Comments on: After 414 Days In Office Obama Still Has No Civil Liberties Board http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2010/03/10/after-414-days-in-office-obama-still-has-no-civil-liberties-board/ When old landmarks crumble, established roads no longer lead the way. New paths open to those with an irregular eye. Our news is unfit for print. Sun, 27 May 2012 01:07:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Jim http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2010/03/10/after-414-days-in-office-obama-still-has-no-civil-liberties-board/comment-page-1/#comment-589950 Jim Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:59:41 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=17722#comment-589950 <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.00001:" rel="nofollow">Confirmation for you</a>: the House bill was indeed passed and signed into law. Confirmation for you: the House bill was indeed passed and signed into law.

]]> By: duke http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2010/03/10/after-414-days-in-office-obama-still-has-no-civil-liberties-board/comment-page-1/#comment-589949 duke Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:56:14 +0000 http://irregulartimes.com/?p=17722#comment-589949 The federal law in the link was not law. But rather a copy of the house bill to be acted on. I saw no indication that the bill linked was even passed much less ever became law. I would like to see such a committee as the Civil Liberties committee described. The federal law in the link was not law. But rather a copy of the house bill to be acted on. I saw no indication that the bill linked was even passed much less ever became law.

I would like to see such a committee as the Civil Liberties committee described.

]]>