any point

  • Anonymous

    No, seriously, I would rather shell out that extra money, and pay that extra $2000 dollars, than to know that in a month or two I will lose my job, risk my entire life savings, and maybe becoming homeless (not being able to afford rent)..and having to go through the life of great depression in the 1930s.

    What would you prefer? I’d rather pay that extra 2000 dollars.

  • JamiAtty

    I agree the whole 700 billon is very hard for the average consumer to understand. We need to do something. I would agree to hand over the money if I knew that the money would be allocated towards forecloures and helping homeowners who bought their primary residence during the “high” of the market. Big Business unfortunately is almost always going to profit but also our whole econonmy will suffer if we do nothing. There is a fire burning and someone needs to help put it out.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>