<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mystery Back Yard Iron Ball Archaeology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/04/12/mystery-back-yard-iron-ball-archaeology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/04/12/mystery-back-yard-iron-ball-archaeology/</link>
	<description>When old landmarks crumble, established roads no longer lead the way.  New paths open to those with an irregular eye. Our news is unfit for print.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juniper</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/04/12/mystery-back-yard-iron-ball-archaeology/comment-page-1/#comment-371125</link>
		<dc:creator>Juniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=7698#comment-371125</guid>
		<description>Looks to me like it came from a pinball machine.  Those are solid iron, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks to me like it came from a pinball machine.  Those are solid iron, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damen</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/04/12/mystery-back-yard-iron-ball-archaeology/comment-page-1/#comment-368411</link>
		<dc:creator>Damen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=7698#comment-368411</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s only a possibility of being Grapeshot if JClifford lives in a coastal town, Draconicus. Though Grapeshot was known to be used in artillery cannons, so...maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s only a possibility of being Grapeshot if JClifford lives in a coastal town, Draconicus. Though Grapeshot was known to be used in artillery cannons, so&#8230;maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draconicus</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/04/12/mystery-back-yard-iron-ball-archaeology/comment-page-1/#comment-368403</link>
		<dc:creator>Draconicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=7698#comment-368403</guid>
		<description>Err... Well if it&#039;s iron, maybe not. Check anyway!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapeshot
Maybe a ball from this? Look for more - if you find them, it&#039;s a good possibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err&#8230; Well if it&#8217;s iron, maybe not. Check anyway!<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapeshot" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapeshot</a><br />
Maybe a ball from this? Look for more &#8211; if you find them, it&#8217;s a good possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draconicus</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/04/12/mystery-back-yard-iron-ball-archaeology/comment-page-1/#comment-368401</link>
		<dc:creator>Draconicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=7698#comment-368401</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably a musket ball from a very early rifle. Depending on where you live, it may have even been part of a war! Bring it to a historian right away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably a musket ball from a very early rifle. Depending on where you live, it may have even been part of a war! Bring it to a historian right away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damen</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/04/12/mystery-back-yard-iron-ball-archaeology/comment-page-1/#comment-368348</link>
		<dc:creator>Damen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=7698#comment-368348</guid>
		<description>If it were made of lead rather than iron I&#039;d suggest it may be an old musket ball. As it stands, I&#039;m stumped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were made of lead rather than iron I&#8217;d suggest it may be an old musket ball. As it stands, I&#8217;m stumped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenniearcheo</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/04/12/mystery-back-yard-iron-ball-archaeology/comment-page-1/#comment-368303</link>
		<dc:creator>jenniearcheo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=7698#comment-368303</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t seen anything like that before, but I suppose it could be from an early lawnmower or tractor. If there&#039;s a barn nearby, and it was in the farm lane, it could easily have fallen from some big ugly bit of farm equipment. The nail is a cut nail, which were made from the 1790s, and are still used. However, the wire nail came around in the 1870s, and gradually took over the market. Cut nails began as sheets, which is why they&#039;re the same thickness in one dimension, and narrow in the other dimension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t seen anything like that before, but I suppose it could be from an early lawnmower or tractor. If there&#8217;s a barn nearby, and it was in the farm lane, it could easily have fallen from some big ugly bit of farm equipment. The nail is a cut nail, which were made from the 1790s, and are still used. However, the wire nail came around in the 1870s, and gradually took over the market. Cut nails began as sheets, which is why they&#8217;re the same thickness in one dimension, and narrow in the other dimension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.299 seconds -->

