Browse By

Obama Administration Seized Journalists' Private Phone Records

The Associated Press is reporting that the Obama Administration has acknowledged seizing two months of private telephone records from at least 100 of its journalists in at least four of its centers of operations. “It is unknown whether a judge or a grand jury signed off on the subpoenas,” the organization reports.

The Washington Post provides the following comments from the President of the Associated Press:

obama smashes press“There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad collection of the telephone communications of The Associated Press and its reporters. These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP’s newsgathering operations, and disclose information about AP’s activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know.

We regard this action by the Department of Justice as a serious interference with AP’s constitutional rights to gather and report the news.”

Were search warrants filed?

Were the phone records used to retaliate against journalists on political reporting?

How can this action be reconciled with the 1st Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press?

What legal limits to his powers of search and seizure does Barack Obama comply with any more?

Will Congress investigate Obama?

Will Democrats excuse this use of power?

Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy comments: “The burden is always on the government when they go after private information, especially information regarding the press or its confidential sources. … On the face of it, I am concerned that the government may not have met that burden. I am very troubled by these allegations and want to hear the government’s explanation.”

2 thoughts on “Obama Administration Seized Journalists' Private Phone Records”

  1. Tom says:

    They have all of our electronic communications now, including journalists’ information. The Constitutional scholar president turned out to be the worst defender of our freedoms and used his position to shred the Bill of Rights – even though it’s unconstitutional – with no public outcry from the citizenry. It’s only going to get worse.

  2. Truman says:

    Tom, I wouldn’t say that there’s no outcry from the citizenry.

    Top Senate Democrat Harry Reid: “I have trouble defending what the Justice Department did in looking at the AP,” Reid said. “I really believe in the First Amendment. I think it’s one of the great things we have as a country. I don’t know who did it or why it was done, but it was inexcusable. There is no way to justify this.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!