Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly e-mail newsletter:
"The secret of ugliness consists not in irregularity, but in being uninteresting." - Ralph Waldo Emerson



The writings of white supremacist shooter James Von Brunn on Free Republic, and right-wing readers' positive reaction to his writings, is mirrored here for historical reference. Free Republic has taken the post down, trying to shove it down the memory hole.



Read the Google Cache of the "Arizona Sentinel" blog cut-and-paste hack job that right-wingers are claiming "proves" that Barack Obama applied to Occidental College as a foreigner. As you'll see with a quick read and the most minimal effort to find the faked sources referred to within, it's a hoax. Also a hoax, therefore, is the claim by right-wingers that the "Arizona Sentinel" is a newspaper website taken down by The Man because conspiracy theorists were TOO CLOSE to the truth! See here for a debunking of the fake "article."



Had it up to here with the silence of the Speaker of the House during years and years of U.S. Government torture? Then shout it to the highest clouds: Nancy Pelosi, Resign!

Jan. 21 Democratic Debate: Edwards’ Daddy Again

Hey, John Edwards just mentioned that his dad worked in a mill! I don’t know about you, but I’ve never heard that before.

But I’d rather hear about John Edwards’s daddy’s choice in underwear for twenty minutes than listen to twenty minutes of disappointing “neener, neener, you tie your shoes wrong” exchanges between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Spread the Word:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • ThisNext
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Propeller

4 comments to Jan. 21 Democratic Debate: Edwards’ Daddy Again

  • Mark

    I will admit that this was the first Democratic debate that I have watched. Until this point I have bee a rather passive observer of the nomination process. Before the debate I was leaning towards voting for Edwards. I didn’t think that Clinton would be able to unify the country behind her. I also didn’t think that Obama has the experience necessary to be President. There was little in the debate that changed my mind. I will admit, however, that there was also little in the debate that would change the minds of Clinton or Obama supporters. We’ll have to see how things fall out on Saturday when those of us in SC vote in the Democratic primary.

    On a side note, it was interesting to see the report that the Republican SC primary drew fewer people than in 2004. Is this a reflection of the alienation that the Republican party has created within the SC population? If Saturday’s Democratic primary results in an increase in participation then the results in the general election in November are promising for the Democratic party.

  • I found that Edwards was by far the most civil, which is revealing, given that many times it’s those who are behind that decide to become the most critical. I thought that Clinton was stretching to find things to criticize in Barack Obama, and that Obama did good job responding.

    I still haven’t made a choice between the three, though, and I may not end up making one at all.

  • Mark

    Edwards was definitely the most civil, almost to the point of being neglected. While Clinton and Obama were having at each other, Edwards was quiet. Whether this was a weakness on his part or simple Southern hospitality remains to be seen. Either way, I think he emerged as the strongest candidate.

  • Juniper

    I hate it when people talk about “simple Southern hospitality”. I’ve lived in the North, and I’ve lived in the South, and Southerners are no more hospitable than anyone else in the country.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>