Browse By

Ameria is a Nation of Wimps

I hope that first word in the title of this article is not a typographical error.

You, see, I just read an article entitled Amerians Say Government Should Focus More on Security, Less on Civil Liberties. The article cites two polls that suggest that citizens are now sharply favoring an increase in security at the expense of constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms.

Amerians? In the article, the polls are described as referring to Americans, and that concerns me. In the United States of America I learned about in school, the people long ago had decided that they would rather live in freedom than live under a security state. So, I’m hoping that there’s some other nation named Ameria, that has cravenly decided to sacrifice its liberty for the sake of a little security.

But then, as I’m looking at a summary of one of these polls in that article, I’m seeing one reason that people might respond to that poll in favor of security more than in favor of freedom. The poll, by the Pew Research Center, asks respondents to choose one of two statements:

1. Government anti-terrorism efforts have not gone far enough to protect the country
2. Government anti-terrorism efforts have gone too far in restricting civil liberties

The results of this poll are all in the terms used. It pits protecting the country against civil liberties. The idea of protecting the country presupposes a threat, whereas civil liberties presupposes… what, a frivolous lawsuit?

When people think of civil liberties, they think of relatively superficial issues, like the right of people to choose organic food, or to wear their hair the way they like, or to join nudist colonies. The phrase “civil liberties” seems to suggest a lifestyle that some people like, but isn’t really necessary.

What if the poll asked people about “constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms” rather than “civil liberties”? What if the poll asked people simply to choose between “security” and “freedom”?

Furthermore, what if the poll didn’t preface the question by referring to “anti-terrorism efforts”, acquiescing to the presumption that the government’s surveillance and security programs are indeed anti-terrorism? (The Patriot Act’s sneak-and-peek spying powers have been found to be used almost exclusively in cases not at all related to terrorism.) If Americans, or Amerians, or Homelandians, or whatever it is that we have become, were asked simply, “Is the government going too far to provide security, or going too far to provide freedom?” would respondents have still agreed that the sacrifice of freedom’s all right with them?

3 thoughts on “Ameria is a Nation of Wimps”

  1. JennyD says:

    Great article . . . Why not do a Polldaddy poll?

  2. Tom says:

    Where is this Ameria you speak of? – i can’t find it on my map. Is this the same country that’s going to coin the Amero as the new currency to replace the dollar? If they want everyone to live in a prison society, i don’t think they’re going to find that it gives them more security. Just as the death penalty didn’t deter violent crime, surveillance cameras everywhere and spying on the entire population via internet and phone usage isn’t going to guarantee anything but unhappiness at the loss of freedoms once taken for granted. After it’s put in place, it’s too late to try to stop it.

  3. ramone says:

    i’m sure you could construct a poll that would show americans to be in favor of anything imaginable. the wording of these “polls” is always keen on a certain perspective and used to garner a certain answer. in other words, the outcome is established before the survey is even conducted.

    pollsters ask whether men would rather wear bell bottoms or no bottoms.
    well, maybe that isn’t the best example. bare bottoms might be preferred to bell bottoms.

    i’m sure someone can come up with more suitible contrived polls for our consideration. just watch CNN’s “rafferty file” for daily one-sided polling. lou dobbs was also very good at this, until the network gave him the boot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!