Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 253 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

No Labels CoFounder Mark McKinnon: “We Don’t Have Any Special Interest Money.” Bullshit or No?

Since its founding in 2010, the 501c4 corporation called No Labels has refused to identify the names of its funders. Mock-interviewing No Labels co-founder Mark McKinnon on his comedy show this week, Stephen Colbert asked him about No Labels’ cash supply:

Stephen Colbert: Do you guys have money? Do you guys have cash? ‘Cause you’ve gotta have cash. You’ve gotta have deep pockets to play in this game.

Mark McKinnon: We don’t have a super PAC. We don’t have any special interest money.

“We don’t have any special interest money.” What’s your call on this: bullshit or no bullshit?

8 comments to No Labels CoFounder Mark McKinnon: “We Don’t Have Any Special Interest Money.” Bullshit or No?

  • Almost certainly bullshit.

    And McKinnon’s line that “we don’t have a super PAC” quickly is becoming beside the point.

    In my new essay, I highlight the following from an item that the respected election law scholar and blogger Rick Hasen wrote in early February:

    My big concern [until quite recently] was that we would see a lot of transfers of money from 501c4s to affiliated super PACs to shield the identity of donors to super PACs….[T]he reason these transfers are not taking place is that it appears the 501c4s are engaging in much more direct election-related activity than they have in the past. That is, we are seeing some 501c4s becoming pure election vehicles. The relation of 501c4s to super PACs is now like the past relation between 527s and PACs — these are now the vehicles of questionable legality to influence elections….[F]ixing the coordination rules for super PACs…seems to be fighting yesterday’s war already. The key is to stop 501c4s from becoming shadow super PACs. Yes, campaign finance reform community, it has become this bad: I want more super PACs, because the 501c4 alternative is worse!

  • Wait a minute. What makes a special interest special?

    What’s the opposite of a special interest? An ordinary interest? A mundane interest? A boring interest?

    What does this term “special interest” mean? It sounds like nonsense PR babble to me.

  • Nobody Asked Me...But,

    Applying barnyard vulgarities, as those used in the title to this article, may not earn Mr. Cook an “A” in English Composition, but he aptly “nose” what he is talking about. There is a horrible scatological odor in this room and it is becoming impossible to ignore or avoid it.

    As I have previously commented on this website, Buddy Roemer has latched on to Americans Elect to try to give life to his failed campaign, which shows that his signature issue of campaign finance reform is nothing more than a phony hypocritical trick by an old political liar. See this web page http://economyincrisis.org/content/interview-with-buddy-roemer-pt-4

    Mr. Roemer has stated that two people on the Board of AE are his supporters: Lawrence Lessig and Mark McKinnon. Mr Cook has already raised the conflict between Mr. Lessig’s campaign finance reform theme and his serving on the board of AE.
    http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2012/03/18/mr-ethics-ethics-problem-with-americans-elect-et-tu-lawrence-lessig/

    Now we find that Mr. McKinnon is also feeding at the trough of the big money secret donors, while supporting the candidate who is decrying those donors as the evil of our political system.

    Roemer, Lessig, McKinnon, and AE are all wallowing in the slop.

  • Ralph

    I’d say that Americans Elect IS the slop that Roemer, Lessig, McKinnon, and while we’re at it Anderson are wallowing in. Yep, it’s election year. Time for the billionaires to slop the piggies. Look, here comes an ethicist rooting around for a little power and attention. Seeeweeeee!

  • Stephen Kent Gray

    No bullshit on a technicality. It seems that they define all of their money as being not special interest. Also, since they are a 501c4 they are sort of like but different from a Super PAC which complicates things.

  • Dove

    From what we can see of their structure, the AE and NL donors and partners are specially interested in promoting and sharing the marketing database of AE member information.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>