Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 192 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Do NonTheists Need NonTheists In Congress To Be Represented?

U.S. Representative Peter Stark has been the first, and only, openly nontheist member of Congress (he has also been, over the last two years, tied for position of fourth most liberal member of the House of Representatives). In January, however, Stark will be retiring from Congress. He has been replaced by Eric Swalwell, who is registered to vote as a Democrat, but campaigned with the support of what he describes as “a coalition of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents”.

It remains to be seen whether Swalwell will be as reliably liberal as Stark. It seems likely, however, that Swalwell won’t be a strong supporter of the separation of church and state. Swalwell has publicly identified himself as a Christian and criticized Stark for votes seeking to uphold the First Amendment’s ban on government establishment of religion.

arizona democrat in congressAmerican nontheists have looked to Arizona for a possible nontheist replacement of Peter Stark. During this year’s campaign, they identified Kyrsten Sinema, from Arizona’s new 9th congressional district, as a nontheist. Sinema’s campaign, however, stated that she does not categorize herself as a nontheist, and simply prefers to deal with governmental issues from a secular perspective.

Does it matter whether Sinema is theist or nontheist?

The Constitution of the United States of America states that there shall be no religious tests for public office. A test requiring non-religious identity seems as inappropriate under this provision as a test requiring religious identity.

Voters choose candidates to go to Congress to do a job – working on legislation and representing the practical needs of constituents. Matters of identity aren’t part of the job description. What members of Congress believe in private isn’t relevant. What they do in public is.

Sinema has committed to respecting the separation of church and state. Nontheist voters should be satisfied with that form of representation, and leave questions of identity alone.

1 comment to Do NonTheists Need NonTheists In Congress To Be Represented?

  • David Murray

    I think that what members of Congress or any other officeholders believe in private is definitely relevant. Everyone has a belief system of some kind, be it theist, non-theist, or otherwise. Something from somewhere informs the individual’s sense of right and wrong, good and not so good, fair and unfair, etc., and they will bring this into the public sphere, which sphere by the way is not a moral vacuum. Are laws against murder and theft, for example, simply lawmakers imposing their own morality and that of their constituents on those who think otherwise?

Leave a Reply