Irregular Times Diaries: Unfit DiscussionIn a time of the spring, old paths are obscured and new growth begins.
At the end of last week, 86 Democratic members of the House of Representatives joined the Republicans. They voted to support George W. Bush, and give Bush the power to continue the Iraq War with no strings attached.
Back in 2006, is that what we elected the Democrats to a majority of Congress to do? No, the Democrats were elected to Congress in order to stop the war.
The Democratic members of the House that you see below voted for war at the end of the week, just before the Memorial Day weekend, hoping that we would all just forget about their treachery. No such luck for them. Now, at the beginning of the next week, we are calling them out.
The following Democrats in Congress decided to support George W. Bush instead of representing their constituents. They do not deserve to be re-elected in 2008.
Jason Altmire of Pennsylvania
Robert Andrews Andrews of New Jersey
Joseph Baca of California
Brian Baird of Washington
John Barrow of Georgia
Melissa Bean of Illinois
Shelley Berkley of Nevada
Marion Berry of Arkansas
Timothy Bishop of Georgia
Dan Boren of Oklahoma
Leonard Boswell of Iowa
Rick Boucher of Virginia
Allen Boyd of Florida
Nancy Boyda of Kansas
G. K. Butterfield of North Carolina
Dennis Cardoza of California
Christopher Carney of Pennsylvania
Ben Chandler of Kentucky
James Clyburn of South Carolina
James Cooper of Tennessee
James Costa of Californa
Bud Cramer of Alabama
Henry Cuellar of Texas
Susan Davis of California
Lincoln Davis of Tennessee
Norman Dicks of Washington
John Dingell of Michigan
Joe Donnelly of Indiana
Chet Edwards of Texas
Brad Ellsworth of Indiana
Rahm Emanuel of Illinois
Bob Etheridge of North Carolina
Gabrielle Giffords of Illinois
Kirsten Gillibrand of New York
Charles Gonzalez of Texas
Bart Gordon of Tennessee
Gene Green of Texas
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin of South Dakota
Baron Hill of Indiana
Ruben Hinojosa of Texas
Timothy Holden of Pennsylvania
Steny Hoyer of Maryland
Steven Kagen of Wisconsin
Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania
Dale Kildee of Michigan
Ron Kind of Wisconsin
Nick Lampson of Texas
Rick Larsen of Washington
Sander Levin of Michigan
Dan Lipinski of Illinois
Tim Mahoney of Florida
James Marshall of Georgia
James Matheson of Utah
Michael McIntyre of North Carolina
Kendrick Meek of Florida
Charles Melancon of Louisiana
Harry Mitchell of Arizona
Alan Mollohan of West Virginia
Dennis Moore of Kansas
John Murtha of Pennsylvania
Solomon Ortiz of Texas
Collin Peterson of Minnesota
Earl Pomeroy of North Dakota
Nick Rahall of West Virginia
Silvestre Reyes of Texas
Ciro Rodriguez of Texas
Mike Ross of Arkansas
Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland
John Salazar of Colorado
Allyson Schwartz of Pennsylvania
David Scott of Georgia
Joseph Sestak of Pennsylvania
Heath Shuler of North Carolina
Ike Skelton of Missouri
Vic Snyder of Arkansas
Zachary Space of Ohio
John Spratt of South Carolina
Bart Stupak of Michigan
John Tanner of Tennessee
Gene Taylor of Mississippi
Bennie Thompson of Mississippi
Mark Udall of Colorado
Peter Visclosky of Illinois
Timothy Walz of Minnesota
Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida
Charles Wilson of Ohio
Pro-war Democrats, every one. Remember how they betrayed the promise of 2006. Support the Democratic primary challengers against them.




(211 votes, average: 3.1 out of 5)
Irregular Times
New Button Designs
70 queries. 0.958 seconds
May 30th, 2007 at 6:24 pm
*War, Freedom of Speech, Hollywood
unFame.com says; they are one in the same. The following, opening paragraph, or prelude, may seem odd for this topic…see it through and discover why war and Hollywood should be spoken in the same sentence (when men are dying).
