![]() | Fleeing to Canada? Try Cleveland Instead. |
Mother Davis gets out the map and suggests,
It’s time for liberals to make their move. I mean that literally. In the real world, every day is Election Day, and the choices that we make either make the liberal position stronger or lend support to the Republican nationalist cause.
Here at Irregular Times, we have begun describing the political position of the Republican Party not just as conservative, but as nationalist. First of all, the Republican elites who now govern this country have betrayed many of the conservative ideals that they claim to hold. Worse than that, the Republican Party has officially endorsed a neo-Fascist platform.
I’m not kidding when I call the Republican platform neo-fascist. Think about the way that it officially values security over freedom. In Texas, the Republican Party has officially declared the USA to be a nation of and for Christianity. The renaming of America as The Homeland has sent a chill down the backs of many older Americans who remembered many similar phrases coming out of Nazi Germany and the Fascists in Italy and Spain. The unquestioning militarism in our popular culture and unapologetically expansionist foreign policy, combined with the Republicans dehumanization of our enemies with epithets such as “towel heads” and “sand niggers” comes straight from the top of the nationalists’ leadership. Our flag has become an idol to worship much in the same way that the Nazis reverred the swastika, and our government is scapegoating vulnerable cultural minorities the same way that Hitler made political use of the Jews. The list of Fascist characteristics of the new Republican elite goes on and on.
We’re not alone in detecting the whiff of a new and dangerous American nationalism in the air. Many American liberals have intuitively felt the gathering threat, and in reaction to the narrow re-election of George W. Bush and his promise to strictly enforce his supposed mandate, a record number of Americans have begun the process of emigrating to Canada.
Pause and think about that for a second. Under George W. Bush, the United States, which in the past has been so respected around the world that immigrants flooded our shores, is now experiencing a boom in the number of its own citizens who are desperate to escape its borders. This is another similarity to the growth of Fascism in Europe. Artists, intellectuals and freethinking citizens are starting to flee.
The numbers prove that this flight is, in fact, taking place. The day after the election of George W. Bush, requests from Americans about how to obtain Canadian citizenship skyrocketed 575 percent. Even after that first shocking and tragic day, tens of thousands of Americans are starting the process of leaving for Canada - every day.
I understand why these good Americans are calling it quits. The new nationalist America is not something that we’re proud of. My own sister-in-law is among those who are in the process of fleeing to Canada, and I know many others who are making the move.
However, I want to suggest three alternatives to emigration to Canada. Keep in mind that Canada is by no means a perfect nation. I also still believe that America is worth saving - if only because we are the most powerful nation on Earth, and if the Republican nationalist agenda is allowed to suceed, the entire world will suffer the consequences.
Alternative 1: If you live in a red state, leave it for a blue state. By living in a red state, you not only contribute to the economy of the nationalist culture, but you also are helping to give that red state power in the Electoral College. The number of a votes a state gets in the Electoral College is calculated according to the number of people living in that state. If you voted for John Kerry, but you live in a red state, your vote in the Electoral College is now for George W. Bush, whether you like it or not. If you had lived in a blue state, you could have lent your Electoral College weight to the more progressive candidate, and taken it away from George W. Bush. The next time that the Electoral College votes will be recalculated in 2010, so moving will not affect the next presidential election, but it will affect the elections of 2012. Moving out of that red state will also reduce the number of nationalist politicians the Republicans there are allowed to send to the House of Representatives.
Alternative 2: If you’re a liberal currently living in a red state, move to Ohio. The Republicans like to claim a landslide, but the fact is that they won Ohio by just 132,000 votes. If the liberals who live in Kentucky alone would just pick up and move across the state border to Ohio, Ohio would become a solid blue state, and would never vote for a neo-Fascist candidate like George W. Bush again. This suggestion goes for Florida too, which also had a fairly close vote. If you’re a liberal living in Georgia, Alabama or Mississippi, you know you’re not welcome there, so move to Florida, enjoy the beaches, and vote!
Alternative 3: If you don’t already live in one, move to a blue town. Where you shop and pay taxes determines a lot about who has the power in America. If you live in an area that has a majority of Republicans, even if you live in a blue state, you are inevitably giving most of your money to pro-nationalist businesses and local governments. Take your money and leave for more friendly territory, and the Republicans will suffer for it. Their businesses won’t make as much profit, and their property values will go down. In the progressive town that you move to, on the other hand, local businesses run by good liberals will benefit, and the real estate wealth of the area will increase as well.
How can you find a liberal oasis? Go over to Google, and find an index of liveable cities. These towns are likely to have liberal values, because we liberals support our communities, and are much less likely to create generic suburbs, cut up our towns with interstate highways, and racially segregate our communities. We also support our schools more than nationalist Republicans do, so you’ll be in the company of well-educated youngsters, which is always a pleasure. I’ll also help you out by suggesting a few good blue state liberal havens that I know of:
Yes, Washington D.C. - something like 70 percent of the people who live in our nation’s capital voted to remove George W. Bush from office, and they ought to know.
