irregular times arrow pathsIt is a time of fear in the face of freedom, a time for the widening of previous roads and the opening of new paths, a time of an emptying country and swelling cities, yet a time when these paths are mined by knowing algorithms of the all-seeing eye. It is the time of the warrior's peace and the miser's charity, when the planting of a seed is an act of conscientious objection.

These are the times when maps fade and direction is lost. Forwards is backwards now, so we glance sideways at the strange lands through which we are all passing, knowing for certain only that our destination has disappeared. We are unready to meet these times, but we proceed nonetheless, adapting as we wander, reshaping the Earth with every tread. Behind us we have left the old times, the standard times, the high times. Welcome to the irregular times.


Current Conversation


Tom Tancredo Coddles Criminals  
9 comments by Geo, Junga, , Mat [...]

Hillary Clinton Passed Over, Um, With Prime Convention Spot!  
1 comments by Jim

Independent Atheists Unite For Mutual Defense  
9 comments by EvilPoet, EvilPoet, Jim, EvilPoet [...]

60 Children Alleged Killed By American Military in Afghanistan  
1 comments by Jim

Democratic Party To Officially Oppose Nonreligious Americans  
9 comments by J. Clifford, Tom, EvilPoet, Jim [...]

Reach Out and Touch Somebody's Keyboard  
2 comments by Tom, J. Clifford

Most Recent Diaries

Will They Call Him Joseph Robinette Biden? by Flippant

Saving the Dove by Curious Sam

Evan Bayh Lacks Diplomatic Skill Of A Good VP by jclifford

Aspiring Ayatollah Paul Broun Proclaims God Sovereign by Barley

The Hellcat of Frenchtown Road by Mystery Man

Veering Off the Blog

Our longer form writing and extended series:

2008 Reasons to Elect a Progressive President

Challenges to Empiricism and Reason

Department of Credulity Studies

Department of Homeland Insecurity

False Witness

Funny Money

Further Than Atheism

Irregular Bin

Irregular Growth

Irregular States

Magniloquence Against War

Splintered Speech

Unity08 Watch

U.S. House Rankings

U.S. Senate Rankings

Wandering Aimlessly


Story Categories


Story Archives


Prior to October 27, 2004

Story Feeds

"The secret of ugliness consists not in irregularity, but in being uninteresting." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

many paths in Irregular Times

Irregular Times: News Unfit for Print

Our Latest Stories:

The Melissa Etheridge Case Against Genetic Engineering

Clinton Says There is No Ceiling Except For the Godless

Convention Helps "People of God" And Screws The Rest Of Us

GOP Appoints Blackwell as Platform Vice Chair, Confirming Moral Rot

This Time Will Be Different? Come Now, Senator Obama. I still see the Lipstick on your Collar.

60 Children Alleged Killed By American Military in Afghanistan

Hillary Clinton Passed Over, Um, With Prime Convention Spot!

Independent Atheists Unite For Mutual Defense

Brian Schweitzer, the Entertainer

WILL THE SPEAKERS AT THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION STOP YELLING?



Tuesday, May 16th, 2006

strange hourglass

Challenge Donald E. Wildmon: Name One

Filed under Religion, Sex by jclifford at 10:45 am

I got an email from the ultra-right-wing religious American Family Association yesterday that included the following claim:

“Once homosexual marriage is legal, our religious liberties will be stripped away. Even pro-homosexual marriage advocates agree with that statement.”

Well, gosh. I haven’t heard any advocates of marriage equality who have said that freedom to marry for all committed couples will strip religious liberty away from anyone. On the contrary, I’ve heard many point out that, because many religious groups believe in the sanctity of same-sex marriage, it is an attack on religious liberty to deny those religious groups to officiate marriages as they see fit.

It’s groups like the American Family Association that are trying to strip away religious liberty. Like the Massachusetts Puritans who hung Quakers for heresy, they’re determined to snuff out any dissent from their narrow interpretation of religion.

So, what do advocates for marriage equality actually say on expanding marriage freedom and religious liberty? Here’s a sample:

From Marriage Equality USA:

“Even after civil marriage becomes available to same-sex couples, churches will retain the right to decide for themselves whether to perform or recognize any marriage, just as they already do for every couple. No court decision or legislative enactment can change the basic tenets of religious faith. For example, some religions will not marry someone who has already been divorced, although the person is free to marry civilly. We respect the right of a faith to decide for itself what marriages it will embrace.”

