Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 733 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Bloodbath In Afghanistan

You might say that the blame is complicated. What happened to the civilians was very simple:

“…skin burnt black and peeling off to expose raw red muscle. Others were so badly wounded, they were incapable of crying, with their badly burnt clothes stuck to their flesh.”

“Everyone around the fuel tanker died. Nobody was in one piece. Hands, legs and body parts were scattered everywhere. Those who were away from the fuel tanker were badly burnt.”

Taliban fighters stole two fuel tankers full of diesel from foreign fighters in north central Afghanistan. One they got away with. One got stuck. So, the Taliban opened that tanker up to villagers nearby, telling them that they could take the fuel. Huge numbers of villagers swarmed to the tanker, carrying jugs and buckets – whatever containers they happened to have around their homes. It is said some Taliban fighters were still on top of it.

That’s when the bombing took place. An airplane operated by the coalition of foreign fighters attacked the stuck fuel tanker surrounded by civilians. Exactly what kind of weapon was used isn’t certain, but the tanker of diesel exploded as a result of the attack. Huge numbers of civilians died. Huge numbers were terribly injured.

Should the Taliban have hijacked the tankers? No. Should they have invited villagers to run up and take the fuel? No. Should the coalition of foreign fighters have bombed the tanker when it was surrounded by civilians? Some people are going to say yes, because that coalition is controlled by the U.S. military, or because there were Taliban there too, or because that’s just the sort of thing that happens in a war.

For me, I say no. I guess it’s a moral values thing.

2 comments to Bloodbath In Afghanistan

  • Tom

    The war is wrong from the beginning – we don’t belong there, we aren’t welcome there by the populace, and our mission has not clearly been identified except to prop up a weak government. Like in Iraq as the death toll to both civilians, the resistance, and the military and police of both countries and whoever is left of the “coalition forces” grows daily, war is just not a good idea. Atrocities are swept away as “collateral damage”.

  • qs

    I’ll vote for whoever pledges to cut funding for the occupations along with defunding all U.S. military bases in 2012 like I did last time—> Chuck Baldwin.

Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>