 | Democratic Party Sheep: If You Criticize Our Shepherd, He Will Die! |
I have been astounded by the response of Democratic Party loyalists to writing by non-partisans across the country regarding Barack Obama and his support for the FISA Amendments Act.
(The FISA Amendments Act is, for those of you living in a cave, the bill passed into law with Obama’s help, the bill that Obama solemnly promised in the primaries he would filibuster against. This is the bill that gives a president’s administration nice, juicy periods of 67 days in which they can electronically spy on and physically search anyone, anywhere — without warrants, without justifications, and with the ability to keep whatever information is seized during those 67 days.)
On the one hand, these Democratic partisans will go on and on about what a strong candidate for president Barack Obama is, how formidable and impressive he is, how they have been waiting their whole lives if they’re young, or since Kennedy if they’re old, for someone who can lead and inspire the country so forcefully. With a swift flick of the wrist on the other hand, they explain that thanks to liberals raising their hands and criticizing Barack Obama for his support of this anti-constitutional, authoritarian bill, John McCain will sweep into the White House the November election and all of Obama’s hopes will be dashed. Yes, that’s right: now they’re saying that Obama is a great, strong candidate — so strong that any criticism of him will crumple his candidacy like a sheet of old, battered tinfoil.
The second cry from Democratic partisans rises from the vantage point of the enemy! “Now you know what those Republicans are going to do?”, whine the Democratic sheep. “They’re going to shoot Barack Obama down! And why? Because you writers have given the Republicans ammunition!” Calling Barack Obama’s support of the FISA Amendments Act “ammunition” is a tacit admission by the sheep that Obama’s pro-FAA stance is something to be ashamed of. But rather than noting the shame, they want to put the shame in some dark, hidden-away corner where… where what? Where the Republicans won’t find it? Oh come on, sheep: Obama cast a series of votes in the light of day. Did you think the Republican Party wouldn’t be able to find the votes, if only some liberal writers didn’t point them out? The elephants are not blind. Besides, the Republican Party cannot use Barack Obama’s votes supporting the FAA as “ammunition” — because every single member of the Republican Party in the Senate also voted for the bill!
The response of these Democratic Party sheep shows us what’s wrong with our democracy, and why authoritarian domestic spy legislation can pass through the House and Senate without so much as a “baaaaaa” from most corners of the Democratic Party caucus. The Democratic partisans don’t see democracy as a process in which citizens actively and thoughtfully participate, using their First Amendment rights to speak their piece, confident that the collective aggregation of civic discourse will elevate politics. Nope. The Democratic partisans see themselves as loyal herd animals, and see democracy as a process in which their job is to support the Party and talk up the Party’s candidates. In their eyes, people who can’t do that, or who can’t at least shut up and stay out of the way, are bad sheep. This is a view of citizens as subject. It makes perfect sense that people who see themselves as sheep wouldn’t object so much to the FISA Amendments Act. The new law, after all, would make us all into sheep: sheep who stand compliantly as they are sheared and tagged, sheep who raise their tails silently for the latest probe.
Remember what Benjamin Franklin said: “Make yourself a sheep and the wolves will eat you.”
Contact Us
Nowian’s Law: Following the path of least resistance is what makes politicians and rivers crooked. (Source: Murphy’s Law)
Comment by EvilPoet — 7/11/2008 @ 3:05 pm
Another thing my local Obama campaign worker said that bugged me: I agree with you on the FISA Amendments Act and I think it was a mistake for Obama to support it but, well, you’ve got to admit that taking a strategic shift to the right is a good campaign move now.
But it wasn’t. It was a stupid move, even by purely Machiavellian standards–just bad tactics.
1. If you want to make a strategic shift to the right, how about making a move you haven’t already promised you wouldn’t make? Don’t flip-flop.
2. If you want to stand up to the Left wing of your party, get ready for a conflict and prepare yourself to look good coming out of it. Obama left his campaign volunteers and staff sitting there saying, well, yeah this is bad but McCain is even worse. There’s a word for statements like that: “negative.”
3. Don’t ask your base to give up on its values. The Republicans never do this. They take the trouble to at least TRY to convince their base that they’re standing up for what’s right.
4. If you’re going to take a stand against your own party’s values, come up with something convincing to say about the alternative values you are embracing and why. Get ready to meet the Left wing’s criticism (you knew this was coming, right? tell me you knew this was coming) with some of the values you’ve been espousing–”courage,” “change,” “putting fear behind us.” Obama can’t link it to any of these, because it’s more of the same and the politics of fear.
5. Take a stand on something that doesn’t look like playing footsie with corporate special interests and lobbyists. Hint to Obama campaign: Granting retroactive immunity to big companies looks like something the lobbyists just might have been grubbing for.
Yeah, it bothers me that Obama is just another scheming, calculating politician. I never believed in the hype. But it also annoys me that he’s not even GOOD at Machiavellian machinations.
Even on a purely strategic level, he has played his hand very, very poorly.
Comment by Ralph — 7/11/2008 @ 3:10 pm
I’m hearing exactly the same thing from people as I talk to them about Obama’s FISA vote (most of them have not read the legislation). They want me NOT to talk about it, because “we need a united front in November to defeat the Republicans.” And I say, “But, the what about the Constituti–” and they interrupt, “Shhhhh! Unity!”
It’s a bummer.
Comment by Bob S-K — 7/12/2008 @ 10:18 pm
I think you’re being a little harsh. After all America’s been through the last few years, with this shocking split becoming very obvious between left and right wing, I think people are just nervous and desperate for a sense of calm.
Political preferences do give hints to background and personalities, but they’re not an ultimate decider and it’s a shame that the UNITED States is so horribly devided on the matter at the moment.
People are being blindly optimistic for the hope that things are about to change, and whilst that’s not smart it’s certainly understandable.
Whilst it’s important not to forget what democracy SHOULD be about, it’s also worth being realistic about how it works. These 2 points go together fine, there’s no point name-calling (”sheep”) and belittling to try to gain the upper-hand.
A strength of the left-wing/liberal standing is that we try to understand others and use reason, not negative tactics, to bring people together. And the US could really do with some mutual understandings.
Comment by HareTrinity — 7/13/2008 @ 6:31 am
That could be the new slogan for Obama, now that Change We Can Believe In has become a farce: Shhhhunity!
Comment by J. Clifford — 7/13/2008 @ 6:33 am