Comments on: The Fundamentalist Congress: Don’t Like Court Rulings? Ignore Them in the Name of Jesus! http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/06/19/the-fundamentalist-congress-dont-like-court-rulings-ignore-them-in-the-name-of-jesus/ When old landmarks crumble, established roads no longer lead the way. New paths open to those with an irregular eye. Our news is unfit for print. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:40:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Tom http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/06/19/the-fundamentalist-congress-dont-like-court-rulings-ignore-them-in-the-name-of-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-22192 Tom Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:30:54 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=658#comment-22192 And the Lord chased the moneylenders out of the synagogue. This must mean we don't have to pay taxes Thelma! Hot damn, i knew them Republicrats was the right way ta vote! And the Lord chased the moneylenders out of the synagogue. This must mean we don’t have to pay taxes Thelma! Hot damn, i knew them Republicrats was the right way ta vote!

]]> By: Sarge http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/06/19/the-fundamentalist-congress-dont-like-court-rulings-ignore-them-in-the-name-of-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-21920 Sarge Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:29:56 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=658#comment-21920 Sorry, Zero, you've got to be a BIG crook to do all that, or at least rich as hell. Remember, the law in its majesty forbids everyone, no matter how rich or poor from sleeping under bridges or stealing bread. For the rich, the rest is up for grabs. Sorry, Zero, you’ve got to be a BIG crook to do all that, or at least rich as hell. Remember, the law in its majesty forbids everyone, no matter how rich or poor from sleeping under bridges or stealing bread. For the rich, the rest is up for grabs.

]]> By: Zero Haven http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/06/19/the-fundamentalist-congress-dont-like-court-rulings-ignore-them-in-the-name-of-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-21643 Zero Haven Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:55:08 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=658#comment-21643 Am I reading that the US Government is refusing to back decisions made by their courts? So government employees such as jail guards won't act to contain felons convicted by a court. Police will no longer pursue folks who ignore judgements to pay alimony and child support. Sweeeet! God told me to go looting. Let's go! Am I reading that the US Government is refusing to back decisions made by their courts?

So government employees such as jail guards won’t act to contain felons convicted by a court. Police will no longer pursue folks who ignore judgements to pay alimony and child support.

Sweeeet!

God told me to go looting. Let’s go!

]]> By: John Stracke http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/06/19/the-fundamentalist-congress-dont-like-court-rulings-ignore-them-in-the-name-of-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-21444 John Stracke Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:10:14 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=658#comment-21444 <blockquote>Rep. Hostettler’s unique theory of government is</blockquote>...not unique, or even original. It's the same as the theory President Jackson had when he (supposedly) said, "John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it."

Rep. Hostettler’s unique theory of government is

…not unique, or even original. It’s the same as the theory President Jackson had when he (supposedly) said, “John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it.”

]]>