<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview Transcript: Sarah Palin Won&#8217;t Call Abortion Clinic Bombers Terrorists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/10/23/transcript-sarah-palin-wont-call-abortion-bombers-terrorists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/10/23/transcript-sarah-palin-wont-call-abortion-bombers-terrorists/</link>
	<description>When old landmarks crumble, established roads no longer lead the way.  New paths open to those with an irregular eye. Our news is unfit for print.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/10/23/transcript-sarah-palin-wont-call-abortion-bombers-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-460427</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=9262#comment-460427</guid>
		<description>One person&#039;s terrorist is another person&#039;s freedom fighter.

America has a long and bloody history supporting terrorists, of course we call them freedom fighters, or allies, in the case of Israel. why should it surprise you that a republican shill like Palin will not admit that she supports domestic terrorism when it is used to further her own beliefs and causes.

Terrorists are always the guys on the other side. Otherwise they are &quot;defenders of freedom and decency&quot;.

Palin is sure going to burn in that hell she believes in, along with her &quot;heroes&quot; from the frontlines of the abortion wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One person&#8217;s terrorist is another person&#8217;s freedom fighter.</p>
<p>America has a long and bloody history supporting terrorists, of course we call them freedom fighters, or allies, in the case of Israel. why should it surprise you that a republican shill like Palin will not admit that she supports domestic terrorism when it is used to further her own beliefs and causes.</p>
<p>Terrorists are always the guys on the other side. Otherwise they are &#8220;defenders of freedom and decency&#8221;.</p>
<p>Palin is sure going to burn in that hell she believes in, along with her &#8220;heroes&#8221; from the frontlines of the abortion wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajs</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/10/23/transcript-sarah-palin-wont-call-abortion-bombers-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-460267</link>
		<dc:creator>ajs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=9262#comment-460267</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a slippery slope.  Give them an inch and they&#039;ll go after women that experience spontaneous abortions.  So far as I can tell, conception is a process that works hard to succeed and makes provision for correcting mistakes by aborting.  Miscarriage is far more common than the medical procedure and the loss is no less profound yet there is no moaning and gnashing of teeth when a fetus fails on its own.  

The business of enslaving women (what else do you call forced labor?) to preserve the primacy of somebody else’s amateur standing on the alter of it&#039;s only bad if when a doctor terminates the pregnancy is wrenched civics being perpetrated by people who ought to be grateful that the intrusion they are so blithe to call for in support of their conviction won&#039;t be turned against them the way it is in China (so that babies who are permitted to go full term will have enough to eat once they&#039;re born).  

I&#039;d prefer that government has no business regulating the status of tissue beyond ruling that it can&#039;t be sold.  While a possible person has no viability separate from its mother - like it or not there&#039;s no rightness in requiring a woman to attempt gestate it against her will, and it&#039;s disgusting when the conception resulted from rape or it&#039;s equivalent and it&#039;s cruel to all involved forcing women to inflict birth on a baby that is positive for Tay Sachs disease.  But that&#039;s the kind of thing you get from people that cling bitterly (they can live with disgusting and cruel is sure-enough bitter) to their one tiny thought; all the while confusing it&#039;s simplicity for truth.  And thinking that imposing it on other people means they have a life.

Now how do you think I can find respect for Sarah Palin?  Well not yet for sure – like the housing market, she hasn’t hit bottom and until she does we don’t know how low she’s willing to go.  &#039;Thing is that I&#039;d rather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a slippery slope.  Give them an inch and they&#8217;ll go after women that experience spontaneous abortions.  So far as I can tell, conception is a process that works hard to succeed and makes provision for correcting mistakes by aborting.  Miscarriage is far more common than the medical procedure and the loss is no less profound yet there is no moaning and gnashing of teeth when a fetus fails on its own.  </p>
<p>The business of enslaving women (what else do you call forced labor?) to preserve the primacy of somebody else’s amateur standing on the alter of it&#8217;s only bad if when a doctor terminates the pregnancy is wrenched civics being perpetrated by people who ought to be grateful that the intrusion they are so blithe to call for in support of their conviction won&#8217;t be turned against them the way it is in China (so that babies who are permitted to go full term will have enough to eat once they&#8217;re born).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer that government has no business regulating the status of tissue beyond ruling that it can&#8217;t be sold.  While a possible person has no viability separate from its mother &#8211; like it or not there&#8217;s no rightness in requiring a woman to attempt gestate it against her will, and it&#8217;s disgusting when the conception resulted from rape or it&#8217;s equivalent and it&#8217;s cruel to all involved forcing women to inflict birth on a baby that is positive for Tay Sachs disease.  But that&#8217;s the kind of thing you get from people that cling bitterly (they can live with disgusting and cruel is sure-enough bitter) to their one tiny thought; all the while confusing it&#8217;s simplicity for truth.  And thinking that imposing it on other people means they have a life.</p>
<p>Now how do you think I can find respect for Sarah Palin?  Well not yet for sure – like the housing market, she hasn’t hit bottom and until she does we don’t know how low she’s willing to go.  &#8216;Thing is that I&#8217;d rather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/10/23/transcript-sarah-palin-wont-call-abortion-bombers-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-460266</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=9262#comment-460266</guid>
		<description>&quot;There’s no question Bill Ayres, under his own admittance, was, um, one who sought to destroy, er, our US Capitol and our Pentagon&quot;