If you just can’t bear to leave the red state that you’re living in, I’ll throw you a bone and suggest the following refuges of liberalism in the nationalist red states:
Just before the election, one of our writers suggested that the blue states secede from the Union and become independent nations. Since that time, we’ve received many emails from viewers supporting the idea. Think about moving within the United States as a kind of economic and social secession, a first step that will make you safer from the growing nationalist threat and withdraw your support from it.
Proudly filling up her carpet bag and beginning her journey to Ithaca,
Mother Davis
It is a time of fear in the face of freedom, a time for the widening of previous roads and the opening of new paths, a time of an emptying country and swelling cities, yet a time when these paths are mined by knowing algorithms of the all-seeing eye. It is the time of the warrior's peace and the miser's charity, when the planting of a seed is an act of conscientious objection.




Contact Us





You left St. Louis off your list. St. Louis City and St. Louis County went Democratic.
Here’s an idea to redistribute the votes of the electorial college. If a state has more than 12 electorial college votes, the state has to be split up. Texas becomes North Texas, South Texas and West Texas. California becomes North California, Central California, California and South California. And so on. This would not affect the House of representatives but would increase the Senate and hopefully balance the electorial college a little.
A reverse option would be to combine small states. All of New England could be combined into two normal sized states but that wouldn’t help the Democrats much.
I’ve talked to friends in the St. Louis area that voted for Cheney and his little dummy. Most of them are Roman Catholic and are voting on one issue - abortion. One of them told me that once they get that problem fixed, they will switch back to the Democratic party. I.E. they actully BELIEVE that the dummy is going to cater to them and outlaw abortion. What hold would he or the Repulicans have over them then? None!
By the way, drifting further off the topic, in New Scientist Magazine there was an article recently that said that life actually begins (starts developing) three months before the egg is released. And conception (the winning of the sperm race) is only 5% of the overall process. My conclusion, lock up all women of child bearing age, because you can’t be to careful! Isn’t this obvious! Keep them in the basement from puberty to menopause! FLAG! FLAG! FLAG! FLAG!!!
Comment by Mike Svoboda — 11/7/2004 @ 2:41 pm
When I moved to Albuquerque New Mexico in 1993, it was solidly Democratic. With a large base of Hispanics and a poor economy, we we solidly Blue. Now, with a lot of hispanics intimidated out of voting, and a large number of republicans moving here to retire, we have lost two elections to the “reds” here in New Mexico. I would consider moving to help out the cause, but I think New Mexico can be saved if only Democrats spent a little more time here explaining to the poor farmers and hispanics how the policies of the republicans hurt them, not help them. And how the Democrats policies support poor people and equality. Also, Catholicism is strong here (something like 75% of the population) and I think alot of Catholics voted Bush because of that Bishop that would not give Kerry Comunion and said that to vote for a democrat is the same as voting for abortion. Democrats need to make it clear to New Mexicans that there is strong bible support for choice and for not judging others, but forgiving and helping them. Am I for abortion? No. But I support a persons’ right to use their God given free will to make their own choices. All in all, I think that most republicans are unimformed voters. We need to do a better job getting the message out of the values that Democrats stand for, and why voting for republicans is less desirable than voting for Democrats.
Comment by Sick of Republicans — 11/8/2004 @ 11:28 am
I apologize for posting with three spelling errors. First, chage “we we solidly Blue” to “we were solidly Blue.” Second, change “give Kerry Comunion” to “give Kerry Communion.” Finally, change “strong bible support” to “strong biblical support.”
Comment by Sick of Republicans — 11/8/2004 @ 11:36 am
Hispanics intimidated out of voting? Intimidated, as in not registered and/or not having proper ID and being denied access to voting booths, or actual physical intimidation? If it is the former, then I feel anyone who can’t follow simple rules such as registering to vote and/or bringing proper ID probably doesn’t deserve to vote, regardless of what hyphen-American you are.
If the latter, wake up! Your alarm clock is going off. It’s time for another day of complaining!
Where in a metropolitan area such as Albuquerque will you find people standing in front of a voting booth intimidating potential voters? That doesn’t happen. And the reason I know is because, well, it hasn’t made ANY major news paper or tv program. It may exist in Buttf**k Town, USA, but not in a major metro area. Sorry. Just doesn’t happen, especially with the horde of security and media at every voting booth within 100 miles.
Comment by Kevin — 11/10/2004 @ 10:57 am
Kevin, the voice of God, speaketh.
Comment by Anonymous — 11/10/2004 @ 11:45 am
Actually, Kevin the granite head, speaketh. Kevin, I’m sure that in your mind your never wrong. Unfortunatly your mind is buried deep inside your thick skull which is further buried up your fat ass, never to see the light of day let alone the light of reason. Your nuerons are hard wired in permanent place never to change, never to wander from their fixed narrow single minded path.
Comment by Mike — 11/11/2004 @ 3:27 am
The fact that St. Louis voted Democratic hardly makes it a liberal city. There’s something missing from St. Louis - a popular liberal civic ethic of community
Comment by Halso — 3/25/2005 @ 5:55 am