Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 312 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Replay, Repeat, Redux: When a Debate is not a Debate

Every single point made by Barack Obama and John McCain I have heard before. Every single policy position. Every little cutesy critique. Every practiced rejoinder. It’s all canned and I’ve heard it all before. This is what happens when you have a “debate” in which by the rules candidates cannot follow up on responses. It’s not a debate at all. It’s a who-can-memorize-a-cue-card-best competition. It’s boring and pointless.

You know, usually I ask what people thought of a debate, but what is there to talk about? It would be like asking you what you think of this photocopy of page 422 of War and Peace, no, not that photocopy of page 422, this one. Blah blah blah.

2 comments to Replay, Repeat, Redux: When a Debate is not a Debate

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>