Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 228 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

FBI General Counsel: Constitution and Bill of Rights “Seriously Miss the Mark”

Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Federal Bureau of Investigation General Counsel Valerie Caprioni:

Those who say the FBI should not collect information on a person or group unless there is a specific reason to suspect that the target is up to no good seriously miss the mark. The FBI has been told that we need to determine who poses a threat to the national security — not simply to investigate persons who have come onto our radar screen.

James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson. They seriously missed the mark.

While the New York Times Technology section fritters away the paper’s reputation on recycled press releases, Times reporter Charlie Savage posts a real zinger today, uncovering the following:

* The FBI has been conducting surveillance in the United States of persons and groups who are not suspected of committing or planning to commit any crime.

* This surveillance has been often covert and involves undercover infiltration of social milieux and organizations.

* FBI surveillance within the United States can be based on statements of political opinion people have made.

* FBI surveillance within the United States can be based on people’s religious affiliation.

* FBI surveillance within the United States can be based on people’s ethnic origin.

Confronted with documentation of the existence of this program, FBI general counsel Valerie Caprioni became especially anxious. What was she anxious about? Well, as you saw above, she was anxious to identify our Constitution, our Bill of Rights and those who ascribe to them as “seriously off the mark.” We’ve already established that. But Caprioni was also anxious that people would come to the conclusion that an FBI program dedicated to conducting covert surveillance of people and infiltration of groups not suspected of any crime might be thought of as “spying”:

I don’t like to think of us as a spy agency because that makes me really nervous. We don’t want to live in an environment where people in the United States think the government is spying on them. That’s an oppressive environment to live in and we don’t want to live that way.

The FBI’s General Counsel didn’t say that “we don’t want to live in an environment where the government is spying on people in the United States.”

The FBI’s General Counsel said that “we don’t want to live in an environment where people in the United States think the government is spying on them.”

The FBI is spying on American people and organizations — without warrants, without probable cause, without suspicion, covertly. But the FBI asks you, please, don’t think of it that way. It would be best for the FBI if you didn’t think of it at all.

4 comments to FBI General Counsel: Constitution and Bill of Rights “Seriously Miss the Mark”

  • Tom

    Hey, how about that – they actually took George Bush’s anti-Constitutional spying policies and CONTINUED and ENHANCED them since we voted for Obama and all his make-believe change! Ain’t life grand?

    Get used to living in this fascist bankrupt country with its moral decay, an uninformed or “care-less” population, and its phony “elected government” (wow – there’s a laugh, hunh?) TOTALLY in the pocket of the Fed and Wall Street.

    Oh yeah, FUN TIMES ahead my friends! Count on it.

    • jaaaaaames

      George Bush’s “anti-constitutional spying policy”… I wasn’t aware his power and reach infiltrated the Clinton Administration:

      the Digital Telephony Act (the “Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act,” PL 103- 414, commonly known as the “National Wiretap Plan”) passed in 1995; the “Aviation Security and Anti-Terrorism Act of 1996″; and the Anti-Terrorism Law Enforcement Enhancement Act of 1996.”
      and of course the The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, United States Congressional statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq based on the intelligece provided to Bill Clinton by George Tenet who assured the US (and world) that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destrution and he would use them). Itwas signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States to support democratic movements within Iraq. The Act was cited in October 2002 to argue for the authorization of military force against the Iraqi government. That darn Bush…

  • ramone

    if they don’t want us thinking about it then, maybe, they should give up the drug-war and we’d all be so high they could pull of their world domination schemes and nobody would give a flying flitter #*>@! :)

  • ramone

    oh, i forgot, that’s why their spying! can’t dominate the world with all those dopers around. silly me.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>