From the Religious Coalition for the Freedom to Marry:

“We respect the fact that debate and discussion continue in many of our religious communities as to the theological and liturgical issues involved. However, we draw on our many faith traditions to arrive at a common conviction: we are resolved that the State should not interfere with same-gender couples who choose to marry and share fully and equally in the rights, responsibilities, and commitments of civil marriage. We affirm the right to freedom of conscience in this matter: we recognize that the state may not require religious groups to officiate at, or bless, same-gender marriages. By the same token, a denial of civil recognition dishonors the religious convictions of those communities and clergy who do officiate at, and bless, same-gender marriages; the state may not favor the convictions of one religious group over another to deny individuals their fundamental right to marry and have those marriages recognized by civil law.”

From the Human Rights Campaign:

“Granting marriage rights to same-sex couples would not require Christian, Jewish, Muslim or any other religions to perform these marriages. It would not require churches, synagogues or other religious institutions to permit these ceremonies to be held on their grounds. It would not even require that religious communities discuss the issue. People of faith would remain free to make their own judgments about what makes a marriage made in the eyes of God – just as they are today.”

From Republican Michael Edwards:

“Religious definitions of marriage are untouched by opening civil marriage to all couples, regardless of gender. Churches and other religious organizations can still marry people using the tenets of their faith. Inclusiveness in civil marriage will allow all Americans to be able to benefit from stable relationships, and committed partners, something Bush has already stated is an important to the health of our society.”

This is just a small sample of affirmations of religious liberty by marriage equality advocates. Thousands of such statements are readily available in online and offline resources. But, Donald Wildmon and the American Family Association didn’t want their supporters to know that. So, they lied. Donald Wildmon lied to his followers to keep them in line.

If you’ve ever made a donation to the American Family Association, and you’re still inclined to trust Donald Wildmon and his organization’s leadership, I encourage you to present a simple challenge. If Don Wildon was telling the truth, it should be easy for him to meet the challenge.

Ask Donald Wildmon to name one organization promoting marriage equality for all Americans that says it wants to strip away the religious liberty of right wing churches. Ask him to name just one.

Go ahead and make the call to the American Family Association, and see what they have to tell you: 1-662 844-5036


9 Comments »

  1. While “Sir” Elton John isn’t quite what you’d call an organization, he does have repertoire and resources large enough to strike up action similar to an organization. He had this to say about the subject:

    “I think religion has always tried to turn hatred towards gay people. Religion promotes the hatred and spite against gays.”

    He has also called for the banning of organized religion, as he sees them as “hate organizations”. It’s not unreasonable to think that, if given a longer leash in this country, others would create coalitions with the intent to carry out action with goals that parallel Elton John’s.

    Comment by b-rad — 12/23/2007 @ 2:58 am

  2. b-rad, I might as well say that, while you’re not really an organization, you’re not using your real name, so I’ll say that you’re an organization.

    You fail the challenge.

    Comment by J. Clifford — 12/23/2007 @ 3:19 am

  3. The original quote provided is:

    “Once homosexual marriage is legal, our religious liberties will be stripped away. Even pro-homosexual marriage advocates agree with that statement.”

    The original statement is not exclusive to organizations, so why is the challenge? Why should the challenge be something that limits evidence supporting the original claim?

    The rest of the quote from Elton John:

    “I would ban religion completely. Organized religion doesn’t seem to work. It turns people into really hateful lemmings and it’s not really compassionate.”

    Sounds like a pretty bold provocation to the constitutions of most modern nations to me. And it comes from an individual with a net worth of about $500 million. I would expect that far exceeds the resources of any of the above named organizations.

    - Brad N.

    Comment by b-rad — 12/23/2007 @ 4:14 am

  4. Uh, b-rad, Elton John is not an organization, any more than you are.

    Should I start writing that “B-rad, an organization dedicated to discrediting Elton John, has started visiting Irregular Times”?

    Comment by J. Clifford — 12/23/2007 @ 4:22 am

  5. You didn’t answer my question.

    “The original statement is not exclusive to organizations, so why is the challenge? Why should the challenge be something that limits evidence supporting the original claim?”

    An advocate is not exclusively an organization - it can just as easily be an individual.

    So yes, by technicality I fail the challenge but prove the point in question.

