Subscribe to Irregular Times via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 845 other subscribers

New York Workers Simmer As New York Times Elitists Look Away

The New York Times is published with the motto “All the news that’s fit to print.” This morning, many New Yorkers are wondering what off-kilter criteria the Times uses to judge fitness.

may day 2012 protestYesterday, Manhattan was filled with protest. Bridges were blocked. Parks were filled. Banks were barricaded. Schools were emptied. Several marches surged through the streets. The photograph you see here shows part of a march that stretched for 12 city blocks.

These scenes were repeated in May Day Protests in about 120 other cities across the United States.

Look at the front page of the New York Times this morning, and you won’t find any information about the May Day protests, though. Instead, you’ll find a story, with a big color photograph, about how a museum in Dallas Texas is having problems with excessive sunlight bouncing off a nearby high rise condo, and another article about the struggles of a powerful corporate law firm, Dewey & LeBoeuf. There’s also a big advertisement for Louis Vuitton luxury watches. Elsewhere, the New York Times is reporting on the ideas of wealthy investor Edward Conrad, who says that income inequality is good for the nation.

What the New York Times finds to be fit for print these days seems to have a lot more to do with the lives of the rich and powerful than with the experiences of everyday New Yorkers. It’s a paper of record for the One Percent.

5 comments to New York Workers Simmer As New York Times Elitists Look Away

  • Bill

    Occupy’s (and related movements’) biggest problem with media like the NYT is that its message isn’t conducive to selling big-ticket junk like solid gold watches and luxury sedans. Time to bring back ‘radical chic’?

  • Bill

    To be fair, it must (I think) be said that the NYT magazine article on Edward Conard is a helluva good read; it does a superb job of deflating Conard’s absurd and loathsome argument that what we need is more income inequality, not less. One might hope that’s an argument which wouldn’t even need deflating but, unfortunately, it is. Recommended reading, and very timely.

  • Charles Manning (manning120)

    The loss of the NYT to the 1% and the MIC is indeed a tragedy. We now must look to sources like Irregular Times and Common Dreams to find out what’s really going on. I think the best antidote to this is strong web presence of political figures outside the major parties. The Greens are doing a good job in that area.

Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>