Comments on: Watch Out For Global Warming Muths! http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/20/watch-out-for-global-warming-muths/ When old landmarks crumble, established roads no longer lead the way. New paths open to those with an irregular eye. Our news is unfit for print. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:18:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: bildterberg http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/20/watch-out-for-global-warming-muths/comment-page-1/#comment-561513 bildterberg Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:20:48 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=10675#comment-561513 Well, Jim. Try doing some linear regression over that period of 30 years (if you insist on using linear trends). I should estimate the slope to about 0.4 deg C / 30 years which makes, um, 1.2 degrees in 90 years. Well, Jim. Try doing some linear regression over that
period of 30 years (if you insist on using linear trends).
I should estimate the slope to about 0.4 deg C / 30 years
which makes, um, 1.2 degrees in 90 years.

]]> By: Jim http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/20/watch-out-for-global-warming-muths/comment-page-1/#comment-551670 Jim Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:01:59 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=10675#comment-551670 1. Measurements are made using different instruments using different methods at different times, which raises issues for long-term comparison. 2. May 2009 is still above the overall average for the period. 3. The months before May are far above the overall average for the period. 4. If that trend of one month continues for the long term over a period of years and we head into a period of global cooling, then by golly, we will be heading into a period of global cooling, and the validity of the global warming hypothesis will have to be reassessed. But it is, um, one month's deviation you're talking about. So wait and see. 1. Measurements are made using different instruments using different methods at different times, which raises issues for long-term comparison.
2. May 2009 is still above the overall average for the period.
3. The months before May are far above the overall average for the period.
4. If that trend of one month continues for the long term over a period of years and we head into a period of global cooling, then by golly, we will be heading into a period of global cooling, and the validity of the global warming hypothesis will have to be reassessed. But it is, um, one month’s deviation you’re talking about. So wait and see.

]]> By: bildterberg http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/20/watch-out-for-global-warming-muths/comment-page-1/#comment-551661 bildterberg Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:26:41 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=10675#comment-551661 Check these curves out: http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/ Comments? Check these curves out:

http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/

Comments?

]]> By: Tom http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/20/watch-out-for-global-warming-muths/comment-page-1/#comment-512005 Tom Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:47:10 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=10675#comment-512005 i wonder if this book is being promoted or underwritten by Exxon-Mobil, et al. They've been at it for years and due to their greed and short-sightedness, it's most likely far too late to do anything (even going "green", which we're going to HAVE to do anyway for economic and resource scarcity reasons) to mitigate the coming devastation. We're going to pay for screwing up the planet via our ignorant human "civilization" of greed-driven destruction and consumption with our lives, and possibly our species existence along with all the other species we've helped into extinction by our way of living off the planet (rather than tending to the planet). Technology will not save us, but it might help our survival as a species if we were actually doing it globally NOW - which we certainly are NOT. By the time the wide-spread conversion to sustainable energy is undertaken throughout the world and in it's advanced stages of reducing our carbon output, it'll be obvious that we were way too late. i wonder if this book is being promoted or underwritten by Exxon-Mobil, et al. They’ve been at it for years and due to their greed and short-sightedness, it’s most likely far too late to do anything (even going “green”, which we’re going to HAVE to do anyway for economic and resource scarcity reasons) to mitigate the coming devastation.

We’re going to pay for screwing up the planet via our ignorant human “civilization” of greed-driven destruction and consumption with our lives, and possibly our species existence along with all the other species we’ve helped into extinction by our way of living off the planet (rather than tending to the planet). Technology will not save us, but it might help our survival as a species if we were actually doing it globally NOW – which we certainly are NOT.
By the time the wide-spread conversion to sustainable energy is undertaken throughout the world and in it’s advanced stages of reducing our carbon output, it’ll be obvious that we were way too late.

]]>