Browse By

Charles Dent’s Plan: Let the Obama Administration Revoke Americans’ Citizenship

Republican Representative Charles Dent of Pennsylvania has a radical plan to strip Americans of their citizenship.

I’m not exaggerating. H.R. 5166 is rather dramatically titled the Revoking Citizenship for Terrorists Act. That’s an indication right there you should be concerned. Any time a bill before the Congress talks about loving America or getting the terrorists, you can bet something unsavory is headed for your gullet. Read the bill with an eye for detail and you’ll see what I mean:

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the loss of United States citizenship by individuals who are unprivileged enemy belligerents.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

This Act may be cited as the `Revoking Citizenship for Terrorists Act of 2010′.


Section 349(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481(a)) is amended–
(1) in paragraphs (1) through (6), by striking `or’ at the end;
(2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the end and inserting `; or’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
`(8) being an unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such term is defined in section 948a(7) of title 10, United States Code).’.

Section 349(a) is pretty clear: it describes sets of people who are to lose their citizenship. Once you get past the title, you can see that the people who are going to have their American citizenship revoked are not people who have been proven in a court of law to be “terrorists”: instead, they are a new entity called an “unprivileged enemy belligerent.” If you want to understand this bill, you have to understand what exactly an “unprivileged enemy belligerent” is and how a person becomes one.

Try to look up “unprivileged enemy belligerent” in the Congress’ or even the GPO’s own copy of the United States Code and you won’t find the term in section 948a(7) as Charles Dent’s bill says you will. You have to, as this document from the Republican Policy Committee explains, look to last year’s S. 1390, a military authorization bill (which passed and was signed into law). In that bill, this is how “unprivileged enemy belligerent” is defined:

(7) UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENT- The term `unprivileged enemy belligerent’ means an individual (other than a privileged belligerent) who–
`(A) has engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners;
`(B) has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or
`(C) is a member of al Qaeda.

Note the or. People have met the government’s standard for option (B) because they gave money to the wrong charity. I’m not kidding.

And who decides that these characterizations are true? A court of law, in a trial? No. The charges never have to be proved. Since the original passage of the Military Commissions Act (which S. 1390 amended and H.R. 5166 would amend), designations have been made by a panel empowered by either the President or Secretary of Defense (see also Defense Department 2010 Military Commissions Manual, page 91) . This isn’t a trial; it’s an administrative procedure. Once that determination is made — poof! — a person becomes an “unprivileged enemy belligerent.” You are one because the government says you are.

Charles Dent’s bill adds the final cherry on top. If H.R. 5166 passes, an American citizen who is determined by the panel of the Obama Administration to be an “unprivileged enemy belligerent” will lose their citizenship. That has consequences. In the section dealing with “unprivileged enemy belligerents,” S. 1390 defines the term “alien”:

In this chapter:
`(1) ALIEN- The term `alien’ means an individual who is not a citizen of the United States.

Under S. 1390, an alien unprivileged enemy combatant loses the “Miranda right” to be told what his or her rights are, loses the constitutional right to trial by jury, loses the constitutional right to refrain from self-incrimination during interrogation, will be tried for crimes by military commission, and is not to be treated according to the provisions of the Geneva Conventions.

If Charles Dent’s bill passes, then the Obama administration will be able to administratively declare an American citizen to be an unlawful enemy belligerent without proof to a court, will strip that person of the protections of citizenship, will deny them even the right to be told what rights they have, and will be punted into the netherworld of indefinite detention without trial.

Is Charles Dent’s vision for America your vision for America?

6 thoughts on “Charles Dent’s Plan: Let the Obama Administration Revoke Americans’ Citizenship”

  1. Tom says:

    We’ve turned into WWII Germany in the space of 10 years (since Bush Jr.) but instead of Jews, we pick on anyone we don’t like: illegal immigrants, people of color, women, (“unapproved”)protesters, and people who give money to the “wrong” charities. We’re heading for mob rule (especially when the resources start running out) and ugly chaos with this kind of legislation (and the Arizona and possibly Texas laws being ramped up around the states).

    Meanwhile NOBODY in the financial sector has been prosecuted who had anything to do with the economic meltdown which is still causing massive losses of jobs and wealth (by mostly the former middle class), tax payment stability, and now bankrupt cities and towns (not to mention the currency crisis yet to play out). Now there’s a thumbnail pic of America today: the ownership class gets away with practically anything while the rest of us get screwed royally.

  2. walkie wawtmire says:

    If any of our media were doing their jobs, we would know how many felonies are being committed by both illegal and legal, uh, unwanted houseguests yet we are told herein that the U.S. = Nazi Germany.
    It may be but it’s a reverse-Hitlerism. We’re told we’re down to “11,000,000 illegals” but it’s closer to 30,000,000. Legals, including approx 7,000,000 Moslems (3,000,000 illegals) tap in at circa 60,000,000. Gang membership is gettingclose to 2,000,000.

    Both legal and illegal cash inhalers are nearing the $1,000,000,000,000 per year in:

    HUD grants
    Food Stamps
    Fuel Stamps

    Put a stop to this and our economy will rebound.

    P.S. Per Godwin’s Law, Tom loses.

    1. Jim says:

      Isn’t it awesome how you can write down numbers and they seem real and shit, walkie? I love it! Just tack on a few more zeros. Who needs a source? Oooh, let me try.

      Hey, if any of our media were doing their jobs, we would know that despite the story about only 13,000,000 space aliens in Nevada it’s closer to 40,000,000, each with 10,000 bags of potato chips (inc. 6,000 Muslim potato chips) with each potato chip bringing 3 new gang members along with it. At 7,000 potato chips per bag, that would mean that in Nevada alone the space alien population is greater than the number of dill seeds a monkey with a peg leg can kick out in a day and half with a jackhammer!

      Someone pass me my inhaler…

  3. ramone says:

    unprivileged enemy belligerent
    ahh, jim, i think they’re talking about you.

  4. walkie wawtmire says:

    Guess my made-in-Khyna calculator got the numbers all wrong. Oh well, pass the “Moslem potatoed chips,” please.

  5. walkie wawtmire says:

    Bring back Ronald Wilson Reagan (666) aka Fagin Reagan:

    faux tough guy
    faux cowboy
    faux soldier
    faux Red fighter. What we saw and heard is not what we got from Ronald Wilson Reagan (666). We got Amnesty and open borders from Fagin Reagan, the ultimate Joker.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!