Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 494 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Tirade By Congressman Paul Broun On Evolution Steps Beyond Arena Of A Religious Test

Here at Irregular Times, we’re known for being both passionate and particular about the separation of church and state. Our position has been consistent, across party lines: We recognize that the Constitution prohibits the use of government powers in the United States to promote religious belief, and bans religious tests for public office. We have opposed right wing Christian fundamentalist efforts to usurp America’s secular democracy in order to promote theocratic ends, but we have also criticized the clumsy efforts to organize a political party defined by the atheist identity. We’ve debunked the crazy right wing conspiracy theories claiming that Barack Obama is secretly a Marxist Muslim spy, but we have also decried Obama’s own use of churches as tools to further his own political ambition.

creationist theocrat from georgiaWe have opposed the use of religious beliefs as a criterion for judging the worthiness of candidates for Congress and the Presidency. However, there have been times when we have noted a candidate’s religious beliefs as a point of criticism. We have done so when the candidate has crossed the line between private religious belief and public policy. When a candidate for public office promises to create government legislation or regulation in accordance with their religious beliefs, they have made their religious beliefs an unavoidable part of public debate. In these cases, the candidate’s inappropriate efforts to force their own religion onto other Americans, using the force of law, is a legitimate issue.

Recent comments by incumbent congressional candidate Paul Broun provide an opportunity to illustrate this distinction. Broun was videotaped campaigning at a church (a violation of IRS tax-exempt status by that church), and was recorded making the following comment:

“God’s word is true. I’ve come to understand that. All that stuff I was taught about evolution, embryology, Big Bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of Hell. It’s lies to try to keep me and all the folks who are taught that from understanding that they need a savior. There’s a lot of scientific data that I found out as a scientist that actually show that this is really a young Earth. I believe that the Earth is about 9,000 years old. I believe that it was created in six days as we know them. That’s what the Bible says. And what I’ve come to learn is that it’s the manufacturer’s handbook, is what I call it. It teaches us how to run our lives individually. How to run our families, how to run our churches. But it teaches us how to run all our public policy and everything in society. And that’s the reason, as your congressman, I hold the Holy Bible as being the major directions to me of how I vote in Washington, D.C., and I’ll continue to do that.”

In this statement, Paul Broun isn’t just making a profession of his private faith in supernatural spirits guiding the course of life on earth. He’s also making claims about science, which is a completely separate realm of thought from religion. Congressman Broun doesn’t seem to understand that scientific knowledge is not subject to the same sort of loose metaphorical evaluation as religious ideas are. He treats scientific data as something that can be re-adjusted according to what people wish to be true.

Most significantly, U.S. Representative Paul Broun promised to make the Christian Bible, rather than the Constitution of the United States, the ultimate source of his interpretation of U.S. law. He promised to implement Christian religion as law over all Americans, including citizens who choose not to be Christian. In doing so, Paul Broun crosses the boundary from misguided and sloppy personal thinking into unconstitutional and undemocratic public policy. Congressman Broun has allowed his religion to lead him into irrational actions in the U.S. House of Representatives, and that’s bad enough, but when Broun proposes to undermine the religious equality that is at the center of American democracy, he moves into outright disloyalty to the Bill of Rights.

A politician who is willing to go to such extremes to promote the interests of one group of citizens over all others cannot be trusted with power. That’s why, whether they’re Christian or not, the residents of Paul Broun’s congressional district in Georgia would do well to vote him out of office on Election Day next month.

2 comments to Tirade By Congressman Paul Broun On Evolution Steps Beyond Arena Of A Religious Test

  • Bill

    Thank you for covering this story. When I first read of this in Politico a few days ago my head started spinning around a la The Exorcist.

    I’m perfectly OK with any individual believing that evolution, embryology, and “all that stuff” are Lies From The Pit of Hell…partly because I so value freedom of (and from) religion, but mostly because I’ve learned that you can’t fix stupid, so you might as well try to avoid getting too worked up about it. I’m even sort-of OK with a U.S. congressman believing this crap…I figure the voters in his district are getting exactly what they obviously want and deserve.

    What I’m NOT OK with is:
    1. A physician flaunting his willful ignorance like this. I so pity this clown’s past patients. I suppose a know-nothing doctor of this sort could do an OK job so long as he restricted his practice to performing routine physicals and writing scripts for hillbilly heroin, but anything beyond that just terrifies me.
    2. A clown like Broun referring to himself as “a scientist.” A physician, per se, is no more a scientist than an auto mechanic is an engineer. Sure, a physician can become a scientist, but clearly Broun has not. Shouldn’t there be some kind of Stolen Valor Act making it illegal for ignorant untrained asshats to call themselves scientists?
    3. An important point I believe you failed to mention: in the House of Representatives, Congressman Broun sits on the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology. Words absolutely freaking fail me. This is the ultimate indictment of the malignant irresponsibility of congressional Republican leaders.

  • Tom

    Well said Bill.

    To your #3 point above: this is like the FDA being lead by a former Monsanto employee (a v.p. who will simply return to the corporation after serving his time), or clinical trials for psychiatric drugs being selectively editted to omit the ones that didn’t support the drug companys claim of “wonder drug” from which they can make bazillion$. It happens so often now that ‘our’ watchdog agencies actually work for the corporations they’re supposed to be regulating (oh, THAT’S who they’re watching out for). The same goes for Wall Street regulators who are paid by (you guessed it) the TBTF banks (and are routinely underfunded and severely undermanned), the EPA and many others we could delve into in another thread.

    Anymore, Washington D.C. is a clusterfuck.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>