Browse By

Oceanic Proportions Of The New AIG Bailout

The oceans cover more than 360,000,000 square kilometers of the surface of the Earth. Wall Street doesn’t even cover one square kilometer. Guess which one is getting the bigger bailout.

That’s right. It’s Wall Street. Comparing even just the most recent bailout of just one firm, AIG, to the bailout that the oceans are getting, the difference is staggering.

wall street oceans bailout scaleAIG is getting 30 billion dollars from the U.S. government this week, in spite of having lost its previous bailout, 62 billion dollars, in just three months. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, on the other hand, is getting just 830 million dollars from the economic stimulus bill. That’s only 2.77 percent of the bailout for AIG. The oceans, through NOAA, are receiving only 2 dollars and thirty one cents of bailout per square kilometer. If we grant AIG the generous estimate of one square kilometer of space on Earth, then we’re giving AIG 30 billion dollars per square kilometer – in this week’s bailout alone.

You may wonder whether NOAA merits a bailout of the sort that AIG is receiving. The prevailing wisdom is that there’s no comparison between the two. AIG is a huge insurance company that, financial writers say, “is so big and sprawling, so intertwined with institutions around the globe, that its downfall could set off a vicious chain reaction.” The oceans of the Earth, on the other hand, are… well, what are they? Just water?

Are we really to believe that AIG is more big and sprawling, more intertwined with the institutions of human civilization than the oceans? NOAA has responsibility for researching and protecting the ecological integrity of the oceans. Why shouldn’t it receive a budget to match the size of its jurisdiction?

There’s an oceanic ecological crisis going on right now, and it’s every bit as threatening as the global economic crisis. In fact, it may be more urgent. After all, an insurance company like AIG can be recreated. Coral reefs, once they’re destroyed, may not return for millions of years, if they ever come back.

Coral reefs around the world are dying right now, by a combination of destructive fishing practices, pollution, ocean acidification and global warming. These same problems also threaten other marine ecosystems. The bounty of the oceans, from which vast human wealth is created, is on the verge of collapsing.

The ocean’s riches are not used to hire lobbyists to beg Congress for billions of dollars. Companies like AIG, on the other hand, have the ability to launch powerful lobbying campaigns even as they’re using government money to pay for their other operating expenses. So, AIG gets the big money, and organizations like NOAA, get a pittance.

Investing in protection and restoration of marine resources will pay off very well in the future. We can’t say the same for investing in AIG. There’s good reason to believe that the 30 billion dollars that the government threw at AIG this week is gone for good, without any lasting benefit for us here in the USA at all.

2 thoughts on “Oceanic Proportions Of The New AIG Bailout”

  1. Tom says:

    All of this wrong-headed cronyism in the form of misplaced money will surely come back to haunt us – and it won’t be long before we’re a bankrupt country where chaos reigns, since climate is uninterested in our species and will change so that we can’t even grow enough food to support ourselves. This includes the oceans which are becoming ever more acidic and leaving dead zones in more and more places. Fish stocks are crashing, large predator fish are being hunted to extinction and the fact that the plankton won’t be able to survive warmer ocean temps will guarantee our inability to count on the ocean as a food source.

  2. qs says:

    Snorkeling off Great Barrier Reef: Hardworking members of Congress study global warming while snorkeling off the Great Barrier Reef. These dedicated public servants also were subjected to Australia’s topless beaches.

    “WASHINGTON — When 10 members of Congress wanted to study climate change, they did more than just dip their toes into the subject: They went diving and snorkeling at the Great Barrier Reef. They also rode a cable car through the Australian rain forest, visited a penguin rookery and flew to the South Pole.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!