Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 385 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Conspiracy Theorists Declare Fire-Fighting Airplane to be No-Doubt Proof of ChemTrails

“ChemTrail” conspiracy theorist Tom posted the following comment to an unrelated article yesterday:

more evidence to shrug off and explain away chemtrails:

http://beforeitsnews.com/chemtrails/2013/07/no-doubt-chemtrail-proof-for-the-sheep-who-call-them-contrails-2431040.html

Tom writes his words sarcastically, but I repeat them literally: Yes, I “shrug off” that article. Why? because its headline proclaims “No Doubt Chemtrail Proof,” then offers up the following photo:

Patent US 741314582

Notice the rhetorical trick. Despite the “No Doubt Chemtrail Proof” headline, the photo caption only poses a question: “Does this internet photo show the interior of a chemtrail plane?” Questions like these, paired with are an old supermarket tabloid trick (Headline: “Miley Cyrus Pregnancy Crisis!” Photo Caption: “Miley Cyrus Baby Bump?”). The headline seems to declare proof, without indicating what the proof might be. Sloppy readers will interpret the question as pointing to the truth, but if anyone ever asks you to show the proof, you can say about the headline “Well, we just present the case. We let readers decide.” If confronted, you can say about the question, “hey, we were just asking a question. It’s a free country. Shouldn’t we ask questions?”

The article Tom links to doesn’t answer the question, because the question’s answer is patently obvious. Go ahead, I encourage you: Look up Patent Number 7413145. What’s that patent for? A fire-fighting airplane. Yes, a fire-fighting airplane. Two decades ago, I was stuck in a southwestern forest fire myself and as I hiked out of the threatened area I watched fire-fighting airplanes dousing the area with aerially-dispersed flame retardant.

“No Doubt Chemtrail Proof” this ain’t.

P.S. If you want a hint of the standard of “proof” held by the authors of the article Tom links to, check out these supposed explanations the article offers:

The exact reasons for why they are spraying has a few Theories. Everything from Blue Beam and HAARP, to Monstanto controlling food w/Agenda 21, Biological poisoning (Morgellons), Mirroring our Atmosphere to block sun light, hiding the approach of Nibiru.. Billions in Market Investiments against food, Military/War Advantages, Corporate land grabs after decimating the farms, Even to preventing our DNA Galactic upgrades. Etc..

“Morgellons” is a well-known form of patient delusion, and Nibiru is a secret invisible death planet that was guaranteed to kill us all in 2003. And then in 2012. And apparently now, too.

21 comments to Conspiracy Theorists Declare Fire-Fighting Airplane to be No-Doubt Proof of ChemTrails

  • Bill

    Curse you, CIA! I want my damn “DNA Galactic upgrade” and I want it NOW!!!

  • Bill

    The reference to Blue Beam went right over my head (as it were). Since I like to keep up-to-date on the NWO’s nefarious Antichrist-led plans for us, in all their glorious diversity, I goog’d it and found this most enjoyable read: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Beam

    Highly recommended. Something for everyone here.

    • Jim Cook

      Well, Bill, I don’t appreciate your lack of support for fine quality inquiry here. I’ll have you know Project Blue Beam is real. Why, I have the conclusive evidence for it right here on the table, mailed to me by an unimpeachable source I’ll name in a moment. Let me walk over to my scanner and get these documents uploaded, right nowaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh…

  • Tom

    Thanks for the response! Here’s another one you can laugh at:

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/01/americans-lost-constitutional-rights.html

    How Many Constitutional Freedoms Have We Lost?

    This post explains the liberties guaranteed in the Bill of Rights – the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution – and provides a scorecard on the extent of the loss of each right. (This is an updated version of an essay we wrote in February. Since then, it has become apparent that the few rights we thought we had left are largely illusory.)

    (the gist of it)

    First Amendment

    The 1st Amendment protects speech, religion, assembly and the press:

