Browse By

An Open Letter From Senator Ben Sasse

Now that Donald Trump has the Republican presidential nomination all wrapped up, and Hillary Clinton would have to be indicted on war crimes to miss getting the Democratic nomination, Republican U.S. Senator Ben Sasse from Nebraska has published the following open letter to Americans who are feeling that neither candidate is a reasonable choice.

I’m not putting this here because I agree with Sasse. I disagree with just about everything that he says. Calling Donald Trump “liberal” is nuts. I’m posting this here because I think what he has to say is worth reacting to, and I’d like to hear your reactions.


TO: Those who think both leading presidential candidates are dishonest and have little chance of leading America forward:
(…or, stated more simply)
TO: The majority of America:

Note: If you are one of those rare souls who genuinely believe Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are honorable people – if they are the role models you want for your kids – then this letter is not for you. Instead, this letter is for the majority of Americans who wonder why the nation that put a man on the moon can’t find a healthy leader who can take us forward together.

I want to tell you about four unsolicited conversations from the Fremont Wal-Mart this morning:

**Retired union Democrat meat-packer:
“What the heck is wrong with that city where you work? Why can’t they give us a normal person? Is it really so hard?”
Me: “Actually, it is for them – because most people in DC buy the nonsense that DC is the center of the world. You and I, despite our party differences, both agree that Fremont is the center.”
Union Democrat (interrupting): “…Because this is where my grandkids are.”

**Young evangelical mom:
“I want to cry. I disagree with Hillary Clinton on almost every single thing – but I will vote for her before Trump. I could never tell my kids later that I voted for that man.”

**Middle-aged Republican male (more political than the other folks):
“It feels like the train-car to hell is accelerating. Why is DC more filled with weirdos and yet more powerful at the same time? How do we slow this down long enough to have a conversation about actually fixing our country?”

**Trump supporter (again, unsolicited):
“Please understand: I’m going to vote for him, but I don’t like him. And I don’t trust him – I mean, I’m not stupid. But how else can I send a signal to Washington?!”
I’ve ignored my phone most of today, but the voicemail is overflowing with party bosses and politicos telling me that “although Trump is terrible,” we “have to” support him, “because the only choice is Trump or Hillary.”

This open letter aims simply to ask “WHY is that the only choice?”

Melissa and I got the kids launched on homework, so I’ve been sitting out by the river, reflecting on the great gap between what folks in my town are talking about, and what folks in the DC bubble are talking about.

I trust the judgment of this farm town way more than I trust DC. And so I’d like to share a dozen-ish observations on these Wal-Mart and other conversations today:

Washington isn’t fooling anyone — Neither political party works. They bicker like children about tiny things, and yet they can’t even identify the biggest issues we face. They’re like a couple arguing about what color to paint the living room, and meanwhile, their house is on fire. They resort to character attacks as step one because they think voters are too dumb for a real debate. They very often prioritize the agendas of lobbyists (for whom many of them will eventually work) over the urgent needs of Main Street America. I signed up for the Party of Abraham Lincoln — and I will work to reform and restore the GOP — but let’s tell the plain truth that right now both parties lack vision.

As a result, normal Americans don’t like either party. If you ask Americans if they identify as Democrat or Republican, almost half of the nation interrupts to say: “Neither.”

Young people despise the two parties even more than the general electorate. And why shouldn’t they? The main thing that unites most Democrats is being anti-Republican; the main thing that unites most Republicans is being anti-Democrat. No one knows what either party is for — but almost everyone knows neither party has any solutions for our problems. “Unproductive” doesn’t begin to summarize how messed up this is.

Our problems are huge right now, but one of the most obvious is that we’ve not passed along the meaning of America to the next generation. If we don’t get them to re-engage — thinking about how we defend a free society in the face of global jihadis, or how we balance our budgets after baby boomers have dishonestly over-promised for decades, or how we protect First Amendment values in the face of the safe-space movement – then all will indeed have been lost. One of the bright spots with the rising generation, though, is that they really would like to rethink the often knee-jerk partisanship of their parents and grandparents. We should encourage this rethinking.

These two national political parties are enough of a mess that I believe they will come apart. It might not happen fully in 2016 – and I’ll continue fighting to revive the GOP with ideas — but when people’s needs aren’t being met, they ultimately find other solutions.

In the history of polling, we’ve basically never had a candidate viewed negatively by half of the electorate. This year, we have two. In fact, we now have the two most unpopular candidates ever – Hillary by a little, and Trump by miles (including now 3 out of 4 women – who vote more and influence more votes than men). There are dumpster fires in my town more popular than these two “leaders.”

With Clinton and Trump, the fix is in. Heads, they win; tails, you lose. Why are we confined to these two terrible options? This is America. If both choices stink, we reject them and go bigger. That’s what we do.

Remember: our Founders didn’t want entrenched political parties. So why should we accept this terrible choice?

So…let’s have a thought experiment for a few weeks: Why shouldn’t America draft an honest leader who will focus on 70% solutions for the next four years? You know…an adult?
(Two notes for reporters:
**Such a leader should be able to campaign 24/7 for the next six months. Therefore he/she likely can’t be an engaged parent with little kids.
**Although I’m one of the most conservative members of the Senate, I’m not interested in an ideological purity test, because even a genuine consensus candidate would almost certainly be more conservative than either of the two dishonest liberals now leading the two national parties.)

