Browse By

News From Occupy Washington?

I was a little surprised this morning when I saw an announcement on Twitter that Occupy Washington has released its latest online newsletter.

occupy washington 2014

I was even more surprised when I discovered that the Occupy Washington newsletter, “Based on #OccupyTogether – a group that occupies McPherson Square in Washington DC,” showed nothing but photographs of Justin Bieber. I was there when Occupy Washington began, and it didn’t look like this.

But then, the Occupy Movement never began with any goals, or specific grievances, or centralized control. The idea was that people would show up, and then things would just sort of happen.

Well, now Justin Bieber pictures are happening. Who is to say this isn’t an authentic manifestation of the Occupy Movement? I certainly don’t see anyone else trying to do anything with Occupy Washington.

Pouty photographs of teen idols certainly have done a better job of occupying bits of turf in Washington DC than protesters have.

occupy justin bieber

3 thoughts on “News From Occupy Washington?”

  1. David Kantz says:

    If the interest here is actually regarding “Daily Movement News and Resources”, consider turning to If the interest is more about criticizing Occupy D.C. for having no control over its name or that whoever they are appear to be Bieberheads, you might also take a look though their “archives” (of which there appear to be none) and notice that at the bottom center of the on-line Newspaper’s page is a handy button accessing “About Paper.Li”.

  2. Tom says:

    Here’s some news about Washington:

    It’s Not Just Politics That’s Broken–The Status Quo’s Model of “How the World Works” Is Broken

    The Status Quo is dysfunctional because its model of how the world works is broken.

    Much has been written about the dysfunction in Washington D.C. Pundits have been wringing their hands for years over the rise of bitter partisan politics and the resulting gridlock. The impact of this–what I have termed profound political disunity–extends beyond the narrow confines of domestic politics, a reality reflected in Foreign Affairs new survey of our winter of political discontent, Dysfunction Junction.

    But all these discussions of our dysfunctional politics ignore the larger truth, which is the entire model of the Status Quo is broken. Even if reformers succeeded in ridding the political system of cronyism and favors-for-campaign-contributions–two essentially impossible reforms, given the legalistic cover provided for cronyism and bought and paid for representatives, the basic model of “how the world works” that dominates the world-view of leaders across the political spectrum would remain broken.

    There are only three alternatives:

    1. The current gridlock continues, and the policies in place grind on with minor tweaks.

    2. The Democrats win a sweeping victory and are able to unilaterally impose their reforms.

    3. The Republicans win a sweeping victory and are able to unilaterally impose their reforms.

    Why do we know the entire model is broken? Because all three alternatives lead to a continuation of the same ruinous model of “how the world works”:

    1. A continued reliance on Keynesian Cargo Cult “stimulus,” i.e. borrowing and blowing trillions of dollars to prop up inefficient, bloated, corrupt, wasteful crony-capitalist cartels and politically untouchable fiefdoms.

    2. The continued destruction of open, transparent markets via intervention by the central state and bank.

    3. The continued expansion of the Welfare State, i.e. entitlements such as Medicaid and ObamaCare subsidies and implicit entitlements such as farm price supports, corporate tax breaks, mortgage interest deductions, etc.

    4. The continued expansion of the National Security State, whose premises are A) everyone on the planet is guilty until proven innocent and B) only Total Information can protect “us” (i.e. the National Security State itself) from threats.

    5. The continued erosion of civil liberties via death by a thousand cuts.

    6. The rising dependence on borrowed money to fund standard government services.

    7. The rising dependence on manipulated/gamed statistics to manage perceptions that the Status Quo is eternal, powerful and improving everyone’s lives, even as it serves the narrow interests of self-serving Elites and insiders.

    8. The expansion of a Permanent War State that recognizes no boundaries between domestic and international threats, hence the militarization of local police forces and the rise of private mercenaries in the guise of for-profit domestic prisons and police forces.

    9. A central bank (the Federal Reserve) that will continue to support the most rapacious, opaque and self-serving financial Elites with free money for financiers.

    10. The continuing purchase of political favors by monied Elites via lobbying and campaign contributions.

    11. An ever-rising dependence on generating the appearance of stability, transparency, competence and expertise as a substitute for actual stability, transparency, competence and expertise. In other words, an expanding reliance on gaming dysfunctional systems rather than actually repairing dysfunctional systems.

    12. An increasing reliance on zero-interest rates, debt and free money for financiers as the “fix” for every economic ill.

    The Status Quo is dysfunctional because its model of how the world works is broken. It won’t matter if gridlock remains in place or one of the parties gets to impose its “brand” of policy-tweaks; since no one on the political spectrum has any concept that the current model described in these 12 points is broken, fixing the political dysfunction won’t fix the systemic dysfunction.

  3. David Kantz says:

    In my opinion, the evidence stands against your: “There are only three alternatives:” and “no one on the political spectrum has any concept that the current model described in these 12 points is broken”.

    I’m in general agreement with view of the status quo you’ve described, but your suggestion that there are no practical and available alternatives is propped up on an inferred assumption that the status quo is sustainable as far into the future as you care to view. Your dozen doesn’t account for the reality that an accumulating variety of “carrying capacities” and “tipping points” continue to be exceeded nor that there are myriad citizen groups discussing and taking actions that encourage and support more just redesigns of these systems.

    At some future point, this existing status quo will terminate. In my opinion, the relevant question is whether the available public wisdom will emerge to nurture a more just and more sustainable future? and if so, what variety of options will be at the heart of each of those experiments and how will real-time feedback be implemented? Or whether cynicism (such as you’re expressing) and (probably more commonly) indifference will “inevitably” lead to impotence (fiddling while Rome burns) as the system continues to collapse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!