Monday, 13 of February of 2012

Irregular Times Diaries: Unfit Discussion

In a time of the spring, old paths are obscured and new growth begins.

• About
• Ask for Help
• FAQ
• Posting a Diary
• Report Abusive Behavior
• Rules of the Road

Print

Why Hillary Clinton Would be a Damned Fine President For Everybody

You shouldn’t vote for Hillary Clinton because her husband Bill Clinton abused his power when in office? What an outdated, outmoded and frankly sexist way of looking at things, as if a woman inherits the sins of her husband. As if! What’s next? The return of the “rule of thumb” whereby a woman can be beaten by a small stick, just don’t make it too big? Hillary Clinton should be judged on her merits, not the demerits of Slick Willie. And Hillary Clinton has the greatest command of detail of any of the presidential candidates including John McCain. Hillary Clinton is prudent in her pursuit of policy options, not wild crazy and out of hand. Hillary Clinton doesn’t have to be a good or bad president for women. Hillary Clinton has to be a damned good president for EVERYBODY. I am confident that with her diligence and her attention to detail, she will be. Hillary Clinton will never give up on you. Don’t you give up on her.

---

Date: February 5, 2008

Author:

Categories: democrats, election 2008

Tags:

(400 votes, average: 2.95 out of 5)

 Loading ...

Leave a comment

Comments RSS TrackBack 7 comments

• 

  Frank Liberal

  in February 5th, 2008 @ 11:47

  So, then, Hillary Clinton wouldn’t be a damned fine President for sexists, would she?

  Seriously, though, Hillary Clinton certainly did give up on diplomacy and on moderation, and on listening to her constituents – most of whom did not want war – back in 2002, when she voted for the resolution giving George W. Bush the power to go to war. She gave up on us then. Why wouldn’t she do it again?

  ---

• 

  gin

  in February 5th, 2008 @ 15:15

  All this “surge” talk about Obama is being set up by Karl Rove. He wrote an op-ed piece to Barack about how to win, only because he can’t beat McCain. Hillary can, with great difficulty. Karl Rove is afraid of Hillary and does not want her in office, and that’s why he left the White House. Not to right his memoirs, but to pull the puppet strings to get Obama to win. Any woman in the Presidency would be better than any of the men. You’ve been in charge — and look what you’ve done. It’s time to spank you all and get you back in order.

  ---

• 

  nasty, gin

  in February 5th, 2008 @ 15:33

  That’s a really sexist comment, gin, and not at all appreciated. Your condenscending attitude is no better than the one you seek to replace.

  ---

• 

  sophia

  in February 6th, 2008 @ 02:52

  Oh Frank, you’re always making those blanket statements and then not backing them up. You know quite well the voters are fickle and at that moment in time would have tarred and feathered any politician who dared not get on the flag-waving bandwagon. Did you not see the flags where you live? I have news for you. Those were not anti-war flags.

  As for Hillary’s notorious husband, he’s not going to be a problem, see? He’s just not. He learned his lesson in Arkansas when he had to drop out of the race over his indiscretions. Then he learned his lesson again in the White House. Then he had a personality change when they did the heart surgery. Anyhow not to worry. You know how Hillary hasn’t exactly come out against renewing the FISA bill entirely? That’s because once she’s president, she’s gonna use it to wiretap the First Dude and put him under surveillance as a national security risk. They’ll have one of those web cams like Kelcey Wilson has and they’re gonna have this Open Government Sunshine policy and anyone will be able to tune in any time and see what he’s doing with his interns. They’re going to link it with Yellowstone’s Old Faithful webcam.

  ---

• 

  Frank Liberal

  in February 6th, 2008 @ 08:32

  So, Hillary Clinton went with the tar-and-feather mob. Oh THAT’S a great reason to elect her as President.

  ---

• 

  Frank Liberal

  in February 6th, 2008 @ 08:33

  Oh, and what about those senators who didn’t vote for the war?

  Guess what? They WERE NOT tarred and feathered by the voters – just by Democratic Leadership Council conservatives like Hillary Clinton.

  ---

• 

  sophia

  in February 6th, 2008 @ 16:00

  So do we get names and specifics or just more blanket assertions that don’t sound quite right?

  ---

Irregular Times Diaries: Unfit Discussion uses WordPress as content manager.