Irregular Times: News Unfit to Print Logo

It is a time of fear in the face of freedom, a time of barricaded roads and new paths. Maps fade and direction is lost as we glance sideways at the strange lands through which we pass, knowing for certain only that our destination has disappeared. We are unready to meet these times but we proceed nonetheless, adapting as we wander, reshaping the Earth with every tread. Gone are the old times, the standard times, the high times. Welcome to the irregular times.

Otten, Obama. Which is Worse: Copying a Website or Cribbing an Agenda?
posted 1st July 2009 in Barack Obama, Democrats, Homeland Insecurity, Liberty, Politics, Republicans by Jim

Really. Which is worse: that Maine Republican candidate for Governor Les Otten has pretty obviously copied President Barack Obama’s website theme…

Websites of Les Otten and Barack Obama in side by side comparison

… or that President Barack Obama has pretty obviously copied from the Republican Party platform on warrantless surveillance, state secrets, torture, the imbalance of power and anti-gay discrimination?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Comments to “Otten, Obama. Which is Worse: Copying a Website or Cribbing an Agenda?”

  1. qs says:
    7/1/2009 at 6:49 pm

    He made a Les Otten symbol. Why is Obama the only one who gets a symbol?

    Reply
  2. Goji Acai says:
    7/1/2009 at 7:52 pm

    NO ONE SAYS Otten ISN’T ALLOWED to have his own logo (or website for that matter)…

    BUT

    C’MON!! ~ Talk about NO NEW IDEAS!

    Reply
  3. qs says:
    7/1/2009 at 9:46 pm

    Where did Obama get the Obama-logo anyway? Bush never had a logo.

    Reply
  4. Jim says:
    7/1/2009 at 10:11 pm

    Is this an indication that the matter of the Otten-Obama logo is a bigger deal than Obama’s appropriation of GOP policy?

    Reply
  5. Tom says:
    7/2/2009 at 5:40 am

    Yep, add no affordable health care to the growing list of pain the beleaguered public will have to shoulder going forward. The only viable option, the single-payer government sponsored plan, is “off the table” despite the fact that a huge majority of voters have expressed interest in this. Lobbyists (for large corporations) win, we lose.

    Reply

what are you thinking?