<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Irregular Times Diaries: Unfit Discussion &#187; epa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/diarytag/epa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries</link>
	<description>In a time of the spring, old paths are obscured and new growth begins.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Report on Rising Sea Levels Available</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2009/01/sea-levels-report/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2009/01/sea-levels-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shores]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2009/01/sea-levels-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The report concludes that attempting to preserve current shorelines will have a lower social and environmental cost in the short run, but will have a higher cost in the long term.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the consequences of global warming is rising sea levels.  There is no rational debate about whether sea levels are rising &#8211; this change has been measured worldwide.</p>
<p>At the end of last week, the EPA issued a new <a href="http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/effects/coastal/sap4-1.html">report on the likely implications of sea level rise</a>.  The report goes into a good amount of detail, making it a useful resource if you&#8217;re truly interested in the subject, but not a thrilling read if you&#8217;re only casually tracking the issue.</p>
<p>The report confirms that <i>&#8220;Rising water levels are already an important factor in submerging low-lying lands, eroding beaches, converting wetlands to open water, and exacerbating coastal flooding.&#8221;</i>  In comparing the social and environmental costs of trying to preserve current shorelines and managing a retreat to higher ground, the report concludes that attempting to preserve current shorelines will have a lower social and environmental cost in the short run, but will have a higher cost in the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/diaries/2009/01/sea-levels-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
