http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/11/25/an-alternative-to-virgil-goode-al-weeds-campaign-gets-kicked-in-gear/ When old landmarks crumble, established roads no longer lead the way. New paths open to those with an irregular eye. Our news is unfit for print. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:48:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/11/25/an-alternative-to-virgil-goode-al-weeds-campaign-gets-kicked-in-gear/comment-page-1/#comment-176920 michael Sun, 06 Aug 2006 16:33:47 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/11/25/an-alternative-to-virgil-goode-al-weeds-campaign-gets-kicked-in-gear/#comment-176920 Actually Goode secured $15M in contracts for MZM. And the donations were not only coordinated, but reimbursed by MZM's chief executive, Mitchell Wade. And the contract was cut off under investigation by the federal government, meaning all the money Martinsville and the State spent developing the facility were wasted. Goode wrote the contract so that MZM bore none of the liability. Actually Goode secured $15M in contracts for MZM. And the donations were not only coordinated, but reimbursed by MZM’s chief executive, Mitchell Wade. And the contract was cut off under investigation by the federal government, meaning all the money Martinsville and the State spent developing the facility were wasted. Goode wrote the contract so that MZM bore none of the liability.

]]> http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/11/25/an-alternative-to-virgil-goode-al-weeds-campaign-gets-kicked-in-gear/comment-page-1/#comment-53992 Tom Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:24:03 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2005/11/25/an-alternative-to-virgil-goode-al-weeds-campaign-gets-kicked-in-gear/#comment-53992 Sounds like business as usual. . .lie your face off and then claim to have been misinterpreted, have changed views, or otherwise engage in the ol' pay to play routine with big corporate interests. Yup, nothing new there. It's just fascinating that very few of our "elected representatives" actually vote in our best interests - no matter the party affiliation. Sounds like business as usual. . .lie your face off and then claim to have been misinterpreted, have changed views, or otherwise engage in the ol’ pay to play routine with big corporate interests. Yup, nothing new there. It’s just fascinating that very few of our “elected representatives” actually vote in our best interests – no matter the party affiliation.

]]>