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    The Supreme Court has also interpreted the First Amendment as protecting freedom of association. However, the government is arresting those speaking out … and violently crushing peaceful assemblies which attempt to petition the government for redress. A federal judge found that the law allowing indefinite detention of Americans without due process has a “chilling effect” on free speech. And see this and this. There are also enacted laws allowing the secret service to arrest anyone protesting near the president or other designated folks (that might explain incidents like this). Mass spying by the NSA violates our freedom of association, chilling our willingness to associate with people who are not firmly in the mainstream. The threat of being labeled a terrorist for exercising our First Amendment rights certainly violates the First Amendment. The government is using laws to crush dissent, and it’s gotten so bad that even U.S. Supreme Court justices are saying that we are descending into tyranny. For example, the following actions may get an American citizen living on U.S. soil labeled as a “suspected terrorist” today:
    ◾Having an almanac
    ◾Complaining about the taste of your tap water
    ◾Being young (if you live near a battle zone, you are fair game; and see this)
    ◾Using social media
    ◾Reporting or doing journalism (and here and here)
    ◾Having “strange odors” or “bright colored stains on clothes” (what if you eat mustard or ketchup?)
    ◾Speaking out against government policies
    ◾Protesting anything (such as participating in the “Occupy” or “Tea Party” movements)
    ◾Questioning war (even though war reduces our national security; and see this)
    ◾Criticizing the government’s targeting of innocent civilians with drones (although killing innocent civilians with drones is one of the main things which increases terrorism. And see this)
    ◾Asking questions about pollution (even at a public Congressional hearing?)
    ◾Paying cash at an Internet cafe
    ◾Asking questions about Wall Street shenanigans
    ◾Holding gold
    ◾Creating alternative currencies
    ◾Stocking up on more than 7 days of food (even though all Mormons are taught to stockpile food, and most Hawaiians store up on extra food)
    ◾Having bumper stickers saying things like “Know Your Rights Or Lose Them”
    ◾Investigating factory farming
    ◾Infringing a copyright
    ◾Taking pictures or videos
    ◾Talking to police officers
    ◾Wearing a hoodie
    ◾Driving a van
    ◾Writing on a piece of paper
    ◾(Not having a Facebook account may soon be added)

    And holding the following beliefs may also be considered grounds for suspected terrorism:
    ◾Being frustrated with “mainstream ideologies”
    ◾Valuing online privacy (and see this)
    ◾Being a libertarian
    ◾Liking the Founding Fathers
    ◾Being a Christian
    ◾Being anti-tax, anti-regulation or for the gold standard
    ◾Being “reverent of individual liberty”
    ◾Being “anti-nuclear”
    ◾“Believe in conspiracy theories”
    ◾“A belief that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack”
    ◾“Impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
    ◾“Insert religion into the political sphere”
    ◾“Those who seek to politicize religion”
    ◾“Supported political movements for autonomy”
    ◾Being “anti-abortion”
    ◾Being “anti-Catholic”
    ◾Being “anti-global”
    ◾“Suspicious of centralized federal authority”
    ◾“Fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
    ◾“A belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in … survivalism”
    ◾Opposing genetically engineered food
    ◾Opposing surveillance

    Of course, Muslims are more or less subject to a separate system of justice in America. And 1st Amendment rights are especially chilled when power has become so concentrated that the same agency which spies on all Americans also decideswho should be assassinated.

    Second Amendment

    The 2nd Amendment states:

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Gun control and gun rights advocates obviously have very different views about whether guns are a force for violence or for good. But even a top liberal Constitutional law expert reluctantly admits that the right to own a gun is as important a Constitutional right as freedom of speech or religion:

    Like many academics, I was happy to blissfully ignore the Second Amendment. It did not fit neatly into my socially liberal agenda. *** It is hard to read the Second Amendment and not honestly conclude that the Framers intended gun ownership to be an individual right. It is true that the amendment begins with a reference to militias: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Accordingly, it is argued, this amendment protects the right of the militia to bear arms, not the individual. Yet, if true, the Second Amendment would be effectively declared a defunct provision. The National Guard is not a true militia in the sense of the Second Amendment and, since the District and others believe governments can ban guns entirely, the Second Amendment would be read out of existence. *** More important, the mere reference to a purpose of the Second Amendment does not alter the fact that an individual right is created. The right of the people to keep and bear arms is stated in the same way as the right to free speech or free press. The statement of a purpose was intended to reaffirm the power of the states and the people against the central government. At the time, many feared the federal government and its national army. Gun ownership was viewed as a deterrent against abuse by the government, which would be less likely to mess with a well-armed populace. Considering the Framers and their own traditions of hunting and self-defense, it is clear that they would have viewed such ownership as an individual right — consistent with the plain meaning of the amendment. None of this is easy for someone raised to believe that the Second Amendment was the dividing line between the enlightenment and the dark ages of American culture. Yet, it is time to honestly reconsider this amendment and admit that … here’s the really hard part … the NRA may have been right. This does not mean that Charlton Heston is the new Rosa Parks or that no restrictions can be placed on gun ownership. But it does appear that gun ownership was made a protected right by the Framers and, while we might not celebrate it, it is time that we recognize it.