Giving corp, media Hollywood a slight benefit of the doubt goes like this. 1.Perhaps corp is waiting for actors, artists to stop agreeing to contracts that they don’t fulfill. 2. In addition to this perhaps corp is hoping for same to stand up to them and say no when it’s appropriate for the sake of art regardless the potential of said actors, artists loosing all in the process. 3. Perhaps they use point one and two to toy with young artists and even destroy them because corp is unable to fully grasp art|media and/or manufacture it …see frustrated art managers with too much power and means. The obvious is this. Corp can no longer manage Hollywood affectively. It’s out of control and the proof is in the final product, lame cover up, and the absurd current US media. How embarrassing to be the manager of something as prestigious as the arts|media and turn them into something Internationally known as nothing but highly suspect and laughable.
There’s an increasing awareness in the US concerning Hollywood, celebrity gossip, actors, news and media-monopoly. The corp Hollywood machine is relentless in it’s endeavors to strangle U.S. and global arts and media with it’s supreme control. This network includes the UK. It also extends into offices of high authority. Now considered universal common knowledge, by-products of this machine includes establishing and maintaining a highly distrusted, censored and slanted arts and film, news and publication forum. Corp Hollywood owns and/or controls most all US major radio stations, T.V. networks, music labels, publishing houses, news papers and magazines, Internet and major gossip-rags. Hollywood actors|artists are suffering the brunt of this destructive machine’s collateral-damage. The general population feels it’s effects indirectly via a sweet chemical-like gassing of celeb-biz-commercialism. Society’s showing symptoms of becoming mentally and emotionally stagnated, and becoming increasingly mis-informed and/or uneducated.
Our current arts|media course is dismantling the arts, manipulating society and oppressing actors|artists. Hollywood is equivalent to royalty in the UK. It’s the figurehead for arts-media in the US. It’s highly unlikely that it’s by accident that this intelligent, corporate media monopoly machine undermines the importance of the arts-media by framing them as a silly commercial clown and defrocking it’s representatives?
This implies that Hollywood dept-heads encourages the masses to consider Hollywood’s goings-on as just an after thought for the simple minded. Common sense suggest that being passe towards this issue helps enable Hollywood’s seemingly unstoppable machine. It could be argued that responsible societies who are interested in an immediate higher state of affairs for themselves and their children closely monitor the logistics of the arts-media…and consider the front cover of gossip magazines and slanted news blurbs not as a joke, but as a blatant and insulting indicator of an attempt at mass manipulation. Case in point; why are major world news stations filling air time with trite celebrity gossip in stead of hard news (especially when the topic of war is on the plate).
It’s become beyond-ridiculously-obvious to most that the corporate monopoly machine of Hollywood, in conjunction with those in power throughout the United States with it’s silent consortium’s here and abroad, utilizes the arts-media to influence, manipulate and ultimately dominate. It could be debated that when the major corporate players from Germany first started out in the U.S. arts, in about 1920, “their eyes were big blue question marks”. Clearly, those eyes are now “big green dollar marks.” The old adage ‘control the media, control the people’ which the overly ambitious and single minded seek for unchallengeable supremacy is not worth debating. SAVE THE ARTS instead. Freedom of speech controls our society’s direction and Hollywood controls the media, or our freedom of speech|direction.
In short; in the US if you can read it, watch it, or listen to it …Hollywood owns and, or controls it. Know what the rest of the world knows …it’s only commercials and slanted news with creative-art like-stuff thrown in to sweeten it’s palatability. It also serves as a public …in your face …platform for not so disguised debates and immature squabbles amongst the handful of dept-heads who own the US media.
Awareness could lead to change. Another idea might be to take South Park’s suggestion in solving issues. Coax the corp Hollywood buggers out of their offices with reports of an unclaimed nickel on the sidewalk. Then as soon as they leave, sneak in and smear their walls, with a wide selection of your standard brown poo, all the way down to baby diarrhea green.
If one wants to stop war or any other direction our society is currently headed …stop Hollywood …get our freedom of speech back. Any other futile recourse, especially intelligent debate or discussion is like a drunken man discussing a splinter in his hand.
May 30th, 2007 at 7:10 pm
According to Jennifer Loven in The Associated Press:
May 30th, 2007 at 7:33 pm
“In short; in the US if you can read it, watch it, or listen to it …Hollywood owns and, or controls it.”
John, that’s the biggest piece of bullshit I’ve read today. Are you saying that Irregular Times is owned or controlled by Hollywood? Do you even know?
John, it looks to me that you’ve copied and pasted a piece of comment spam here that’s not even really relevant to what’s being discussed.
You do that, and then claim the high ground in a media critique?
Oh, knock it off.