Browse By

Electricity Demand Outpaces Population Increase

When I started reading a new Government Accountability Office report on the impact of new coal-burning power plants in Texas on air quality, one line stood out right away: “The Department of Energy (DOE) predicts that demand for electricity will increase nationally by 26 percent between 2007 and 2030.”

The Census Bureau’s population clock estimates the U.S. population at 307,084,125. The Bureau currently estimates that the U.S. population will be 373,504,000 in 2030, an increase of 21.6 percent.

Notice a difference? The Government Accountability Office is currently working under the presumption that electrical usage in the United States will increase at a higher rate than the population. That means that the Department of Energy assumes in its analysis that Americans will be using more electricity in the future than they are now, even though technology ought to become a great deal more energy efficient between now and then.

The Department of Energy is making the educated guess that Americans will increase their consumption of electricity because of changes of want, rather than changes of need.

It doesn’t have to be that way. We can choose to use less electricity now, and make further reductions through better technology in the future. We could be using 26 percent less electricity in 2030, rather than 26 percent more.

The estimates made by the Department of Energy are not our nation’s destiny.

3 thoughts on “Electricity Demand Outpaces Population Increase”

  1. Tom says:

    Does the estimate include widespread use of electric/rechargeable vehicles?

    If we allow them to continue building coal fired power plants global warming will continue, with all the ramifications EXCEDING expectations and probably occuring sooner (including drought, inopportune weather for crop development, increases in disease and insects that spread them, trees may develop blight or simply not tolerate the warmer temps and die off in massive numbers, the ocean will continue to heat up to the detriment of many species of fish and aqualife, etc) and we’ll be around in far fewer numbers than today. By 2030 we could be in the midst of a world-wide climatic catastrophe at worst and at best it will “just” be much hotter than now.

    What we’re doing, living the way we are, is suicidal.

  2. DUMBASSES says:

    It is global “climate change” now. When the science doesn’t add up, you just change the name of the problem.

    1. Green Man says:

      No, D. When the problem is understood to be bigger than you thought, you expand the terms you use. Global warming is just one part of global climate change, which also includes other serious problems, such as changes in precipitation and ocean acidification.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!