Browse By

Senate: If we don’t imprison people forever without charge, we’ll have to tell them what their rights are

Why did members of the U.S. Senate insist on voting this week on empowering the U.S. Government to imprison people forever without charge, citizens and noncitizens alike?

Because if the Government couldn’t imprison people forever without filing charges, it would have to tell people what their rights are.

I’m not kidding. The process of reading someone their Miranda rights is the process of the U.S. Government telling people under its power what their rights are. For instance, that “right to remain silent” is the right against self-incrimination, and it’s a constitutional right straight from the 5th Amendment.

So when members of the U.S. Senate tell you that the government must imprison people forever to keep them from being read their Miranda rights…

Senator Lindsey Graham, November 30 2011: “The question is, Are we going to change that and say in the 21st century, in 2011, every American citizen who chooses to cooperate with al-Qaida can no longer be interrogated for intelligence-gathering purposes by our Department of Defense and our intelligence community; that they have to go into the criminal justice system right off the bat, where they are given a lawyer and are read their Miranda rights? If we do that, we are going to deny ourselves valuable intelligence.”

Senator Kelly Ayotte, December 1 2011: “In our country we need the authority to, in the first instance — the presumption should be to hold those individuals in military custody so that we are not reading them Miranda rights.”

… they are telling you that in order to keep people who haven’t been convicted of any crime ignorant of their rights, they want to imprison such people for ever.

These are the new American values.

3 thoughts on “Senate: If we don’t imprison people forever without charge, we’ll have to tell them what their rights are”

  1. Dove says:

    Well, many Americans will know their rights already and beg for a lawyer. The point of keeping them indefinitely without charge (thus without trial) is that they don’t get a chance to testify against their captors and torturers. Or to phrase it like a press secretary, “All too often we find that even if someone is innocent when they are arrested, they are self-radicalized or influenced by their fellow prisoners before the interrogation process is complete[d by the accused’s full confession (unsaid)] thus making them unsafe to release into society. “

  2. Tom says:

    George Orwell would be astonished at how far we’ve fallen.

    Off-topic:
    http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/12/01/379283/suncor-tar-sands-refinery-leaks-crude-into-south-platte-river/

  3. qs says:

    Antiwar radio did an interview with an ACLU lawyer regarding the vote.

    http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/11/29/christopher-anders-3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!