Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 192 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

No Senate Democratic Voices Against Patriot Act Abuses

Democratic voters have done a lot of apologizing for the leaders of their political party this year. The voters admit that Democrats in the Congress and White House haven’t kept their campaign promises, but say that we shouldn’t worry. The Democrats have been busy dealing with a lot of things, they say, and will get around to keeping their promises, later.

That excuse might apply, if one were in a generous mood, to some of the promises have simply not fulfilled. The problem is worse than simple inaction, however. In many cases, the Democrats in the White House and Congress have been actively betraying their promises, undergoing great effort to preserve and even worsen right wing policies created under Republican rule.

One of the promises that Democratic candidates made last year was that, if they could be given control of the White House and Congress, with a veto-proof majority in the Senate, then they would stop the politics of fear, and end the attacks against the Constitution begun by George W. Bush. Over the last month, however, Democrats in the Senate, led by Senator Patrick Leahy, have been moving forward a bill that would extend the most unconstitutional, abusive provisions of the Patriot Act.

Yes, Barack Obama is President, and the Democrats overwhelmingly control Congress, but the agenda of John Ashcroft is still moving forward. What’s more, the Democrats are now using the language of Dick Cheney’s politics of fear: They’re saying that if we don’t agree to sacrifice our constitutional rights, we will be in danger of attack. Will no Democrats take a stand against this betrayal of the promises of 2008?

Not this week. Though the Senate Judiciary Committee approved S. 1692, the bill to extend the attacks against our constitutional rights under the Patriot Act, at the end of last week, not one single Democrat in the Senate could be bothered to rise to the floor of the Senate to utter a word of protest.

Progressive Democrats have been presented with a clear choice. They can:

A) Agree to join their leaders in embracing the Republican politics of fear
B) Speak out clearly to Democrats in the House and Senate that if the Patriot Act’s abuses are extended, progressive support for the Democratic Party will come to an end

Will you allow your silence to be added to the silence of the Senate Democrats?

6 comments to No Senate Democratic Voices Against Patriot Act Abuses

  • They call Me...Tim

    Will no Democrats take a stand against this betrayal of the promises of 2008?

    No. Nor will they. If times were as they were pre-October 2008, then yea, sure they would. They would need a banner to rally a cause, any cause, to keep them in the spotlight of doing something inportant. But they now have bigger fish to fry and they don’t need to dismantle something they themselves use for their own gain.

    This is a dead issue for all in power. You can smoke and stew this issue all you want…no one in power will listen. You may want to get their attention on some other issue that would sting them more…like their wallets….

    • I’m not trying to get “all in power” to listen to this article. I don’t think that United States Senators read Irregular Times. I want citizens who vote to listen to this article, because the Patriot Act renewal has gotten nearly zero coverage, and what coverage there has been mostly skims over constitutional issues.

      “All in power” fundamentally get their all their power from us, and we could take it back – if we paid attention and applied our own power.

  • qs

    Maybe Kerry would have been better than Obama.

  • qs

    Some GOP congressman wants to stop Muslim activity (CAIR) within the U.S. government.

    Scott Horton Interviews Glenn Greenwald

    Glenn Greenwald, former constitutional lawyer and current Salon.com blogger, discusses the Republican brouhaha about the Islamic non-profit CAIR, the ease of tarnishing reputations with “unindicted co-conspirator” designations, vitriolic anti-Islam bigotry in Congress and the pervasive fear of an Islamic takeover of the U.S.

Leave a Reply