<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Irregular Times Diaries: Unfit Discussion &#187; environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/diarytag/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries</link>
	<description>In a time of the spring, old paths are obscured and new growth begins.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Must We Accept Risky Offshore Drilling?</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2010/06/why-must-we-accept-risky-offshore-drilling/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2010/06/why-must-we-accept-risky-offshore-drilling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Losers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brian baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gulf of mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/?p=1612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does Brian Baird say that we <u>must</u> we accept that offshore drilling for oil in the riskiest deepwater environments is going to take place?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a hearing of the House Science and Technology Subcommittee on Energy and Environment yesterday, Chairman <a href="http://thatsmycongress.com/house/repBairdWA3111.html">Brian Baird</a> declared that, <i>&#8220;Whether the moratorium on drilling activities in the Gulf is lifted in 30 days or 30 years, we must accept that the hydrocarbon reserves in these fields will be produced someday.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Why?  Why <u>must</u> we accept that offshore drilling for oil in the riskiest deepwater environments is going to take place?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t we have the freedom to choose another course?  Is our government that much in the thrall of the oil industry that our leaders will accept no possibility of an end to deepwater offshore drilling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2010/06/why-must-we-accept-risky-offshore-drilling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Sense of Impoverished Housing</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/05/green-poor-houses/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/05/green-poor-houses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 19:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/05/green-poor-houses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it's a good thing, that homebuilding is down.  There will be less of a bad thing, until green building can increase.  Over the next four years, green homebuilding companies are expected to almost double their market share.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a great deal of concern about the foreclosures of American homes, and plummeting home values, but there&#8217;s a different kind of real estate crisis: A foreclosure of green values.</p>
<p><a href="http://solveclimate.com/blog/20080515/zero-americas-biggest-home-builders-are-going-green">Solve Climate reports</a> that out of the top dozen homebuilding corporations in the United States, not one has integrated environmentally-sustainable design into their work.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a good thing, then, that homebuilding is down.  There will be less of a bad thing, until green building can increase.  Over the next four years, green homebuilding companies are expected to almost double their market share.</p>
<p>For someone a lucky, the wait won&#8217;t be that long. HGTV has held a Green Home Sweepstakes, and will <a href="http://www.hgtv.com/hgtv/green_home/">announce the winner of an eco-friendly new home</a> in a few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/05/green-poor-houses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative Apparel Not Very Alternative, Really</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/05/alternative-apparel-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/05/alternative-apparel-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreigners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative apparel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cafepress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clothes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stitching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweatshops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/05/alternative-apparel-movie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.americanapparel.net">American Apparel</a> and <a href="http://skreened.com/irregularwear">Skreened</a> are the real thing.  They follow American labor and environmental laws.  Alternative Apparel doesn't.  They went for the ethical loophole.  They're just posers. Do you want to wear clothes made by posers?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, CafePress sent us a cap as a free sample, to get us excited about selling clothes using a technology they call InfiniStitch.  It&#8217;s a way to get an image made on a computer automatically stitched as a badge on a piece of clothing.</p>
<p>That sounds really great, but there&#8217;s a problem, as seen on the sample cap filmed in the movie below: The stitching doesn&#8217;t actually look very good, and the words in the stitching are almost impossible to read.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="373"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bkphUv2jAVM&#038;hl=en&#038;color1=0x5d1719&#038;color2=0xcd311b&#038;border=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bkphUv2jAVM&#038;hl=en&#038;color1=0x5d1719&#038;color2=0xcd311b&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"></embed></object></p>
<p>That&#8217;s small stuff compared to the problem I found on the tag: The cap is made in China by a company called <A href="http://www.squidoo.com/alternativeapparel">Alternative Apparel</a>.  The name <i>Alternative Apparel</i> sounds great, but there&#8217;s more to a business than just a name.</p>
<p>Alternative Apparel makes a lot of promises when it comes to the ethical treatment of workers in its Chinese factories, and it says that it inspects factories a few times a year in order to see if things are on the up-and-up.  However, Alternative Apparel doesn&#8217;t really know what&#8217;s going on in those factories in China except on those special inspection days.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on in Chinese factories has been exposed: Forced prisoner labor, worker abuse, and even <a href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/06/why-you-cant-trust-made-in-china-hidden-slave-labor/">child slave labor</a>.  The New York Times recently reported that <i>&#8220;Big corporations have stepped up inspections of factories that produce goods for them. But suppliers have become adept at evading such scrutiny by providing fake wage and work schedule data that suggest they abide by labor laws.&#8221;</i>  They report the use of Chinese child slave labor as &#8220;quite typical&#8221;.</p>
<p>Alternative Apparel surely knows about these problems, and the insufficiency of inspections in revealing the problem.  Yet, they choose to do business in China anyway.</p>
<p>Why?  That&#8217;s easy.  They do it for the money.  </p>
<p>Alternative Apparel chose to have the clothes it sells made in China in order to save money, so that they could make big profits.  They knew that China has low labor costs because it has low standards of worker protection.</p>
<p>Alternative Apparel chose to outsource its manufacturing to China in order to avoid American laws that guarantee fair treatment of workers and environmental protections.</p>
<p>Do you want to support that choice?  It&#8217;s your freedom to do so, but if you buy from companies like Alternative Apparel, please don&#8217;t act shocked when you hear about children being forced to work as slaves in China.  You helped make it happen, after all, with every cheap thing you bought that was made in China.</p>
