With one third of the precincts in New Hampshire, Ron Paul announced his victory in the Republican presidential primary of 2008. “By coming in 5th place, when in fact it’s quite plain that the majority of the American people love me dearly, and support my political agenda without reservation, we have won the most important race of all: The race for the open eyes of American citizens. Who could now deny that a secret international society of bureaucrats is plotting to take over the American government, and force the United States to merge with Mexico and Canada? What else could explain the huge gap between the number of my supporters and the number of votes I have received?”
Ron Paul declined to say when he would choose a Vice Presidential running mate, or choose a Cabinet. “Have patience, my people,” he said. “There is an entire year before my inauguration yet, and we will be deliberate in choosing the government officials who will not have any constitutional authority to actually do anything. I’ll start out by holding surrender negotiations with the leadership of Bilderberg and other Illuminati organizations before I get to my official non-business as President.”
Facing a crowd of skeptical reporters who refused to understand his logic, Ron Paul slowly explained to them that he would win the presidential election, even though he had yet to place even in the top three in Iowa, Wyoming or New Hampshire. “If I can just come in 5th place in every state,” Paul said, “then they’ll have to have a brokered convention. I’ll be the natural pick, given my consistent showing, so unlike McCain, who can’t decide whether he wants to come in first or not.”
we’re trying to change the world and take our government back. Think those in power are just gonna let go that easy? There are plenty of cheats going on and they’ll get exposed.
Oh, so they STOLE the primary election. The voting machines were all rigged? And the polls before then, too? Oh! That explains it.
Why do progressives claim that the election in 2004 was stolen, and there was vote fraud, and that the judicial system is also bought, but claim that nothing of the sort is happening now?
It does explain it! Jim, that’s a work of genius! See, that PROVES that Ron Paul is the rightful President of the United States! The refusal of the mainstream media to admit that is only further evidence that no one less than the Trilateral Commission is behind this.
Do you think that it’s coincidence that Helen Mirren starred in The Queen in the very same year that Ron Paul announced his campaign to become President of the United States?
The Chunnel was just a practice run for the North American Highway, you know. It let Catholic rats onto the island. That’s why Tony Blair turned.
Oh, there were little things like EVIDENCE in the case of Ohio, 2004, and massive lines around the block, etc., and there is NO EVIDENCE for this Ron Paul conspiracy theory garbage.
Something like that, PM.
PM,
Because Ron Paul is in FIFTH PLACE. The parallel would have been Ralph Nader claiming in 2000 that really, if you had counted all the votes, HE would have won.
No! It’s really true! There is a conspiracy against Ron Paul and if you can’t see that, then you must be a monkey!
Here’s how it went down: Duncan Hunter stole that .5 percent of votes from Ron Paul, and if Ron Paul had that .5 percent, he could have gotten 4th place, and if Ron Paul had gotten 4th place in New Hampshire, he could have gotten 3rd place in the next primary, and then 2nd place, and then 1st place all the way!
Duncan Hunter knew that, and so did the Council of Foreign Relations. CFR was in the middle of it, and that means only one thing. Queen Elizabeth II!
Before you continue to mock, look up IMBRA on Google. The law forces Americans to be background checked before being allowed to say hello to foreigners on internationally oriented dating websites.
Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo voted no on this. No other Republican dared stand up to the feminist lobby on that one.
So don’t be arrogant about this. Ron Paul simply made the mistake of stressing his anti-war credentials in a party that considers national security, temporarily, to be pro-war.
I happen to disagree with Ron Paul on national security but I agree with him on most other things (he does not put “defeat of the Bilderbergs” on his platform, so that does not count, although you should not be so smug about real meetings that occur between people who do not invite YOU).
Well, Jack, how do you know we’re not part of the conspiracy? See, it’s just what you’d least expect.