A really quick and simple question:
Conservatives used to say they were for small government.
What happened to that?
When old landmarks crumble, established roads no longer lead the way. New paths open to those with an irregular eye. Our news is unfit for print.
A really quick and simple question:
Conservatives used to say they were for small government.
What happened to that?
Big Finance Democrats Willing to Throw Obama Under the Bus for irking their Masters (1 comments) ... J. Clifford
Vlad The Impaler for President 2012 (4 comments) ... F.G. Fitzer ... Benjamin Barber ... F.G. Fitzer ... Tom
Presidential Candidate Taking Part In Anti-PGA Protest Today. Guess Who. (5 comments) ... J. Clifford ... Fed up ... J. Clifford ... Jim Cook
Occupation of Public Squares across the Country, ongoing
Occupy the PGA, Benton Harbor MI, May 23
Protest the Bohemian Grove, Monte Rio CA, July 14 and 21
Stop the Frack Attack national anti-fracking rally, Washington DC July 28
find more detailed protest information here
© 2012 Irregular Times
TravelBlogger Theme developed by FreeTravelWebsiteTemplates.com | Powered by WordPress
Limited Government conservatives have been pushed aside by social conservatives. That’s what happened. “Moral” issues have become sacrosanct, and government a tool to achieve those ends at any cost.
The Republican Revolution happened.
See also this Cato Institute book forum: Buck Wild: How Republicans Broke the Bank and Became the Party of Big Government.
as a 30-year old liberaltarian(tm), raised mostly in Kentucky by mostly hippies, with formative years in the reaganera, I have to say that this “transformation” is more a chang eof PoV as far as I can tell. when i forst heard someone refer to Republicans as the party of Small Governement, it took me a long time to get my head around it. I can see where it comes from, now, but i don’t think claling one or the other “big” or “small government” is really that meaningful.
Generally, the Democrats (it always seemed to me) want government support of individuals bigger, and regulation of corporations bigger. the Republicans want support for corporations bigger, an regulation of individuals bigger. It has always seemed to me that the guys who wanted to reduce the governement to a size that could be drowned in a bathtub weren’t counting the jails and military, let alone their own paychecks and pork. And the guys who were accused of being abotu Big Government were accuse dof that not for governing, but for supporting the less fortunate.
But the overall size of the government is all about the levels of bureaucracy. The paperwork required to have a card on file for every american is big government when it’s to assure that every american has access to their rights, but it’s jsut the cost of the war on terror when it’s to keep tabs on where they’re traveling or who they’re working for, according to the republicans, but whatever; either way its a lot of paper, and that means a lot of paper pushers. FOIA just means it takes more people to decide when to say “no” to a request.
(ever tried to go through the process to receive federal disability? little hint, if you did it yourself you may well not qualify. the paperwork, the traveling around, the phone calls and hold times… it’s like having a job.
Actually, it’s worse. I have a job, and I’m glad I do, because I’d never manage to keep up with my share of the beaurocracy.)
So smaller governement? sure. i’m all for it. but let’s see if we can do it without reducing the services we provide to individuals, or loosening the wet-napkin grip we have on corporations. calling republicans smaller government, when they’ve always, as far as i can remember, been the ones who wanted to have laws about who i could marry? or what i could eat, drink, and otherwise cram into my body? or say or write or draw? Not so much.
They went to Liliputia, where the government really is small.