<p>There is a true alternative in apparel.  You can buy a shirt from <a href="http://skreened.com/irregularwear">Skreened</a>, which prints here in the USA, only on shirts that are made in America, by <a href="http://www.americanapparel.net">American Apparel</a>.</p>
<p>American Apparel is the real thing.  They follow American labor and environmental laws.  Alternative Apparel doesn&#8217;t.  They went for the ethical loophole.  They&#8217;re just posers.</p>
<p>Do you want to wear clothes made by posers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/05/alternative-apparel-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Cooling Trends Solar Hypothesis Proves Global Warming Wrong</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/04/current-cooling-right-now/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/04/current-cooling-right-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peregrin Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar hypothesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/04/current-cooling-right-now/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just look around you and think.  While you slept last night, dreaming the Green dreams that the Earth Firsters put into your head, the USA was getting colder, not warmer!  Well, how could it be getting cooler if there is global warming?  You know the answer.  It can't!  Global warming is a hoax.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so sick and tired of hearing people say that the sky is falling, and talk about global warming as if it is actually taking place.  Why do they keep suppressing the truth?  Why won&#8217;t they let the public hear about the <b>real</b> scientific measurements that are taking place?</p>
<p>There is an alternative hypothesis that the liberal media never talks about: The Solar Hypothesis.  The Solar Hypothesis acknowledges that there was a period of warming, but observes that temperatures in many places on Earth are now actually cooling!  It&#8217;s true!  It&#8217;s happening right now, and if you don&#8217;t believe me, then I challenge you to start observing temperatures yourself instead of just accepting what <A href="http://www.cafepress.com/votedem2008/682129">Al Gore</a> is telling you.</p>
<p>The Solar Hypothesis holds that there are cycles of warming and cooling of the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere, but that these cycles of warming and cooling happen because of differences in the intensity of energy from the Sun as it hits the Earth, not because of human pollution.</p>
<p>The truth that Al Gore doesn&#8217;t want you to know is that temperatures all across the United States have been getting cooler for a long time now &#8211; for months, since late August last year.</p>
<p>Will there be a warming trend after this cooling trend is done?  Sure.  That&#8217;s only natural.  In fact, scientists who adhere to the Solar Hypothesis predict that there will be a short warming trend starting sometime soon and extending to the end of July, all across the Northern Hemisphere.</p>
<p>But, right now, there is a cooling trend, not global warming!  This cooling trend is part of a cycle, which real scientists understand.  It gets warmer, and colder, and warmer again.  Nothing to worry about.</p>
<p>This morning, for example, there was a region-wide warming trend, and maybe that&#8217;s what the global warming econuts are all worried about.  But, there is a current cooling trend.  The Solar Hypothesis predicts this, noting that the effect of the sun is getting weaker right now, and is weakening all the time.  At 6:05, as I write this, the temperature is about 45 degrees, but by the end of the night, it could well be below freezing!</p>
<p>Take that, Al Gore.  How is that global warming?  The temperature is getting colder, you envirofascist!</p>
<p>Never mind what the scientific establishment says about this study and that study.  You know, you can get research to say anything you want to.  You can trust me because I&#8217;m asking you to think logically, and I trust your intelligence, unlike those pointy headed university welfare cases.</p>
<p>Just look around you and think.  While you slept last night, dreaming the Green dreams that the Earth Firsters put into your head, the USA was getting colder, not warmer!  Well, how could it be getting cooler if there is global warming?  </p>
<p>You know the answer.  It can&#8217;t!  Global warming is a hoax.</p>
<p>For the benefit of readers who don&#8217;t know me: <font size=+5>Wink!</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/04/current-cooling-right-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your Mayor Cool?</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/02/cool-mayors/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/02/cool-mayors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/02/cool-mayors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A mayor is counted as cool if he or she has committed the municipal government of his or her city or village to reducing greenhouse gas emissions through the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCP) or the US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement.  In other words, these mayors are trying to get around the inaction of the Bush White House in confronting climate change, and working to make things better where they live.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Gardner of Oberlin, Ohio is cool.  George Luna of Atascadero, California is cool.  John Bork of Grafton, Iowa is cool.</p>
<p>Is your mayor cool?  You can check at <a href="http://www.coolmayors.com">Cool Mayors</a>.</p>
<p>A mayor is counted as cool if he or she has committed the municipal government of his or her city or village to reducing greenhouse gas emissions through the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCP) or the US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement.  In other words, these mayors are trying to get around the inaction of the Bush White House in confronting climate change, and working to make things better where they live.</p>
<p>Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/02/cool-mayors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Polluted Math of Big Oil Profits</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/02/big-oil-slick-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/02/big-oil-slick-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Gall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/02/big-oil-slick-economy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican politics in Washington D.C. brings us this polluted equation: 40 billion dollars of profits for ExxonMobil in 2008 plus record oil prices plus ever escalating economic damage due to fossil-fuel-fueled climate change equals continued tax breaks for ExxonMobil This is no joke. It&#8217;s what&#8217;s really going on. We&#8217;re getting another record-breaking federal budget next [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican politics in Washington D.C. brings us this polluted equation:</p>
<p><i>40 billion dollars of profits for ExxonMobil in 2008 <b>plus</b> record oil prices <b>plus</b> ever escalating economic damage due to fossil-fuel-fueled climate change <b>equals</b> continued tax breaks for ExxonMobil</i></p>
<p>This is no joke.  It&#8217;s what&#8217;s really going on.  We&#8217;re getting another record-breaking federal budget next year, but ExxonMobil won&#8217;t be paying its share.  </p>
<p>The Republicans in DC are nothing but an oil slick across America&#8217;s pocketbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2008/02/big-oil-slick-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