    The gun control debate – including which weapons and magazines are banned – is still in flux …

    Third Amendment

    The 3rd Amendment prohibits the government forcing people to house soldiers:

    No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

    While a recent lawsuit by a Nevada family – covered by Mother Jones, Fox News and Courthouse News – alleges bodily violation of the Third Amendment, such literal violation is rare today. However, the NSA is stationing “digital troops” within our homes, taking over our computers and phones, and interfering with the quiet use and enjoyment of our houses. As such, the NSA is arguably violating our Third Amendment rights every single day.

    And given that the Founding Fathers warned against standing armies and foreign entanglements, saying that overgrown military establishments destroy our liberty, and given that economists such as Nobel prize winner Joe Stiglitz have demonstrated that large military budgets and war destroy our economy, and make the American people poor, being forced through taxes to pay for a bloated military-industrial complex is at least analogous to being forced to quarter troops.

    Fourth Amendment

    The 4th Amendment prevents unlawful search and seizure:

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    But the government is spying on everything we do … without any real benefit or justification. Indeed, experts say that the type of spying being carried out by the NSA and other agencies is exactly the kind of thing which King George imposed on the American colonists … which led to the Revolutionary War. And many Constitutional experts – such as Jonathan Turley – think that the police went too far in Boston with lockdowns and involuntary door-to-door searches.

    Fifth Amendment

    The 5th Amendment addresses due process of law, eminent domain, double jeopardy and grand jury:

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    But the American government has shredded the 5th Amendment by subjecting us to indefinite detention and taking away our due process rights. The government claims the right to assassinate or indefinitely detain any American citizen on U.S. citizen without any due process. And see this. As such, the government is certainly depriving people of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. There are additional corruptions of 5th Amendment rights – such as property being taken for private purposes. And the right to remain silent is gone. The percentage of prosecutions in which a defendant is denied a grand jury is difficult to gauge, as there is so much secrecy surrounding many terrorism trials.

    Sixth Amendment

    The 6th Amendment guarantees the right to hear the criminal charges levied against us and to be able to confront the witnesses who have testified against us, as well as speedy criminal trials, and a public defender for those who cannot hire an attorney:

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

    Subjecting people to indefinite detention or assassination obviously violates the 6th Amendment right to a jury trial. In both cases, the defendants is “disposed of” without ever receiving a trial … and often without ever hearing the charges against them. More and more commonly, the government prosecutes cases based upon “secret evidence” that they don’t show to the defendant … or sometimes even the judge hearing the case. The government uses “secret evidence” to spy on Americans, prosecute leaking or terrorism charges (even against U.S. soldiers) and even assassinate people. And see this and this. Secret witnesses are being used in some cases. And sometimes lawyers are not even allowed to read their own briefs. Indeed, even the laws themselves are now starting to be kept secret. And it’s about to get a lot worse.

    Seventh Amendment

    The 7th Amendment guarantees trial by jury in federal court for civil cases:

    In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

    Technically, this right is still being respected. However, financial sheninagins have made it very difficult for most Americans to be able to enjoy this right. Specifically, the austerity caused by redistribution of wealth to the super-elite is causing severe budget cuts to the courts and legal assistance institutions. Moreover, there are two systems of justice in America … one for the big banks and other fatcats, and one for everyone else. The government made it official policy not to prosecute fraud, even though fraud is the main business model adopted by Wall Street. Indeed, the biggest financial crime in world history, the largest insider trading scandal of all time, illegal raiding of customer accounts and blatant financing of drug cartels and terrorists have all been committed recently without any real criminal prosecution or jail time. On the other hand, government prosecutors are using the legal system to crush dissent and to silence whistleblowers. And some of the nation’s most powerful judges have lost their independence … and are in bed with the powers-that-be.

    Eighth Amendment

    The 8th Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment:

    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

    Indefinite detention and assassination are obviously cruel and unusual punishment. The widespread system of torture carried out in the last 10 years – with the help of other countries – violates the 8th Amendment. Many want to bring it back … or at least justify its past use. While Justice Scalia disingenuously argues that torture does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment because it is meant to produce information – not punish – he’s wrong. It’s not only cruel and unusual … it is technically a form of terrorism. And government whistleblowers are being cruelly and unusually punished with unduly harsh sentences meant to intimidate anyone else from speaking out.