Stupid and Mendacious.  no question!

destroy our US Capitol?  

McCain: &quot;and it was a planned and calculated overall strategy to destroy America&quot;

destroy America?  BY panting small bombs

&quot;at the New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, in a men&#039;s lavatory in the Capitol building in 1971 and in a women&#039;s restroom in the Pentagon in 1972,&quot; 

?  that&#039;s the plan?  blow up America&#039;s crap-houses so we have no where to go poopy?  That&#039;s going to destroy America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There’s no question Bill Ayres, under his own admittance, was, um, one who sought to destroy, er, our US Capitol and our Pentagon&#8221;</p>
<p>Stupid and Mendacious.  no question!</p>
<p>destroy our US Capitol?  </p>
<p>McCain: &#8220;and it was a planned and calculated overall strategy to destroy America&#8221;</p>
<p>destroy America?  BY panting small bombs</p>
<p>&#8220;at the New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, in a men&#8217;s lavatory in the Capitol building in 1971 and in a women&#8217;s restroom in the Pentagon in 1972,&#8221; </p>
<p>?  that&#8217;s the plan?  blow up America&#8217;s crap-houses so we have no where to go poopy?  That&#8217;s going to destroy America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DARK ENERGY</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/10/23/transcript-sarah-palin-wont-call-abortion-bombers-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-460237</link>
		<dc:creator>DARK ENERGY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=9262#comment-460237</guid>
		<description>Very disturbing and very telling.

xDxEx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very disturbing and very telling.</p>
<p>xDxEx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HareTrinity</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/10/23/transcript-sarah-palin-wont-call-abortion-bombers-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-460206</link>
		<dc:creator>HareTrinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=9262#comment-460206</guid>
		<description>That should say &quot;assault people or attack areas&quot; on paragraph 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should say &#8220;assault people or attack areas&#8221; on paragraph 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HareTrinity</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/10/23/transcript-sarah-palin-wont-call-abortion-bombers-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-460205</link>
		<dc:creator>HareTrinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=9262#comment-460205</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m pro-animal rights. I very much believe animals deserve rights, that how we treat them says things about our society, and I know various issues faced by animal rights campaigners.

However, I don&#039;t agree with the ones who dig up corpses (there was a case in the UK a while back), or assault places, or even those who verbally attack non-vegans.

It&#039;s a sad case where a person refuses to distance themselves from the campaigners giving their case a bad name.

[Personally I&#039;m pro-choice, but I support people&#039;s rights to state their opinions, and society&#039;s allowance of such views in order to keep things in check, though I very much doubt the rights of babies are at stake. Though I do wish they wouldn&#039;t hide behind the Bible, which allows abortion as assault at most, not murder, as implied by Exodus 21:22 according to most interpretations.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m pro-animal rights. I very much believe animals deserve rights, that how we treat them says things about our society, and I know various issues faced by animal rights campaigners.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t agree with the ones who dig up corpses (there was a case in the UK a while back), or assault places, or even those who verbally attack non-vegans.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad case where a person refuses to distance themselves from the campaigners giving their case a bad name.</p>
<p>[Personally I'm pro-choice, but I support people's rights to state their opinions, and society's allowance of such views in order to keep things in check, though I very much doubt the rights of babies are at stake. Though I do wish they wouldn't hide behind the Bible, which allows abortion as assault at most, not murder, as implied by Exodus 21:22 according to most interpretations.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.309 seconds -->

