A man named Chuck, founder of the International Paranormal Project, published an article today in which he confronts the question of why paranormal investigators are not regarded as legitimate scientists. He writes, “i ask you this how can this be viewed as a legit science if we cant even get along with each other.There is no team no investigator any better then the team there bashing… Does it really matter who is the best or who does the best investigation? Once again i would say no.”
How would you respond to Chuck’s argument that the scientists who are the most cooperative are the most legitimate? If you don’t agree with his ideas, what alternative suggestion would you make to paranormal investigators?