Browse By

Obama Reforms To Big Brother Are Not Enough

The Los Angeles Times writes of President Barack Obama’s maneuver yesterday to defend the Big Brother electronic surveillance program begun under George W. Bush: “President Obama proposed significant new limits on the power of intelligence agencies to secretly collect vast amounts of information on Americans.”

Significant? New limits? Hardly.

there is no spyingWe already have limits on the power of U.S. government spy agencies, and they’re much more significant than anything that Barack Obama has proposed.

The limits we have come from the Bill of Rights, from the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Barack Obama wants to continue a system of electronic searches and seizures of Americans’ papers that fails to show probable cause, and fails to particularly describe the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Obama wants to continue to grab Americans’ emails and texts, to watch where Americans go on the Internet, to seize Americans’ passwords, and to listen in on their telephone calls without any search warrant. Obama wants to continue to do all this with the approval of a rubber stamp court that meets in secret, without accountability to the public.

Not one of President Obama’s proposed reforms gets anywhere close enough to restoring the trust of the American people. Obama has been extremely vague about what actual reforms he wants to create, but it is suggested that Obama wants to add a new secret lawyer, to the secret FISA court. Also, it is hinted that Obama wants to give American corporations a bigger role in helping the government to run the Big Brother spying system.

These changes are underwhelming, especially in light of Barack Obama’s broken promises on government spying in the past.

As a senator, Obama promised to vote against the FISA Amendments Act. He even promised to filibuster it. Then, he not only failed to filibuster, but voted in favor of the FISA Amendments Act.

As a presidential candidate Barack Obama promised that he would reform the FISA Amendments Act and Patriot Act if he was elected. Since Barack Obama was elected, he has repeatedly insisted that Congress renew the FISA Amendments Act and Patriot Act without reform. Obama has also purposefully prevented the activation of an oversight board that was supposed to check in on government spying and note violations of constitutional rights.

So now that President Obama wants to tamp down public anger about the Big Brother system that spies on the American people, he’s offering window dressing that he calls “reform”. It’s not nearly enough.

Obama lost credibility on this issue years ago. He’s not a President that we can believe in. There’s no basis for trust.

So, if Obama really wants to take action on this issue, the action needs to be decisive:

– Repeal the Patriot Act.
– Repeal the FISA Amendments Act.
– Disband the FISA court.
– Prohibit the National Security Agency, and all other parts of the military, from conducting any espionage within U.S. borders.
– Create and activate a Privacy Board that is independent from Executive Branch control and is fully transparent to the American people, which will publish full reports on both governmental and corporate violations of privacy in communications media – in print, Internet, audio, and video.

When Barack Obama and Congress work together to enact these reforms, then they’ll have my trust back. Until then, I see no reason to believe a word they have to say.

3 thoughts on “Obama Reforms To Big Brother Are Not Enough”

  1. Charles Manning says:

    I agree, J Clifford. He’s not a President that we can believe in, and he can’t be trusted. No president produced by our moribund, bought-and-paid-for “democracy” will deserve our confidence.

    Whatever we might object to about the pro-gun lobby, they at least profess to believe government can’t be trusted. For some reason, they don’t have the same attitude when we’re talking about the so-called war on terrorism. But they should.

    The Fourth Amendment is, for libertarians, almost sacred. But common sense, not just reverence, tells us that Patriot Act, the FISA Amendments Act, and the FISA court have to go. Terrorism is a minor problem when viewed in the perspective of any number of social ills that haven’t caused the nation to foreswear the Fourth Amendment. The GWOT is the successor to the cold war, designed to set up international antagonisms that ultimately reward the rich and powerful in our country by justifying extracting hard-earned dollars from the 99% to pay for all kinds of extravagancies, such as the monumental invasion of privacy highlighted by Mr. Snowden.

    Snowden’s disclosures were hardly new. But he found a way to connect with the MSM and thereby alert ordinary people to the breach of the Fourth Amendment. We need non-duopoly political candidates with the same sensitivities to come up other methods to equal, with regard to the major issues, what Snowden accomplished for the Fourth Amendment.

    1. J Clifford says:

      Can it happen, Charles?

      This entire scandal leaves me with an extraordinarily low opinion of the American people.

      Here we have clear evidence that the federal government, with the clear direction of the President of the United States, has been engaging in daily outrageous violations of the Bill of Rights – not just in some abstract form, but in violations against almost every single American every day of the year.

      But, what are Americans doing? They’re shrugging it off, except for a small minority. And why? It’s because they know that their favorite political party – whether that’s the Democrats or the Republicans – is tied up in the abuses. The idiotic majority of American voters cares more about whether their political team wins the debate of the day than whether they retain their constitutional rights.

      I cannot simply complain about the corrupt power brokers of the Republican and Democratic duopoly anymore, while casting the American electorate as a simple victim.

      The apathy and selfishness of the American electorate (I can’t call them a “citizenry” without gagging) is at the root of the problem, and we can’t just blame Big Government or the Corporatocracy for that. Americans are drowning in an ankle-deep puddle of superficiality.

      1. briny says:

        The problem here is that the American public has been thoroughly conditioned by our educational system to be good little factory workers. Don’t think. Do everything (consume, watch, discuss, vote, yada, yada) the same as everyone else you know. And so forth. All the slogans and behaviors are set EARLY. This is one of the reasons that the (sometimes revered) Founders did not want government in education. Unfortunately, the factory approach to education was birthed not long after the production-line was introduced by Henry Ford. It made life easier for educators and certainly turned out the type of product that mass-producing corporations were looking for both in workers and consumers. You can diagram the trends right down the years.

        I can’t see a fix for this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!