    Comment by b-rad — 12/23/2007 @ 4:44 am

  6. All you show is that someone, somewhere in the world thinks something. Hoo-rah.

    You fail the challenge. Move on.

    Comment by Jim — 12/23/2007 @ 5:39 am

  7. I don’t see any statement about gay marriage by Elton John. Does he have a gay marriage agenda that would destroy straight marriage?

    The quotation provided just talks about hate and banning organized religion in order to restore compassion, not to do away with traditional heterosexual marriage.

    Comment by Iroquois — 12/23/2007 @ 11:12 am

  8. The topic is that the promotion of gay marriage threatens religious liberty.

    Elton John on gay marriage:

    “I’m all for gay marriage. Gay people deserve the same rights if they’re going to be together for life.”

    Comment by b-rad — 12/23/2007 @ 5:02 pm

  9. And that threatens religious liberty…uh, exactly how?

    Unless you belong to a religion that believes you’re supposed to kill everyone who is not exactly like you.

    Comment by Illinois — 12/23/2007 @ 6:00 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment


irregular arrows of splitting timeContact Us

Contact us via "retorts AT irregulartimes.com"

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly e-mail newsletter:


Get Active!



New Political Products

Obama-Biden bumper stickers

Obama-Biden Buttons and Magnets

Obama-Biden T-Shirts

Anti-McCain Shop: Buttons, T-Shirts and Bumper Stickers Against John McCain in 2008

Election 2012 Shop: Because the second term isn't an anointment

-- Who's For Obama?

Create Your Own Election 2008 Poster, Button, or Bumper Sticker for congressional and senatorial candidates

Bumper Stickers:

Bulk Discount Bumper Stickers
Anti-Bush
Anti-War
Peace
Liberal
Pro-Gay and Pro-Choice
State Politics
Local Politics
Godless and Heretical
Environmental
Pro-Science
President 2008
Barack Obama

Small liberal button in red, white and blue

buttons and magnets:

Anti-McCain buttons
Anti-McCain magnets

Anti-Bush buttons
Anti-Bush magnets

Election 2008 buttons
Election 2008 pins
Election 2008 magnets

Pro-environment buttons
Pro-environment pins
Pro-environment magnets

Heretical buttons
Heretical pins
Heretical magnets

LGBT Pride buttons
Gay and Lesbian freedom buttons
LGBT magnets

Anti-war buttons
Peace pins
Anti-war magnets

Liberal buttons
Progressive pins
Liberal magnets

Alternative vision buttons and magnets
Pro-Choice buttons, magnets and stickers
Barack Obama 2008 buttons and magnets


Portrait of Barack Obama Vote T-Shirt Made in the USA


American Apparel t-shirts:



Alternative Sexuality Shirts
Anti-Bush Shirts
Anti-McCain Shirts
Baby Onesies for Liberals
Barack Obama for President Shirts
Democratic Shirts
Environmentalist Shirts
Heretical T-Shirts
Homeland Insecurity Shirts
Kids' T-Shirts
IrregulariTees
Progressive Holiday Shirts
Progressive Moral Values Shirts
The Republican Menace Shirts
State Politics Shirts
War and Peace Shirts


The Definition of A Pacifist Sweat-Free T-Shirt


Books

Our newest book set:
Election Book: 2008 Reasons to Elect a Progressive President, Volume One
2008 Reasons to Elect a Progressive President, Volume 1:
Reasons 1-1034 on Community, Economy, Education, the Environment and Freedom
Election Book: 2008 Reasons to Elect a Progressive President, Volume Two
2008 Reasons to Elect a Progressive President, Volume 2:
Reasons 1035-2008 on History, War and Peace, Democrats, Republicans, and Values



Find more at Irregular Books

Liberal Lapel Stickers:

Barack Obama Lapel Stickers
Anti-Bush Lapel Stickers
Pro-Constitution Lapel Stickers
Pro-Choice Lapel Stickers
Environment Lapel Stickers
Liberal Lapel Stickers
LGBT Lapel Stickers
Peace Lapel Stickers
Religious Freedom Lapel Stickers

many choices in irregular times

Other Goods:

Liberal Yard Signs

Posters

Postcards

Greeting Cards

Political Thong Underwear

Political Banners for Protests and Campaigns

Barack Obama Union-Made Shirts


No Iran War Yard Sign


text catalogs:


bumper sticker text-only catalog
made in the usa shirt text-only catalog
political button, magnet and lapel sticker text-only catalog