<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LGBT Equality Caucus Members Who Don&#8217;t Support DOMA Repeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/</link>
	<description>When old landmarks crumble, established roads no longer lead the way.  New paths open to those with an irregular eye. Our news is unfit for print.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:33:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReMarker</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569323</link>
		<dc:creator>ReMarker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569323</guid>
		<description>After thought:
Polygamy is discriminated against, but it is legislative, not Constitutional, discrimination (a law), and &quot;good&quot; in my judgement. How to raise &quot;physiologically healthy&quot; children with 400 wives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thought:<br />
Polygamy is discriminated against, but it is legislative, not Constitutional, discrimination (a law), and &#8220;good&#8221; in my judgement. How to raise &#8220;physiologically healthy&#8221; children with 400 wives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569319</guid>
		<description>No, at least not historically.  There have been members of the congressional black caucus in the past who have not been black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, at least not historically.  There have been members of the congressional black caucus in the past who have not been black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569318</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569318</guid>
		<description>No, Jacob, I&#039;ve never asked you this question before.  Let me ask you again:

&lt;b&gt;Jacob, do you think that if you move to another state your marriage should not be recognized in that new state?&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Jacob, I&#8217;ve never asked you this question before.  Let me ask you again:</p>
<p><b>Jacob, do you think that if you move to another state your marriage should not be recognized in that new state?</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReMarker</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569317</link>
		<dc:creator>ReMarker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569317</guid>
		<description>Consider this. Can something be &quot;wrong&quot; and still be &quot;good&quot;? Conversly, can something be &quot;right&quot; and still be &quot;bad&quot;?

Right/wrong is a moral judgement, Biblically advised to be made by God only.

Good/bad is a value judgement, and can be made mere mortals.

Seemingly based on your religious beliefs, Jacob, &quot;wrong&quot; may be accurate relative to your religion&#039;s teachings or your understanding of your religious teachings. And it (the legislation) may be (Jacob&#039;s words) &quot;the single most important peice of legislation out there right now&quot; IF your religion believes and teaches its passing adds to America&#039;s unGodliness. 

However, as a mere mortal, I &quot;value&quot; judge the &quot;Respect for Marriage Act of 2009&quot; to be &quot;good&quot; because it doesn&#039;t discriminate (per Constitutional requirements) against anyone because of race, religion, nationality, or sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider this. Can something be &#8220;wrong&#8221; and still be &#8220;good&#8221;? Conversly, can something be &#8220;right&#8221; and still be &#8220;bad&#8221;?</p>
<p>Right/wrong is a moral judgement, Biblically advised to be made by God only.</p>
<p>Good/bad is a value judgement, and can be made mere mortals.</p>
<p>Seemingly based on your religious beliefs, Jacob, &#8220;wrong&#8221; may be accurate relative to your religion&#8217;s teachings or your understanding of your religious teachings. And it (the legislation) may be (Jacob&#8217;s words) &#8220;the single most important peice of legislation out there right now&#8221; IF your religion believes and teaches its passing adds to America&#8217;s unGodliness. </p>
<p>However, as a mere mortal, I &#8220;value&#8221; judge the &#8220;Respect for Marriage Act of 2009&#8243; to be &#8220;good&#8221; because it doesn&#8217;t discriminate (per Constitutional requirements) against anyone because of race, religion, nationality, or sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569315</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569315</guid>
		<description>I have answered this many many many many many many many many many many many times.  I think it is wrong for marriage to be between same sex people.  Therefor, this bill is a very big deal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have answered this many many many many many many many many many many many times.  I think it is wrong for marriage to be between same sex people.  Therefor, this bill is a very big deal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569314</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569314</guid>
		<description>Yet another question you won&#039;t answer.  I think I know why.  This answer has consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another question you won&#8217;t answer.  I think I know why.  This answer has consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569311</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569311</guid>
		<description>Jacob, please, this is far from the most important bill out there.  I would file it under frivolous use of Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob, please, this is far from the most important bill out there.  I would file it under frivolous use of Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qs</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569301</link>
		<dc:creator>qs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 04:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569301</guid>
		<description>Well why don&#039;t they kick those caucus members out of the caucus then?

Side note: How does the black caucus enforce their membership. Do you have to be black?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well why don&#8217;t they kick those caucus members out of the caucus then?</p>
<p>Side note: How does the black caucus enforce their membership. Do you have to be black?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569299</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569299</guid>
		<description>This is much bigger than that and you know it.  This would be a land mark bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is much bigger than that and you know it.  This would be a land mark bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/18/lgbt-equality-caucus-members-who-dont-support-doma-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-569293</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14242#comment-569293</guid>
		<description>Jacob, do you think that if you move to another state your marriage should not be recognized in that new state?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob, do you think that if you move to another state your marriage should not be recognized in that new state?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.328 seconds -->

