Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 363 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

How does the Prahlad Jani Breatharian Story Persist without Evidence?

The answer is repetition, and that says something about reliance on what we all “know” to be true.

More than three years ago, a man named Prahlad Jani who claimed to have lived for 70 years without food or water became the center of a media spectacle when Dr. Sudhir Shah called a press conference to announce an experiment in which this “breatharian” would be shut inside a room for 15 days and subject to rigorous scientific observation and data collection. At the end of the experiment, Dr. Shah called a news conference that received worldwide coverage, promising that a release of scientific data to substantiate Prahlad Jani’s claims would be forthcoming.

Since then:

In other words, there is no evidence to substantiate Prahlad Jani’s breatharian claims, and given Sudhir Shah’s agenda and refusal to share his supposed scientific “proof,” there is plenty of reason to suspect a ruse.

But when people discuss Prahlad Jani now, three years later, what do they say? To find out, I looked online and found 16 blog posts mentioning Prahlad Jani between May 1, 2013 and today. You can look at them here if you like:

(link|link|link|link|link|link|link|link|link|link|link|link|link|link|link|link)

All 16 of those blog posts about Prahlad Jani discuss the possibility that he is a breatharian. Not one of them mentions any of the evidence to the contrary, or reveals the lack of scientific evidence that would be needed to affirm the claim. 9 of the 16 blog posts refer to the 2010 “experiment” debacle in order to promote the idea that breatharianism is real.

In establishing what we “know” to be true, rationality and attention to evidence don’t prevail. Sheer repetition wins out.

2 comments to How does the Prahlad Jani Breatharian Story Persist without Evidence?

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>