    Ninth Amendment

    The 9th Amendment provides that people have other rights, even if they aren’t specifically listed in the Constitution:

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    We can debate what our inherent rights as human beings are. I believe they include the right to a level playing field, and access to non-toxic food and water. You may disagree. But everyone agrees that the government should not actively encourage fraud and manipulation. However, the government – through its malignant, symbiotic relation with big corporations – is interfering with our aspirations for economic freedom, safe food and water (instead of arsenic-laden, genetically engineered junk), freedom from undue health hazards such as irradiation due to government support of archaic nuclear power designs, and a level playing field (as opposed to our crony capitalist system in which the little guy has no shot due to redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the super-elite, and government support of white collar criminals). By working hand-in-glove with giant corporations to defraud us into paying for a lower quality of life, the government is trampling our basic rights as human beings.

    Tenth Amendment

    The 10th Amendment provides that powers not specifically given to the Federal government are reserved to the states or individual:

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    Two of the central principles of America’s Founding Fathers are:

    (1) The government is created and empowered with the consent of the people and (2) Separation of powers

    Today, most Americans believe that the government is threatening – rather than protecting – freedom. We’ve become more afraid of our government than of terrorists, and believe that the government is no longer acting with the “consent of the governed“. And the federal government is trampling the separation of powers by stepping on the toes of the states and the people. For example, former head S&L prosecutor Bill Black – now a professor of law and economics – notes:

    The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the resident examiners and regional staff of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency [both] competed to weaken federal regulation and aggressively used the preemption doctrine to try to prevent state investigations of and actions against fraudulent mortgage lenders.

    Indeed, the federal government is doing everything it can to stick its nose into every aspect of our lives … and act like Big Brother. Edward Snowden showed us that the NSA spying programs “were never about terrorism: They’re about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They’re about power.”

    Conclusion: While one or two of the liberties enshrined in the Bill of Rights still exist, the vast majority are under heavy assault.

    Other Constitutional Provisions … and The Declaration of Independence

    In addition to the trampling of the Bill of Rights, the government has also trashed the separation of powers enshrined in the main body of the Constitution. For example, the NSA is spying on Congress. The government is also engaging in activities which the Founding Fathers fought against, such as taxation without representation (here and here), cronyism, deference to central banks, etc. As the preamble to the Declaration of Independence shows, the American government is still carrying out many of the acts the Founding Fathers found most offensive:

    He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures. [Background] He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power. [Background here, here and here] *** He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: [Background] *** For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences [Background] *** He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation. [Background] *** He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us. [Background here, here and here]

  • Tom

    You know what’s even more weird than chemtrails is that there’s so much pollution in our environment that it’s already in newborns’ bloodstreams and bodies as they arrive. With Fukushima now spewing untold amounts of lethal radiation into the oceans and atmosphere, we can forget about chemtrails as any kind of immediate threat because it won’t matter in the coming years – it’s just icing on the deadly cake of civilization.

    Well, thanks again for responding to my efforts to try to get you to focus on tangible and immediate threats from living the way we are. I appreciate this blog and all its writers and commenters, whether they agree with me or not. I would absolutely LOVE to be completely wrong about all this stuff, but it doesn’t look it from here.

    Oh, and do you really have a folder or ‘tag’ marked “tom”? Hahaha, that’s great.

    Tags: airplane, chemtrails, conspiracy, contrails, fire fighting, morgellons, nibiru, patent, proof, tom | Category: Mysteries

    • Jim Cook

      I create tags for every post so they can be found again. This one’s about you.

      I refuse to let your rhetorical slip glide by, Tom. You weren’t trying to get me to focus on “tangible and immediate threats.” You were trying to get me to focus on an intangible, vague, unsubstantiated rumor linked by the authors to a secret invisible planet and people who believe textile fibers are out to get them.

  • I wrote the article above in question and my referring to other “Theories” of chemtrailing was all that I come across no matter how far fetched. Some of which may or may not be true.. One thing is certain.. They are spraying at an alarming rate.. One only need to LOOK UP!

    What (Barium Aluminum oxides etc) and what it is for is yet to be made totaly clear. Any who try to discredit this because of knit-picking the post I wrote are deliberately spreading dis-info. One only need look up to see something is NOT RIGHT! And it helps if they are at least 25 or over before this crap is dominating our skies now being called natural. I remember clear blue skies and CONTRAILS lasting only seconds.. NOT ALL DAY Spreading outward.

    There are over 160 related easily searchable Patents.. And the ones I chose are directly connect to CIA’s nefarious evergreen.

    It sickens me people like you exist.. Don’t you realize you are breathing this crap in as well? Explain the PH levels and the toxic levels found atop Mount Shasta.. Entire regions, 1,000’s of acres simply dying off because of it..
    GMO, Aspartame, fluoride, on and on.. They are clearly feeding us Neurotoxins.. Kind of reminds me how the NAZI used Fluoride to make docile prisoners.