Imagine if we had a candidate:
…who hadn’t spent his/her life in politics either buying politicians or being bought
…who didn’t want to stitch together a coalition based on anger but wanted to take a whole nation forward
…who pledged to serve for only one term, as a care-taker problem-solver for this messy moment
…who knew that Washington isn’t competent to micromanage the lives of free people, but instead wanted to SERVE by focusing on 3 or 4 big national problems,
such as:
A. A national security strategy for the age of cyber and jihad;
B. Honest budgeting/entitlement reform so that we stop stealing from future generations;
C. Empowering states and local governments to improve K-12 education, and letting Washington figure out how to update federal programs to adjust to now needing lifelong learners in an age where folks are obviously not going to work at a single job for a lifetime anymore; and
D. Retiring career politicians by ending all the incumbency protections, special rules, and revolving door opportunities for folks who should be public “servants,” not masters.
This really shouldn’t be that hard.
The oath I took is to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. In brief, that means I’m for limited government.

And there is no reason to believe that either of these two national frontrunners believe in limiting anything about DC’s power.

I believe that most Americans can still be for limited government again — if they were given a winsome candidate who wanted Washington to focus on a small number of really important, urgent things — in a way that tried to bring people together instead of driving us apart.

I think there is room – an appetite – for such a candidate.

What am I missing?

More importantly, what are the people at the Fremont Wal-Mart missing?
Because I don’t think they are wrong. They deserve better. They deserve a Congress that tackles the biggest policy problems facing the nation. And they deserve a president who knows that his or her job is not to “reign,” but to serve as commander-in-chief and to “faithfully execute” the laws – not to claim imperial powers to rewrite them with his pen and phone.

The sun is mostly set on the Platte River — and the kids need baths. So g’night.

8 thoughts on “An Open Letter From Senator Ben Sasse”

  1. Stephen Kent Gray says:

    Well, there is a candidate already polling at 11% (4-16% among various demographics) for the majority of Americans aka Never Trump aka Stop Trump to support if they are seriously looking for a third party option.

    Despite this, I think Ben Sasse himself wants to be President and there is already a Draft Sasse PAC supporting him. Never Trump/Stop Trump agrees on not Donald Trump and not Hillary Clinton, but lacking a defintion of exactly who prevented any primary success of John Kasich, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, or anyone else.

    America is one of the few two party systems in the world. Australia and Malta are the others. Yes, Australia counts as one as Labor and Coalition are the major parties despite the occasional cross-benchers.

  2. Mark says:

    I lay the blame for our dysfunctional government in the lap of Congress. They can’t seem to make the hard choices necessary to run the government. The President is simply a leader and proposes policy, but it’s Congress that has to enact it. So many Republicans complain about Obama ruling by Executive order, but if Congress could do their job then the President wouldn’t have to issue these orders. The root problem that Congress has is that it’s controlled by entrenched politicians who are in debt to the corporate lobbyists who throw so much money at them.

    But, who keeps re-electing them???? Ultimately, it’s the voters who are the problem. Those who can’t see past the (R) or the (D) after a candidate’s name. Those who are blinded to the fact that there are other choices on the ballot from whom they could choose. The voters are just too lazy to make the effort and take the time to find a candidate who really speaks for them. Until the voters wake up and and make intelligent choices, we’ll keep getting what we vote for.

    The rise of Trump is a misguided attempt by voters to get rid of the usual politicians. However, they’ve been bamboozled by a charlatan. The voters are still too stupid to realize what they’re voting for. They’re not really voting FOR anything, but they’re voting AGAINST the established order.

  3. Stephen Kent Gray says:

    The election is as South Park predicted: Giant Douche versus Turd Sandwich!

  4. Dave says:

    Republicans. Democrats. Same old same old. What color should we paint the walls?

    I think Trump’s advantage has been that he is shouting “fire” as the house burns. It gets attention. There is a lot of talk these days about how the country is falling apart, but I think the anxiety people feel is that their own plans for the country are falling apart. Republicans are pretty clueless as to the bleak future of Conservatism, and they seem to think that a really fine Conservative who is a great communicator is all they need to win elections. They know that Trump has his own ideas and has little loyalty to the Party, but what they don’t know is that Conservatism as we have known it is pretty much dead. Democrats in their leftward move don’t understand that the country is not really ready for the privations of Marxism. Neither party appeals much to younger voters and they are forming up ranks; everything from the Alt-Right to the new New Left. Things are moving faster than the politicians (who are supposed to have a finger on the nation’s pulse) understand.

    Trump will win, and will be entertaining, but there are bigger moves on the way.

    1. J Clifford says:

      The house is burning?


      Where are the terrorist attacks taking place today, Dave? Last week? The week before that? Hmmm?

      Who is proposing privations of Marxism, Dave? What are those privation proposals? Name one privation proposal specifically, please.

      1. Jim Cook says:

        Bernie Sanders wants all Americans to stop using toilet paper and clean their bottoms using only solar power. I know this is true because I made it up.

      2. Dave says:

        What makes you think the reference to the burning house was about terrorist attacks, J? Hmmm?

  5. Stephen Kent Gray says:

    Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have really low favorablity rating and high unfavorable the ratings. So the two party system is giving two choices lots of Americans both find as unfavorable. This means Americans need a third option whether or not that option is Jill Stein. Americans should have to vote for someone the hate less or find less unfavorable, but rather they should have at least one option they find actually favorable and actually love voting for. Any of the eight or so third party candidates in the running for the nomination of a big third party is better than Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The nominations are due to have been complete by June 1 and August 8 or the preceding days respectively for the two biggest third parties in America.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Psst... what kind of person doesn't support pacifism?

Fight the Republican beast!