Republican Transportation Bill Moves Your Money to Pork

Republicans talk small government, but when it comes to their actions, the Republicans’ small talk turns into big government waste.

Consider this year’s transportation bill, written and passed into law by the Republicans. The Republican bill contains a record number of unnecessary pork barrel projects, far more than were ever put into legislation by any Democratic Congress. In 1991, the Democratic Congress passed funding for 538 pork barrel special transportation infrastructure projects. That sounds like a lot, but this year, even the conservative Cato Institute agrees that the Republican Congress passed funding for 6,371 pork barrel special transportation projects. That’s twelve times as many as the Democrats asked for. Has America’s transportation infrastructure become twelve times as expensive over the last fourteen years? No, it’s just that since the Republicans grabbed control of congress, the corrupt practice of wasteful transportation spending has expanded by 1,200 percent.

What kind of wasteful special projects has the Republican Congress forced on the American taxpayer? Well, there’s a bridge in Alaska that the Republicans want to sell to you that serves as a great example. Alaska Republican senator Ted Stevens inserted millions of dollars in federal government funding for a new bridge in Alaska that will equal the size of the Golden Gate Bridge. Where does this huge new bridge go to? It goes from the small city of Ketchikan to the little island of Gravina. Gravina is inhabited by 50 people.

Of course, it would be unfair to say that Republican senator Ted Stevens got the American taxpayer to fork out millions of dollars just so that 50 Alaskans on Gravina island could drive on a bridge instead of taking a ferry. No, there are other uses for the bridge. That huge bridge, paid for by public money, will enable big trucks owned by logging companies and mining companies to haul timber and ore from Gravina Island to the mainland. The companies that profit from this deal were big donors to the Ted Stevens re-election campaign.

That kind of corruption is not what the Republicans promised when they took over Congress in 1994. They promised to conduct the business of the Congress with honesty and integrity. Writing huge checks of taxpayer money to pay for big government programs that benefit only corporate campaign donors may be what the Republicans regard as honesty and integrity, but where I come from, people have different ideas. If the Republicans won’t run the Congress in a clean way, then it’s time for American voters to clean out the Congress of the corrupt Republican influence. We get that chance in less than 18 months, with nationwide congressional elections. Let’s hope that the American public is paying attention.

About jclifford

A senior writer for Irregular Times. Formerly an antiaquarian speech pathologist.
This entry was posted in Economy, Legislation, Republicans, State and Local and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Republican Transportation Bill Moves Your Money to Pork

  1. IceyMaster says:

    Jimmy:
    I agree with you on the pork on this, but aren’t you stretching it just a bit when you say the bill was “passed into law by Republicans”?

    The vote in the House was 418 to 8, and the Senate: 91 to 4, or so I read.

    Sounds like it was passed into law by both parties, even though it was written by a Republican.

    And when the 3 states that got the largest share of the money, NY, CA, and Illinois are all “blue” states, I smell more than a one-party “rat” here.

    It’s time we stop politicizing every act and making retoric the king. It looks like they all wanted a grab of this money, from both sides. If they didn’t, why didn’t every non-Republican vote for their conscience and with honesty and integrity? Why? For their re-election to be helped by bragging how much money they “got” for their home state, that’s why.

    This is clearly an issue and a particular example where both sides are almost equally to blame.
    Jeff Flake, a Republican, called the bill, “no way to spend money”, and Max Baucus, a Democrat, tried to use the bill to reopen part of a closed Air Force base.

    If the vote was more like 55/45, then the rest of your points would be valid. Clearly here you’re letting your views cloud the issue that they all are pretty much interested in grabbing the same money, regardless of party. It’s not the best example to use to bash Republicans. Stick to the ones that can easily be shown to support one-party-only responsibility.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Jimmy? Who’s Jimmy?

    Of course everybody voted for the bill. Who mastered its writing? The Republicans. That’s the story.

  3. IceyMaster says:

    That’s poor understanding.

  4. Han says:

    To IceyMaster:

    I believe the voting was done for the ENTIRE Transportation Bill as a whole, and not for every individual projects in every state – obviously that would be way too many indivdiual bills.

    As such, this bill can only be passed as a ALL-OR-NOTHING. So what choice does a Senator or a Congressman have – debate over every questionable project? How can a bill possibly get passed then?

    And your comments about CA, NY, and IL getting the largest share; well maybe it has something to do with the fact that those three states rank #1, #3, and #5 in population, and Alaska #48 (while having the largest acreage, making it by far the least densely populated state). Not to mention that CA has the nation’s largest economy, and I suspect NY is not that far behind.

    Regards.

    HTP

  5. Pingback: Irregular Times: News » Sarah Palin Flip Flop On Bridge To Nowhere

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>