    I guess OP Paper Clip has taken over the OSS now called CIA.

    Either you are an Ignorant useful idiot or complicit. Simple as that!

    LedaOhio9

  • Tom

    Ok, that’s fine, Jim. Believe what you want. Remember how much crap you gave me about the BP oil disaster in the Gulf when I said it may be the beginning of the end? Well, it’s still there and has wreaked havoc on the loop current that’s part of the thermohaline cycle (in addition to all the damage to the fishing and shrimping industries and the wetlands in the exposed area) . So it has definitely effected the climate and weather patterns and hence – the ability to grow enough food in many areas. The consequences are on-going and didn’t stop when BP paid a meager fine. It’s never been fixed and won’t be.

    I don’t care about chemtrails, as they’re irrelevant (or a mere footnote, if they’re true) to the steady destruction of our environment via industrial civilization, capitalism, factory farming and Fukushima. We’ll be extinct before mid-century the way we’re going. You go ahead and write about politics, like it’s changing anything for the better. i’ll keep reading and posting as long as you let me and truly appreciate your blog.

    Listen (it’s not even 10 minutes long):

    • J Clifford

      Here’s the thing, Tom: The end is The End. Not just hard times. The End. Using extreme language like that invites easy dismissal, don’t you think?

  • I have updated the post in question. Re-Load it.. and still try to deny it!

    Hold Control and tap the F5 key while on he page to tell your proxy server to grab new content if you do not see the new video that has been added.
    Here: http://b4in.info/aPz3

  • My REPLY TO:
    .paste.
    Jim Cook
    LedaOhio9, a scan of the Irregular Times website with two popular website malware detectors leads to two sparkling clean reports.
    I do admit that we’re hiding the death planet Nibiru behind our backs, though.
    .end.

    What ever site or detector you’re using Jim that is giving this site a clean bill of health is misleading. I just did a screen capture of the Malware Alert I get each time I load this site for your viewing. And then, when making a post such as this one.. I get another alert of cross site scripting also screen captured.

    MALWARE ALERT SCREEN CAP:
    Direct Link: http://beforeitsnews.com/contributor/upload/38227/images/Malware-Warning.JPG

    CROSS SITE SCRIPTING ALERT SCREEN CAP:
    Direct link: http://beforeitsnews.com/contributor/upload/38227/images/CrossSiteScripting.JPG

    • Jim Cook

      LedaOhio9,

      “Cross Site Scripting” means this: JetPack is a feature of the WordPress software we use on this server to carry out services such as filtering for spam, spell-checking and a subscription service for readers. All above board and not malware. You can read about it here: http://jetpack.me/

      I think this is an indication that your threshold for identifying a conspiracy is set fairly low.

  • CRAP.. I take that Malware alert back.. It was an email alert that happened to popup when loading this site.. My sincere apologies to the site owner / creator.. But, the cross site scripting is correct..

  • # 1 NWO Hatr

    Wow! Kudos, Jim. You’re one of the most obvious disinformationalists I’ve seen to date, and you actually have an audience (miniscule though it may be). You should consider hooking up with that Zionist shill, AJ. I’m surprised Leda even bothered to post here.

    Come on over to From The Trenches World Report sometime. We post nothing but the truth there, and we eat clowns like you BEFORE lunch all the time.

    btw, you’ll find me posting there every day as # 1 NWO Hatr.

    Thanks for the laugh.

    • # 5 Most Fab Har Stylst

      Not true, “#1″!

      I happen to know that hate the NWO more than you do! That, logically, makes you a liar!

      You must, therefore, be lying when you say that you post nothing but truth at the Fromt The Trenches World Report!

      Rationally, we can see that you aren’t even laughing when you type this, you disingenuous fool!

      Through this brilliant use of deduction, I can determine that you are one of the most obvious shills, paid to write disinformation for the occult committee of emperor penguins that, through mail-order catalogs and Twitter, secretly controls the world! There is no other possible conclusion!

      Come over to read other plain truths like these at my online newsletter: From My Right Armpit!

      As a successful survivor of five World Wars (seven of them invisible), I am uniquely qualified to spray spittle in the face of your neo-realist collaboration!

      • # 1 NWO Hatr

        As my favorite cartoon character, Bugs Bunny, used to say “WHAT A MAROON!!!”

        I’m about as much a shill as you are a Rothschild.

        Idiot.

    • Jim Cook

      Note the lack of facts or evidence from “#1 NWO Hatr.” That’s all I need to say.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>