Homosexuality is as natural and probably has as many advantages in reality as infertility.

It gives the world another set of committed couples who are able to take care of children unwanted by the couples that produce them.

Animals of all species have homosexuals, possibly the lesbians less pronounced, but definitely in existence. It’s not just a matter of dominance.

Also; prostate gland and clit show that there IS physical compatibility with same-sex sex.

Biological, natural, and physically practical. How much more do you need?

You can google the examples if you like. There’s a pair of gay penguins in New York zoo, a lot of research going into homosexual sheep, and much more besides.

Personally I don’t find it any more comfortable to be “confronted” with overweight men wanting to go out with me than to have women hitting on me, but I hardly try to have laws set against them.

Heterosexuality gets people pregnant. It spreads more disease and the massive majority of sex crimes are heterosexual. Domestic violence also tends to be between men and women. And more heterosexuals cause car crashes. And plane crashes. I say we ban it.

“The lifestyle choice is rife with promiscuity, predatorship and infidelity”…looks like CharlieJ is in favor of gay marriage, then. The antidote to all of that playing the field stuff is acceptance of gays who make a public lifetime commitment.

CharilieJ’s arguments could be used to try to keep any religious or ethnic group out of anything based on an accident of birth. That he has chosen gays as his target points to a personal case of homophobia.

Scientific? No.

Biased? Yes.

It figures that this sort of thing would be used as justification for attacking people on the basis of their sexuality.

CharlieJ, you completely failed to address the content of this article. You’re merely making assertions, not dealing with the underlying lack of reasoned argument behind Peter Pace’s immoral bigotry.

How do you feel about Pace’s comments?
Agree 65% (~176,000)
Disagree 33%
Not sure 3%
Total Votes: 270,644

I applaud General Peter Pace for taking the correct stand on this matter. His comments are right on target. There is NO REASON for him to apologize to anyone. His personal beliefs are his own and NO ONE need apologize for their personal beliefs. While I agree that he should be loving and respectful in his statements and (more importantly) actions, being forced to accept and celebrate the choice of homosexual behavior is NOT something anyone should be confronted with — military or civilian.
These gay advocacy groups need to sit down and shut up! There is NOTHING “outrageous” or “insensitive” in what General Pace said in the interview. I listened to part of his comments. He was soft-spoken and respectful, but also firm in his resolve. Pace answered one question with a very straightforward and truthful answer, “The US Military’s mission fundamentally rests on the trust, confidence, cooperation amongst its members, and the homosexual lifestyle does not comport with that kind of trust and confidence and therefore is not supported within the US military. I’ll leave it at that.”
Homosexuality *is* an immoral act. It is NOT natural, normal or moral. The lifestyle choice is rife with promiscuity, predatorship and infidelity — all matters that point to trust, confidence and cooperation. General Pace should be applauded for standing his ground and speaking the truth.
I, personally, plan to be active in the fight against these homosexual advocacy groups as they seek to villainize General Pace. Here’s hoping you will join the fight as well. It’s high time conservatives (especially Christians) stand up for our beliefs and convictions.

Morality doesn’t apply to economic or military policy anymore. Just sexual behavior.