Enter your email address to subscribe to Irregular Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 218 other subscribers

Irregular Times Newsletters

Click here to subscribe to any or all of our six topical e-mail newsletters:
  1. Social Movement Actions,
  2. Credulity and Faith,
  3. Election News,
  4. This Week in Congress,
  5. Tech Dispatch and
  6. our latest Political Stickers and Such

Contact Us

We can be contacted via retorts@irregulartimes.com

Does Art Really Overcome Prejudice?

This morning, I came across a quote from a fellow named Andre Gide. He was a French author and writer who won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1947.

Gide was kind of a big deal, in his day, but still, I was taken aback at the categorical declaration of his words: “There is no prejudice that the work of art does not finally overcome.”

Is this true? Does art overcome all prejudice? I thought I’d check on that, by looking at the impact of art in the time Andre Gide. Here’s a taste of what I found:

nazi art

The Nazi Party employed many artists. Adolph Hitler was himself a painter.

Let’s not get carried away with the idea that art, as a category of communication, is inherently opposed to prejudice.

Art may sometimes oppose prejudice, but it can just as easily be used to support prejudice. Beauty is not always beneficial.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>