Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 366 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Creationism, Fossils and the Very-Handy God Effect

Four years ago, I got my very own personally-signed copy of Jim Pinkoski’s book, A Creationist’s View of the Dinosaurs and the Theory of Evolution. This unintentionally hilarious book spins and twists and pirhouettes in an effort to rectify an account of Biblical creation with the observable reality in front of us. Essential to each of these maneuvers is the God Effect:

Jim Pinkoski explains how the fossil record proves the Biblical flood, and also explains why the fossil record doesn't match Biblical accounts

Notice how on the right, the fossil record is used (rather incorrectly) to try and prove the existence of the Biblical flood, but over on the left, the Biblical character of God is used to explain away the absence of giants in the fossil record? If (as in the panel on the right) the fossil record is to be taken as a dependable indicator of what did and didn’t happen in the past, then the absence of giant humans in the fossil record is a serious problem for people who, like Jim Pinkoski, take the Bible literally. If (as in the panel on the left) the character of God can intervene at any time in any way to accomplish anything, including the selective destruction of the skeletons of giant humans, then observations of the empirical record cannot be relied upon as a valid indicator of what has or has not happened.

Either God can and does erase physical records whenever He wants (making empirical observation an unreliable indicator of reality) or the empirical record is a reliable record of what’s happened in the past (making the Biblical account of creation an unreliable indicator of reality). Only one of these notions can be true, and if one is true the other is not.

4 comments to Creationism, Fossils and the Very-Handy God Effect

  • Very good observation. Now that you said it, I’ve seen creationists use that kind of arguments over and over. Whenever evidence “supports” their views, they accept and publicize it. When it doesn’t, they reject it.

    Pablo
    Pablo’s Origins Blog

  • Tom

    Well, see – people who believe in fables and myths can easily select to believe, invent or explain away any so-called “facts” or logic to support their created world-view. It’s all about what they want in their fairy-tale. i’m more intrigued by the American Indian versions of creation stories, or the aborigial tales of the origins of the universe and our world – much more interesting and “fabulous.” Joseph Campbell wrote a lot about this subject, if anyone is really interested in his thoughts on the subject (based on research – be forewarned). Otherwise believe what you want no matter the facts and observations of reality (they could all be delusions and your world-view “correct” – because that’s the way you want it!).

  • ramone

    my boss uses the same type of logic as pinkoski. he talks out of both sides of his mouth all the time!

  • Jim

    Someone lets us know by e-mail of this sweet dinosaurs against creationism t-shirt, printed responsibly on American Apparel t-shirts. I like it.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>