Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 485 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Is There a Senatorial Dog Whistle? There Should Be.

There are legitimate reasons for halts to Senate activity. During a meeting of the Judiciary Committee this morning to consider surveillance provisions of the USA Patriot Act, Chairman Patrick Leahy called for a three-minute recess because he can only see out of one eye and that eye became obstructed, making it impossible for him to see anyone or coordinate committee activity. Senator Leahy got his eye irrigated and markup of the Patriot Act continued.

Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on the Patriot Act, March 10 2011, sparsely attendedDoes the desire for a quick snack at lunchtime measure up to that standard? Twice around the noon hour today, during consideration of consequential amendments to the Patriot Act, Senator Leahy had to stop proceedings because there weren’t enough Senators actually in the room to hold voice votes: just 2 Republicans and just 4 Democrats. This led Senator Al Franken to mutter near a microphone, “Is there a senatorial equivalent to a dog whistle? Well, there should be.”

When the Patriot Act reaches the Senate floor, will its proponents refer to “careful committee consideration”? They shouldn’t: some members of the of the Judiciary Committee, like Herb Kohl and Charles Schumer, didn’t show up for the meeting at all. Others, like Al Franken himself, were more than an hour late and wandered into policy conversations that were already halfway over.

If the Senate is going to reauthorize surveillance legislation that allows little people like you and me to be tracked without notice or probable cause, then I don’t see why Senators shouldn’t be treated the same way. But is a whistle really sufficient? Veterinary studies show the efficacy of implanted microchips and GPS collars in locating dogs; they should work for Senators, too… and just imagine how quickly they’d come running with the use of shock collars and an invisible fence or two.

Dignity, schmignity. Privacy, schmivacy. If it makes the government run on time, who cares about the antiquated notions of independence and rights… right?

1 comment to Is There a Senatorial Dog Whistle? There Should Be.

  • Tom

    i’m convinced that this is all a dog and pony show and that before long they’re just going to declare Marshall Law, take over the gas stations, food stores and banks (among other things like the water companies, electrical grid, etc.) and start corralling us up (or just shooting us). What a farce this so-called government is: we’re playing with monopoly money (that decreases in value every day), the police, homeland security and the secret spy agencies are all tracking our every move (instead of grabbing the banksters that caused this whole mess), our jobs are still being off-shored (and anyone who gets laid off may as well jump off a bridge), and the few who still have jobs – well their contracts are being abrogated (especially if you have no collective bargaining rights, but otherwise there are little to no raises and what little they increase you gets quickly gobbled up by the ever-risins costs of gas and food), and our media is all but defunct – it’s all propaganda now.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>