Browse By

What Journalists Are Getting Wrong About Jeb Bush And The Decision To Invade Iraq

This week, Americans have watched Jeb Bush careen wildly through a series of answers to a simple question: If he had been President in 2003, knowing what we know now, would he have invaded Iraq.

First, Jeb Bush said proudly that yes, he would invade Iraq all over again, just like his brother George W. did. Then, he said he didn’t really know if he would. Then, he said that the question was irrelevant. Then, he said that he wouldn’t engage in hypotheticals, and that journalists ought to be ashamed of themselves for insulting American soldiers by asking questions about the Iraq War.

jeb bush kissy faceFinally, yesterday, Jeb Bush arrived at the following answer to the question: “If we’re all supposed to answer hypothetical questions, knowing what we know now, what would you have done,” he said, “I would have not engaged. I would not have gone into Iraq.”

This is supposed to be his final answer, the one that the entire nation can get behind. The Jeb Bush for President campaign-that-is-not-officially-yet-a-campaign has calculated that Americans will all shrug, and say, “Oh, okay. Well, we all know now the Iraq War was a disaster, but who could have predicted that things would have gone so badly?”

What this response to Jeb Bush’s newest version of his ever-shifting foreign policy pose is missing, and what American journalists seem to be missing as well, is the acknowledgement that presidents of the United States do not make decisions about past wars based on information they gather after the wars are complete. They make decisions about whether to make war in the present, based on a combination of present knowledge and hypothetical futures.

We all already knew what Jeb Bush’s position on the Iraq War was. He made it back in 2003.

Jeb Bush was 100 percent in favor of the sloppy invasion of Iraq. That’s all we really need to know.

If Jeb Bush had been in the Oval Office in 2003, he would have made the same stupid mistake that his brother made. If he wins the presidential election in 2016, he will be likely to make similar stupid decisions, and bring our country into further troubles.

Jeb Bush didn’t just mildly and meekly acquiesce to the apparent inevitability of war against Iraq. He loudly and proudly applauded it. He urged the country to get behind the rushed invasion plan.

Many Americans didn’t do what Jeb Bush did. The debate shouldn’t be about what anyone would have done, given what we know now. It should be about what politicians did, given what they knew in 2003. There were many Americans who spoke up loudly in opposition to the war. There was a long debate in Congress. There were protests in the streets. So, it’s not as if people can only see now that the invasion of Iraq was an idiotic idea. Many people had the wisdom to perceive the problems with the war as it was being planed.

Jeb Bush did not display that wisdom.

It’s not just a problem with Jeb Bush, of course. All of the Republican presidential candidates – with the possible exception of Rand Paul – supported the invasion of Iraq in 2002. They were cheerleaders for the idiotic war, and they continued to defend it vigorously long after the war was shown to be based on falsehoods. They made the same mistake that George W. Bush made, and would make similar mistakes in the future, if elected President in 2016.

To be fair, it’s a problem for Hillary Clinton, too. I was a constituent of Clinton when she was a United States Senator. Like many fellow New Yorkers, I sent messages to her office pleading for a vote against the resolution approving war against Iraq.

Hillary Clinton didn’t listen. She made the same stupid mistake that Jeb Bush made – and for ten years, she didn’t even admit that it was a mistake. Clinton marched our nation off to war, in lock step with the Bushes.

Jeb Bush doesn’t come out of this week looking like a competent leader. Neither does Clinton.

For our next President, we need a leader who, in 2003, given what was known then, was brave enough to say no to war.

We need more presidential candidates like Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein, both of whom were strong opponents of the Iraq War from the start.

2 thoughts on “What Journalists Are Getting Wrong About Jeb Bush And The Decision To Invade Iraq”

  1. Ella says:

    Who decided the Iraqi war was a disaster? Can you give facts that indicate that it was the removal of a brutal dictatorship that caused whatever it is that you are calling a disaster? What specifically is the disaster? If you saw a man in a mask entering your home with something in his fist, and you wife and children were inside sleeping, would you sit around and wait till he came back out to find out if he meant harm? Or maybe to find out what side effects might occur after the fact?

    Hypothetical are just that, guessing what you might have done had you been able to go to all possible futures before you made a decision. Presidents do that to the best of their ability and make decisions based on facts that are not commonly known. It has to be that way so you do not tell the thief you are going to stop him so he can plan ahead to defeat you before you can stop him.

    The ‘journalist’ that asked that question was seeking inflammatory conjecture. Obviously the person seeking sensationalism cannot find anything worth while to accuse the possible future candidate of or he wouldn’t waste his/her time boring the public with such nonsense. The Republican field is open to Democratic debate and competition. Jeb Bush has a lineage of successful relatives, so what? Are you like you father or mother in every way? Has your personal life experience been the same, in every way? Is there someone in your family that you respect and listen too? Does that mean that you can tell 100% that, because of that relatives response to a question, that you would follow his/her advise? Follow his/her advise? Not if you are like most relatives!

    The Democrat Party is virtually an unchallenged field. That candidate doesn’t even feel like she has to speak to the journalists that do ask questions. Ask yourself why that would be. Try using the imaginative energy for finding facts that are relevant to the subject of a possible future President of our country. Rather you can keep finding out things about Bill and Hillary Clinton like:
    who are nearly considered already nominated for the candidacy of the Democratic Party. Or maybe take a look at Elizabeth Warren. She is looking better everyday.

    1. J Clifford says:

      Who, in this metaphor, Ella, was the man in the mask entering the house of the United States of America?

      You want to know why people say that the Iraq War was a disaster? Look at this article by Peregrin Wood, which compares the dire predictions of Bernie Sanders about what would happen if we went to war in Iraq, with what actually happened:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!