Browse By

1787 Party Wants To Run The Federal Government For Profit

Think back to American history class in high school or college. What did you learn about the reasons for the drafting of the Constitution in 1787? Did you learn that the Constitution was enacted in order to combat inefficiency?

That’s the way the 1787 Party, a new political party in the United States, seems to remember American history. 1787 is named after the year in which the Constitution of the United States was written and enacted, and purports to base its policy on a return to the values of the Constitution.

What those values? They’re spelled out in the introductory paragraph of the Constitution:
– federal union
– justice
– domestic tranquility
– defense
– general welfare
– liberty

So, how is the 1787 Party addressing these constitutional values today? Well, it isn’t.

This morning, 1787 released a message on Twitter urging its 2,800 followers to “Check out our newest blog about 1787’s plan to stop government inefficiency!”

Inefficiency? Inefficiency is never mentioned as a concern in the Constitution. The word “efficiency” was not written into the Constitution, in any of its forms, even once.

So, what are the unelected leaders of 1787 talking about? The Twitter post links to an article in which 1787 declares that “America is the largest business in the world and it needs to be run as such.” In supporting this idea, 1787 likens the federal government to Wal-Mart, and cites the libertarian Cato Institute.

If the federal government were run like a big business, as 1787 suggests, what would happen?

– Rank and file Americans would have no say in how the country was run.
– Wealth would be concentrated in the hands of the elite, even more than it is now.
– Americans could be kicked out of the country in punishment for displeasing the leadership.
– We would all be given cubicles to live in.
– Centrally-dictated goals would be determined by the federal government, and most of us would be made accountable to managers pressured to meet the goals by any means necessary.
– Our taxes would be sent to offshore banks to evade accountability.
– Any program failing to make a profit for the federal government’s top investors would be eliminated.

If 1787 had its way, and the federal government were run like a big corporation, the American way of life would be destroyed.

The idea that the U.S. federal government should be run like a business is totally contrary to the values of the Constitution. The Constitution sets up the federal government in order to represent the ideals of the American people. It does not establish the federal government in order to make a profit. The word “business” doesn’t show up in the Constitution at all. The only time “commerce” is mentioned in the Constitution is in order to point out that the federal government should keep control over commerce by regulating it.

Perhaps, in the future, despite 1787’s centralized, undemocratic organization, the political party might be taken over by citizens who have some greater degree of sense. For now, however, the few people who tightly control 1787 are so narrowly focused on short term economic goals, from a fringe libertarian perspective, that the new party seems unlikely ever to gather the support of more than one or two percent of American voters.

8 thoughts on “1787 Party Wants To Run The Federal Government For Profit”

  1. John Lewis Mealer says:

    Very good perspective J Clifford.
    When I get my cubicle, can I put up photos of my family or must it be a poster of the all empowering 1787 power brokers? I suppose we can simply pull hostile take-overs of lesser countries combine them into packages and sell them to the next largest power broker. It sure beats wars.

    Most importantly, do we all get Oonpa Loompas?

  2. Bill says:

    At my last (and I do mean last) corporate job, I was there four years and never put anything personal in my office…no photos, no miscellaneous bric-a-brac, no inspirational or scenic poster, no books, no pen and pencil set, nada. When my colleagues commented on this I’d say “Hey, I just work here, I don’t live here.”

    But what will I say at America Inc.?

    1. John Lewis Mealer says:

      I was joking, Bill. J was talking about the all of America being a cubicle. If I had an indoor corporate job other than running the show in the automotive Mfg position (spent most of my time on the floor anyway), I never added a single photo to my office except the sketches that were tacked to the wall.. And that was only because I wanted to keep track of them.

      Korky, don;t be so harsh on Americans Elect… I used their abandoned label as ballot access here in Arizona. Of course, they and others have threatened to sue me many times. It’s my way of making the best of a bad situation. The “party” is anything I decide it will be at the moment and so far, it’s just me.

      I even cleaned up my game plan booklet and per suggestions by Bill, removed many typos and exclamation points while clarifying my position. Independent is the only way to go.

    2. John Lewis Mealer says:

      Still have issues with typing! Thick finger issue?

  3. Korky Day says:

    Even worse name than Americans Elect. And worse mission.

    1. J Clifford says:

      I have to agree on the name, Korky. It seems that they didn’t even try the test of conversation on “1787”. Being a number, I’ve found that it’s difficult to write about clearly, so that people understand that I’m referring to a political party, and not a year. In spoken conversation, the confusion will be even worse.

      1. John Lewis Mealer says:

        Most people will be “told” to equate the party with slavery anyway…
        Bad planning such as that makes me wonder what could possibly happen in DC if they were in charge. But as their bylaws state “kinda, maybe, sorta”.

  4. Pingback: J Clifford: 1787 Party Wants To Run The Federal Government For Profit | Independent Political Report
  5. Trackback: J Clifford: 1787 Party Wants To Run The Federal Government For Profit | Independent Political Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!