Browse By

Dianne Feinstein: I Have No Facts, but this Bomb Would Have Blown Up in Three Different Places

Unpack this, the latest in Senator Dianne Feinstein’s increasingly bizarre line of justifications for unconstitutional surveillance measures. If they weren’t in place…

… two bombs would have left Dubai, headed for the United States, theoretically to Chicago — I don’t know whether this is actually fact, but to to a synagogue in Chicago, and likely would have exploded over Canada or part of the United States. So this to me is eloquent testimony of the need to provide opportunities for intelligence. This nation does still remain in jeopardy.

(Source: Minutes 2-3, Senate Intelligence Committee Video, 2-15-2011)

Got that?

1. The terrorists would have exploded two bombs in a synagogue in Chicago if not for unconstitutional intelligence activities.

2. The bombs would have exploded in the air over Canada.

3. The bombs would have exploded in the air over the United States.

4. Dianne Feinstein doesn’t know whether this is actually fact or not.

If that eloquent testimony doesn’t have you running for the hills in a Kevlar vest, I don’t know what will.

2 thoughts on “Dianne Feinstein: I Have No Facts, but this Bomb Would Have Blown Up in Three Different Places”

  1. Tom says:

    And these delirious, unaccountable, lying sacks of shit SPEAK FOR US? What a total waste of time, money and breath these people and their vaunted positions are.

    Terrorism is BULLSHIT – it was fabricated by the Bushies as justification for all the other crap we’ve had to take (from illegal, immoral and unnecessary wars to no jobs, corporate policy and no future due to the continuing ignorance at the top and no leadership on the environment). Now Obismal is continuing this wrong-headed policy with the help of these twits in Congress!

  2. Jon says:

    I can’t say that I am surprised! I have written to her twice to express my opinion against the Obama Health Care bill. On both occasions I recieved a form letter thanking me for my support of her position. In the first letter I suggested that she travel to a country where Socialist Medicine is practiced instead of having her surgury perfomed in a San Franciso, state of the art hospital. I then suggested that maybe, in keeping with her own views she should consider a walker instead of surgury.
    The response was less than dazzeling, but I now am probably on her LIST. I have no proof but I think she is a twit too, Tom.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!